diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ext3/Kconfig | 32 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext3/Kconfig b/fs/ext3/Kconfig index fb3c1a21b13..522b15498f4 100644 --- a/fs/ext3/Kconfig +++ b/fs/ext3/Kconfig @@ -29,23 +29,25 @@ config EXT3_FS module will be called ext3. config EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED - bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3 (legacy option)" + bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3" depends on EXT3_FS help - If a filesystem does not explicitly specify a data ordering - mode, and the journal capability allowed it, ext3 used to - historically default to 'data=ordered'. - - That was a rather unfortunate choice, because it leads to all - kinds of latency problems, and the 'data=writeback' mode is more - appropriate these days. - - You should probably always answer 'n' here, and if you really - want to use 'data=ordered' mode, set it in the filesystem itself - with 'tune2fs -o journal_data_ordered'. - - But if you really want to enable the legacy default, you can do - so by answering 'y' to this question. + The journal mode options for ext3 have different tradeoffs + between when data is guaranteed to be on disk and + performance. The use of "data=writeback" can cause + unwritten data to appear in files after an system crash or + power failure, which can be a security issue. However, + "data=ordered" mode can also result in major performance + problems, including seconds-long delays before an fsync() + call returns. For details, see: + + http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext3_data_mode_tradeoffs + + If you have been historically happy with ext3's performance, + data=ordered mode will be a safe choice and you should + answer 'y' here. If you understand the reliability and data + privacy issues of data=writeback and are willing to make + that trade off, answer 'n'. config EXT3_FS_XATTR bool "Ext3 extended attributes" |