summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>2008-02-14 14:28:09 -0800
committerChristoph Lameter <christoph@stapp.engr.sgi.com>2008-02-14 15:30:02 -0800
commit331dc558fa020451ff773973cee855fd721aa88e (patch)
tree12adf10a7e53c8d07835487694d8180b991304cd /mm
parent71c7a06ff0a2ba0434ace4d7aa679537c4211d9d (diff)
slub: Support 4k kmallocs again to compensate for page allocator slowness
Currently we hand off PAGE_SIZEd kmallocs to the page allocator in the mistaken belief that the page allocator can handle these allocations effectively. However, measurements indicate a minimum slowdown by the factor of 8 (and that is only SMP, NUMA is much worse) vs the slub fastpath which causes regressions in tbench. Increase the number of kmalloc caches by one so that we again handle 4k kmallocs directly from slub. 4k page buffering for the page allocator will be performed by slub like done by slab. At some point the page allocator fastpath should be fixed. A lot of the kernel would benefit from a faster ability to allocate a single page. If that is done then the 4k allocs may again be forwarded to the page allocator and this patch could be reverted. Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r--mm/slub.c18
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 644fd0aaeaf..4b3895cb90e 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2517,11 +2517,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_destroy);
* Kmalloc subsystem
*******************************************************************/
-struct kmem_cache kmalloc_caches[PAGE_SHIFT] __cacheline_aligned;
+struct kmem_cache kmalloc_caches[PAGE_SHIFT + 1] __cacheline_aligned;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmalloc_caches);
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
-static struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_caches_dma[PAGE_SHIFT];
+static struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_caches_dma[PAGE_SHIFT + 1];
#endif
static int __init setup_slub_min_order(char *str)
@@ -2703,7 +2703,7 @@ void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
{
struct kmem_cache *s;
- if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE / 2))
+ if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE))
return kmalloc_large(size, flags);
s = get_slab(size, flags);
@@ -2720,7 +2720,7 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
{
struct kmem_cache *s;
- if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE / 2))
+ if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE))
return kmalloc_large(size, flags);
s = get_slab(size, flags);
@@ -3032,7 +3032,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
caches++;
}
- for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i < PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
+ for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
create_kmalloc_cache(&kmalloc_caches[i],
"kmalloc", 1 << i, GFP_KERNEL);
caches++;
@@ -3059,7 +3059,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
slab_state = UP;
/* Provide the correct kmalloc names now that the caches are up */
- for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i < PAGE_SHIFT; i++)
+ for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= PAGE_SHIFT; i++)
kmalloc_caches[i]. name =
kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "kmalloc-%d", 1 << i);
@@ -3088,7 +3088,7 @@ static int slab_unmergeable(struct kmem_cache *s)
if (slub_nomerge || (s->flags & SLUB_NEVER_MERGE))
return 1;
- if ((s->flags & __PAGE_ALLOC_FALLBACK)
+ if ((s->flags & __PAGE_ALLOC_FALLBACK))
return 1;
if (s->ctor)
@@ -3252,7 +3252,7 @@ void *__kmalloc_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags, void *caller)
{
struct kmem_cache *s;
- if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE / 2))
+ if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE))
return kmalloc_large(size, gfpflags);
s = get_slab(size, gfpflags);
@@ -3268,7 +3268,7 @@ void *__kmalloc_node_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags,
{
struct kmem_cache *s;
- if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE / 2))
+ if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE))
return kmalloc_large(size, gfpflags);
s = get_slab(size, gfpflags);