diff options
author | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> | 2009-05-08 20:01:09 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> | 2009-09-14 07:18:21 +0200 |
commit | c63e3c0b2498adec921b06c670d12c8c74b85538 (patch) | |
tree | 27ca06415b5fdd51e369361ea8aa8f8e8e1ac741 /lib/reciprocal_div.c | |
parent | d6f5b0aa08078c3dabe377d5b1a6077e9c9352d3 (diff) |
kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: use mutex_lock in reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe
reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe() is a hack to avoid any dependency between
an internal reiserfs mutex and the write lock, it has been proposed
to follow the old bkl logic.
The code does the following:
while (!mutex_trylock(m)) {
reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
schedule();
reiserfs_write_lock(s);
}
It then imitate the implicit behaviour of the lock when it was
a Bkl and hadn't such dependency:
mutex_lock(m) {
if (fastpath)
let's go
else {
wait_for_mutex() {
schedule() {
unlock_kernel()
reacquire_lock_kernel()
}
}
}
}
The problem is that by using such explicit schedule(), we don't
benefit of the adaptive mutex spinning on owner.
The logic in use now is:
reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
mutex_lock(m); // -> possible adaptive spinning
reiserfs_write_lock(s);
[ Impact: restore the use of adaptive spinning mutexes in reiserfs ]
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/reciprocal_div.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions