writeback: optimize periodic bdi thread wakeups

Whe the first inode for a bdi is marked dirty, we wake up the bdi thread which
should take care of the periodic background write-out. However, the write-out
will actually start only 'dirty_writeback_interval' centisecs later, so we can
delay the wake-up.

This change was requested by Nick Piggin who pointed out that if we delay the
wake-up, we weed out 2 unnecessary contex switches, which matters because
'__mark_inode_dirty()' is a hot-path function.

This patch introduces a new function - 'bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed()', which
sets up a timer to wake-up the bdi thread and returns. So the wake-up is
delayed.

We also delete the timer in bdi threads just before writing-back. And
synchronously delete it when unregistering bdi. At the unregister point the bdi
does not have any users, so no one can arm it again.

Since now we take 'bdi->wb_lock' in the timer, which can execute in softirq
context, we have to use 'spin_lock_bh()' for 'bdi->wb_lock'. This patch makes
this change as well.

This patch also moves the 'bdi_wb_init()' function down in the file to avoid
forward-declaration of 'bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed()'.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

1 files changed, 57 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index a9a08d88a74..cfff7225138 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -248,17 +248,6 @@ static int __init default_bdi_init(void)
 }
 subsys_initcall(default_bdi_init);
 
-static void bdi_wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
-{
-	memset(wb, 0, sizeof(*wb));
-
-	wb->bdi = bdi;
-	wb->last_old_flush = jiffies;
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_dirty);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_io);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_more_io);
-}
-
 int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
 	return wb_has_dirty_io(&bdi->wb);
@@ -316,6 +305,43 @@ static void sync_supers_timer_fn(unsigned long unused)
 	bdi_arm_supers_timer();
 }
 
+static void wakeup_timer_fn(unsigned long data)
+{
+	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = (struct backing_dev_info *)data;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
+	if (bdi->wb.task) {
+		wake_up_process(bdi->wb.task);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * When bdi tasks are inactive for long time, they are killed.
+		 * In this case we have to wake-up the forker thread which
+		 * should create and run the bdi thread.
+		 */
+		wake_up_process(default_backing_dev_info.wb.task);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function is used when the first inode for this bdi is marked dirty. It
+ * wakes-up the corresponding bdi thread which should then take care of the
+ * periodic background write-out of dirty inodes. Since the write-out would
+ * starts only 'dirty_writeback_interval' centisecs from now anyway, we just
+ * set up a timer which wakes the bdi thread up later.
+ *
+ * Note, we wouldn't bother setting up the timer, but this function is on the
+ * fast-path (used by '__mark_inode_dirty()'), so we save few context switches
+ * by delaying the wake-up.
+ */
+void bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+	unsigned long timeout;
+
+	timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);
+	mod_timer(&bdi->wb.wakeup_timer, jiffies + timeout);
+}
+
 /*
  * Calculate the longest interval (jiffies) bdi threads are allowed to be
  * inactive.
@@ -353,8 +379,10 @@ static int bdi_forker_thread(void *ptr)
 		 * Temporary measure, we want to make sure we don't see
 		 * dirty data on the default backing_dev_info
 		 */
-		if (wb_has_dirty_io(me) || !list_empty(&me->bdi->work_list))
+		if (wb_has_dirty_io(me) || !list_empty(&me->bdi->work_list)) {
+			del_timer(&me->wakeup_timer);
 			wb_do_writeback(me, 0);
+		}
 
 		spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock);
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
@@ -386,7 +414,7 @@ static int bdi_forker_thread(void *ptr)
 				break;
 			}
 
-			spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock);
+			spin_lock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
 			/*
 			 * If there is no work to do and the bdi thread was
 			 * inactive long enough - kill it. The wb_lock is taken
@@ -403,7 +431,7 @@ static int bdi_forker_thread(void *ptr)
 				action = KILL_THREAD;
 				break;
 			}
-			spin_unlock(&bdi->wb_lock);
+			spin_unlock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
 		}
 		spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
 
@@ -427,9 +455,9 @@ static int bdi_forker_thread(void *ptr)
 				 * The spinlock makes sure we do not lose
 				 * wake-ups when racing with 'bdi_queue_work()'.
 				 */
-				spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock);
+				spin_lock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
 				bdi->wb.task = task;
-				spin_unlock(&bdi->wb_lock);
+				spin_unlock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
 			}
 			break;
 
@@ -586,6 +614,7 @@ void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 	if (bdi->dev) {
 		trace_writeback_bdi_unregister(bdi);
 		bdi_prune_sb(bdi);
+		del_timer_sync(&bdi->wb.wakeup_timer);
 
 		if (!bdi_cap_flush_forker(bdi))
 			bdi_wb_shutdown(bdi);
@@ -596,6 +625,18 @@ void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_unregister);
 
+static void bdi_wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+	memset(wb, 0, sizeof(*wb));
+
+	wb->bdi = bdi;
+	wb->last_old_flush = jiffies;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_dirty);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_io);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_more_io);
+	setup_timer(&wb->wakeup_timer, wakeup_timer_fn, (unsigned long)bdi);
+}
+
 int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
 	int i, err;