perf/record: simplify TRACE_INFO tracepoint check

Fix a couple of inefficiencies and redundancies related to
have_tracepoints() and its use when checking whether to write
TRACE_INFO.

First, there's no need to use get_tracepoints_path() in
have_tracepoints() - we really just want the part that checks whether
any attributes correspondo to tracepoints.

Second, we really don't care about raw_samples per se - tracepoints
are always raw_samples.  In any case, the have_tracepoints() check
should be sufficient to decide whether or not to write TRACE_INFO.

Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1273030770.6383.6.camel@tropicana>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 0ff67d1c475..d3981ac50e1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -560,17 +560,8 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
 			return err;
 	}
 
-	if (raw_samples && have_tracepoints(attrs, nr_counters)) {
+	if (have_tracepoints(attrs, nr_counters))
 		perf_header__set_feat(&session->header, HEADER_TRACE_INFO);
-	} else {
-		for (i = 0; i < nr_counters; i++) {
-			if (attrs[i].sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW &&
-				attrs[i].type == PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
-				perf_header__set_feat(&session->header, HEADER_TRACE_INFO);
-				break;
-			}
-		}
-	}
 
 	atexit(atexit_header);