summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/ieee802154/nl_policy.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>2012-07-04 12:06:16 +0000
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2012-07-09 00:12:42 -0700
commitb93984c9afacd4fe32b785d52a93660d91202b10 (patch)
treebb140d9abc23831e0771940febdd4392aeffe689 /net/ieee802154/nl_policy.c
parentd4e41649434cd6db2e69783130cba81886dac97f (diff)
netdev/phy: Fixup lockdep warnings in mdio-mux.c
With lockdep enabled we get: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 3.4.4-Cavium-Octeon+ #313 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- kworker/u:1/36 is trying to acquire lock: (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff813da7e8>] mdio_mux_read+0x38/0xa0 but task is already holding lock: (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff813d79e4>] mdiobus_read+0x44/0x88 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&bus->mdio_lock); lock(&bus->mdio_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation . . . This is a false positive, since we are indeed using 'nested' locking, we need to use mutex_lock_nested(). Now in theory we can stack multiple MDIO multiplexers, but that would require passing the nesting level (which is difficult to know) to mutex_lock_nested(). Instead we assume the simple case of a single level of nesting. Since these are only warning messages, it isn't so important to solve the general case. Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ieee802154/nl_policy.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions