diff options
| author | Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> | 2011-03-22 16:32:54 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2011-03-22 17:44:04 -0700 |
| commit | 278df9f451dc71dcd002246be48358a473504ad0 (patch) | |
| tree | 3b79e956f2f0b9381f62518ff2fcf94df4ff9c3f /mm/page-writeback.c | |
| parent | 3f58a82943337fb6e79acfa5346719a97d3c0b98 (diff) | |
mm: reclaim invalidated page ASAP
invalidate_mapping_pages is very big hint to reclaimer. It means user
doesn't want to use the page any more. So in order to prevent working set
page eviction, this patch move the page into tail of inactive list by
PG_reclaim.
Please, remember that pages in inactive list are working set as well as
active list. If we don't move pages into inactive list's tail, pages near
by tail of inactive list can be evicted although we have a big clue about
useless pages. It's totally bad.
Now PG_readahead/PG_reclaim is shared. fe3cba17 added ClearPageReclaim
into clear_page_dirty_for_io for preventing fast reclaiming readahead
marker page.
In this series, PG_reclaim is used by invalidated page, too. If VM find
the page is invalidated and it's dirty, it sets PG_reclaim to reclaim
asap. Then, when the dirty page will be writeback,
clear_page_dirty_for_io will clear PG_reclaim unconditionally. It
disturbs this serie's goal.
I think it's okay to clear PG_readahead when the page is dirty, not
writeback time. So this patch moves ClearPageReadahead. In v4,
ClearPageReadahead in set_page_dirty has a problem which is reported by
Steven Barrett. It's due to compound page. Some driver(ex, audio) calls
set_page_dirty with compound page which isn't on LRU. but my patch does
ClearPageRelcaim on compound page. In non-CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED, it
breaks PageTail flag.
I think it doesn't affect THP and pass my test with THP enabling but Cced
Andrea for double check.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Steven Barrett <damentz@liquorix.net>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/page-writeback.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/page-writeback.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index 2cb01f6ec5d..b437fe6257b 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -1211,6 +1211,17 @@ int set_page_dirty(struct page *page) if (likely(mapping)) { int (*spd)(struct page *) = mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty; + /* + * readahead/lru_deactivate_page could remain + * PG_readahead/PG_reclaim due to race with end_page_writeback + * About readahead, if the page is written, the flags would be + * reset. So no problem. + * About lru_deactivate_page, if the page is redirty, the flag + * will be reset. So no problem. but if the page is used by readahead + * it will confuse readahead and make it restart the size rampup + * process. But it's a trivial problem. + */ + ClearPageReclaim(page); #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK if (!spd) spd = __set_page_dirty_buffers; @@ -1266,7 +1277,6 @@ int clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page *page) BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page)); - ClearPageReclaim(page); if (mapping && mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) { /* * Yes, Virginia, this is indeed insane. |