diff options
author | Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com> | 2006-02-11 17:55:55 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2006-02-11 21:41:11 -0800 |
commit | 2903fb1694dcb08a3c1d9d823cfae7ba30e66cd3 (patch) | |
tree | 7d794e0997e935033354f3c3ffd81c1f31354db3 /mm | |
parent | 072eaa5d9cc3e63f567ffd9ad87b36194fdd8010 (diff) |
[PATCH] vmscan: skip reclaim_mapped determination if we do not swap
This puts the variables and the way to get to reclaim_mapped in one block.
And allows zone_reclaim or other things to skip the determination (maybe
this whole block of code does not belong into refill_inactive_zone()?)
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 75 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 58ed5125b1a..1838c15ca4f 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1195,9 +1195,47 @@ refill_inactive_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc) struct page *page; struct pagevec pvec; int reclaim_mapped = 0; - long mapped_ratio; - long distress; - long swap_tendency; + + if (unlikely(sc->may_swap)) { + long mapped_ratio; + long distress; + long swap_tendency; + + /* + * `distress' is a measure of how much trouble we're having + * reclaiming pages. 0 -> no problems. 100 -> great trouble. + */ + distress = 100 >> zone->prev_priority; + + /* + * The point of this algorithm is to decide when to start + * reclaiming mapped memory instead of just pagecache. Work out + * how much memory + * is mapped. + */ + mapped_ratio = (sc->nr_mapped * 100) / total_memory; + + /* + * Now decide how much we really want to unmap some pages. The + * mapped ratio is downgraded - just because there's a lot of + * mapped memory doesn't necessarily mean that page reclaim + * isn't succeeding. + * + * The distress ratio is important - we don't want to start + * going oom. + * + * A 100% value of vm_swappiness overrides this algorithm + * altogether. + */ + swap_tendency = mapped_ratio / 2 + distress + vm_swappiness; + + /* + * Now use this metric to decide whether to start moving mapped + * memory onto the inactive list. + */ + if (swap_tendency >= 100) + reclaim_mapped = 1; + } lru_add_drain(); spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); @@ -1207,37 +1245,6 @@ refill_inactive_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc) zone->nr_active -= pgmoved; spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); - /* - * `distress' is a measure of how much trouble we're having reclaiming - * pages. 0 -> no problems. 100 -> great trouble. - */ - distress = 100 >> zone->prev_priority; - - /* - * The point of this algorithm is to decide when to start reclaiming - * mapped memory instead of just pagecache. Work out how much memory - * is mapped. - */ - mapped_ratio = (sc->nr_mapped * 100) / total_memory; - - /* - * Now decide how much we really want to unmap some pages. The mapped - * ratio is downgraded - just because there's a lot of mapped memory - * doesn't necessarily mean that page reclaim isn't succeeding. - * - * The distress ratio is important - we don't want to start going oom. - * - * A 100% value of vm_swappiness overrides this algorithm altogether. - */ - swap_tendency = mapped_ratio / 2 + distress + vm_swappiness; - - /* - * Now use this metric to decide whether to start moving mapped memory - * onto the inactive list. - */ - if (swap_tendency >= 100 && sc->may_swap) - reclaim_mapped = 1; - while (!list_empty(&l_hold)) { cond_resched(); page = lru_to_page(&l_hold); |