diff options
author | Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com> | 2007-06-04 19:05:57 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net> | 2007-06-07 13:42:46 -0700 |
commit | 4aa2e62c45b5ca08be2d0d3c0744d7585b56e860 (patch) | |
tree | 16649593d55f3df4dac54227fcda28bb4fb49f17 /net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | |
parent | b00b4bf94edb42852d55619af453588b2de2dc5e (diff) |
xfrm: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD
Currently we check for permission before deleting entries from SAD and
SPD, (see security_xfrm_policy_delete() security_xfrm_state_delete())
However we are not checking for authorization when flushing the SPD and
the SAD completely. It was perhaps missed in the original security hooks
patch.
This patch adds a security check when flushing entries from the SAD and
SPD. It runs the entire database and checks each entry for a denial.
If the process attempting the flush is unable to remove all of the
entries a denial is logged the the flush function returns an error
without removing anything.
This is particularly useful when a process may need to create or delete
its own xfrm entries used for things like labeled networking but that
same process should not be able to delete other entries or flush the
entire database.
Signed-off-by: Joy Latten<latten@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 63 |
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index 64a375178c5..157bfbd250b 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -834,11 +834,67 @@ struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_byid(u8 type, int dir, u32 id, int delete, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_policy_byid); -void xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info) +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM +static inline int +xfrm_policy_flush_secctx_check(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info) { - int dir; + int dir, err = 0; + + for (dir = 0; dir < XFRM_POLICY_MAX; dir++) { + struct xfrm_policy *pol; + struct hlist_node *entry; + int i; + + hlist_for_each_entry(pol, entry, + &xfrm_policy_inexact[dir], bydst) { + if (pol->type != type) + continue; + err = security_xfrm_policy_delete(pol); + if (err) { + xfrm_audit_log(audit_info->loginuid, + audit_info->secid, + AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_DELSPD, 0, + pol, NULL); + return err; + } + } + for (i = xfrm_policy_bydst[dir].hmask; i >= 0; i--) { + hlist_for_each_entry(pol, entry, + xfrm_policy_bydst[dir].table + i, + bydst) { + if (pol->type != type) + continue; + err = security_xfrm_policy_delete(pol); + if (err) { + xfrm_audit_log(audit_info->loginuid, + audit_info->secid, + AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_DELSPD, + 0, pol, NULL); + return err; + } + } + } + } + return err; +} +#else +static inline int +xfrm_policy_flush_secctx_check(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + +int xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info) +{ + int dir, err = 0; write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock); + + err = xfrm_policy_flush_secctx_check(type, audit_info); + if (err) + goto out; + for (dir = 0; dir < XFRM_POLICY_MAX; dir++) { struct xfrm_policy *pol; struct hlist_node *entry; @@ -891,7 +947,9 @@ void xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info) xfrm_policy_count[dir] -= killed; } atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid); +out: write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock); + return err; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_policy_flush); @@ -2583,4 +2641,3 @@ restore_state: } EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_migrate); #endif - |