diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 16 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 29 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 17 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/trace/Kconfig | 2 |
4 files changed, 53 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c index 632e5dc9c9c..e638689279d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c @@ -613,8 +613,8 @@ static int x86_setup_perfctr(struct perf_event *event) /* * Branch tracing: */ - if ((attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS) && - (hwc->sample_period == 1)) { + if (attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS && + !attr->freq && hwc->sample_period == 1) { /* BTS is not supported by this architecture. */ if (!x86_pmu.bts_active) return -EOPNOTSUPP; @@ -1288,6 +1288,16 @@ static int x86_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events); + /* + * Some chipsets need to unmask the LVTPC in a particular spot + * inside the nmi handler. As a result, the unmasking was pushed + * into all the nmi handlers. + * + * This generic handler doesn't seem to have any issues where the + * unmasking occurs so it was left at the top. + */ + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI); + for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_counters; idx++) { if (!test_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask)) { /* @@ -1374,8 +1384,6 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self, return NOTIFY_DONE; } - apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI); - handled = x86_pmu.handle_irq(args->regs); if (!handled) return NOTIFY_DONE; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c index 43fa20b1381..e61539b07d2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct intel_percore { /* * Intel PerfMon, used on Core and later. */ -static const u64 intel_perfmon_event_map[] = +static u64 intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX] __read_mostly = { [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES] = 0x003c, [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS] = 0x00c0, @@ -933,6 +933,16 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events); + /* + * Some chipsets need to unmask the LVTPC in a particular spot + * inside the nmi handler. As a result, the unmasking was pushed + * into all the nmi handlers. + * + * This handler doesn't seem to have any issues with the unmasking + * so it was left at the top. + */ + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI); + intel_pmu_disable_all(); handled = intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer(); status = intel_pmu_get_status(); @@ -998,6 +1008,9 @@ intel_bts_constraints(struct perf_event *event) struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; unsigned int hw_event, bts_event; + if (event->attr.freq) + return NULL; + hw_event = hwc->config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK; bts_event = x86_pmu.event_map(PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS); @@ -1305,7 +1318,7 @@ static void intel_clovertown_quirks(void) * AJ106 could possibly be worked around by not allowing LBR * usage from PEBS, including the fixup. * AJ68 could possibly be worked around by always programming - * a pebs_event_reset[0] value and coping with the lost events. + * a pebs_event_reset[0] value and coping with the lost events. * * But taken together it might just make sense to not enable PEBS on * these chips. @@ -1409,6 +1422,18 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void) x86_pmu.percore_constraints = intel_nehalem_percore_constraints; x86_pmu.enable_all = intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all; x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_nehalem_extra_regs; + + if (ebx & 0x40) { + /* + * Erratum AAJ80 detected, we work it around by using + * the BR_MISP_EXEC.ANY event. This will over-count + * branch-misses, but it's still much better than the + * architectural event which is often completely bogus: + */ + intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x7f89; + + pr_cont("erratum AAJ80 worked around, "); + } pr_cont("Nehalem events, "); break; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c index d1f77e2934a..e93fcd55fae 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c @@ -950,11 +950,20 @@ static int p4_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) x86_pmu_stop(event, 0); } - if (handled) { - /* p4 quirk: unmask it again */ - apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, apic_read(APIC_LVTPC) & ~APIC_LVT_MASKED); + if (handled) inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs); - } + + /* + * When dealing with the unmasking of the LVTPC on P4 perf hw, it has + * been observed that the OVF bit flag has to be cleared first _before_ + * the LVTPC can be unmasked. + * + * The reason is the NMI line will continue to be asserted while the OVF + * bit is set. This causes a second NMI to generate if the LVTPC is + * unmasked before the OVF bit is cleared, leading to unknown NMI + * messages. + */ + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI); return handled; } diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig index 61d7d59f4a1..2ad39e556cb 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ if FTRACE config FUNCTION_TRACER bool "Kernel Function Tracer" depends on HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER - select FRAME_POINTER if !ARM_UNWIND && !S390 + select FRAME_POINTER if !ARM_UNWIND && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE select KALLSYMS select GENERIC_TRACER select CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER |