diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2013-02-27 08:36:04 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2013-02-27 08:36:04 -0800 |
commit | 09884964335e85e897876d17783c2ad33cf8a2e0 (patch) | |
tree | 4cf0ea71bb20c8d81147614e90e53df3368405e5 /mm | |
parent | d895cb1af15c04c522a25c79cc429076987c089b (diff) |
mm: do not grow the stack vma just because of an overrun on preceding vma
The stack vma is designed to grow automatically (marked with VM_GROWSUP
or VM_GROWSDOWN depending on architecture) when an access is made beyond
the existing boundary. However, particularly if you have not limited
your stack at all ("ulimit -s unlimited"), this can cause the stack to
grow even if the access was really just one past *another* segment.
And that's wrong, especially since we first grow the segment, but then
immediately later enforce the stack guard page on the last page of the
segment. So _despite_ first growing the stack segment as a result of
the access, the kernel will then make the access cause a SIGSEGV anyway!
So do the same logic as the guard page check does, and consider an
access to within one page of the next segment to be a bad access, rather
than growing the stack to abut the next segment.
Reported-and-tested-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/mmap.c | 27 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index 37a1fcac029..2664a47cec9 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -2185,9 +2185,28 @@ int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, return error; } +/* + * Note how expand_stack() refuses to expand the stack all the way to + * abut the next virtual mapping, *unless* that mapping itself is also + * a stack mapping. We want to leave room for a guard page, after all + * (the guard page itself is not added here, that is done by the + * actual page faulting logic) + * + * This matches the behavior of the guard page logic (see mm/memory.c: + * check_stack_guard_page()), which only allows the guard page to be + * removed under these circumstances. + */ #ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP int expand_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address) { + struct vm_area_struct *next; + + address &= PAGE_MASK; + next = vma->vm_next; + if (next && next->vm_start == address + PAGE_SIZE) { + if (!(next->vm_flags & VM_GROWSUP)) + return -ENOMEM; + } return expand_upwards(vma, address); } @@ -2209,6 +2228,14 @@ find_extend_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) #else int expand_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address) { + struct vm_area_struct *prev; + + address &= PAGE_MASK; + prev = vma->vm_prev; + if (prev && prev->vm_end == address) { + if (!(prev->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN)) + return -ENOMEM; + } return expand_downwards(vma, address); } |