diff options
author | Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> | 2010-08-25 13:39:17 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> | 2010-08-27 11:12:29 -0700 |
commit | 72d7c3b33c980843e756681fb4867dc1efd62a76 (patch) | |
tree | 9607345d9fa055dd501aacf0772258fb72897035 /mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | |
parent | 301ff3e88ef9ff4bdb92f36a3e6170fce4c9dd34 (diff) |
x86: Use memblock to replace early_res
1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range
2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range
3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range.
4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too.
5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will
replace them all
6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care
7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill()
so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch()
-- corruption_check and mptable_update
-v2: Move reserve_brk() early
Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range()
that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and
memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for
memblock.memory.region array.
and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area()
So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area().
-v3: Move find_smp_config early
To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable
in right place.
-v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in
memblock.reserved already..
use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later.
-v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit
active_region for 32bit does include high pages
need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped()
-v6: Use current_limit instead
-v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L
-v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries
-v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline
Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Suggested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/sparse-vmemmap.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c index aa33fd67fa4..29d6cbffb28 100644 --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c @@ -220,18 +220,7 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map, if (vmemmap_buf_start) { /* need to free left buf */ -#ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM - free_early(__pa(vmemmap_buf_start), __pa(vmemmap_buf_end)); - if (vmemmap_buf_start < vmemmap_buf) { - char name[15]; - - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "MEMMAP %d", nodeid); - reserve_early_without_check(__pa(vmemmap_buf_start), - __pa(vmemmap_buf), name); - } -#else free_bootmem(__pa(vmemmap_buf), vmemmap_buf_end - vmemmap_buf); -#endif vmemmap_buf = NULL; vmemmap_buf_end = NULL; } |