diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c | 155 |
1 files changed, 81 insertions, 74 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c index 41ec7729edd..04bf1ba607f 100644 --- a/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c @@ -1577,88 +1577,95 @@ next_entry: EXPORT_SYMBOL(pccard_loop_tuple); -/*====================================================================== - - This tries to determine if a card has a sensible CIS. It returns - the number of tuples in the CIS, or 0 if the CIS looks bad. The - checks include making sure several critical tuples are present and - valid; seeing if the total number of tuples is reasonable; and - looking for tuples that use reserved codes. - -======================================================================*/ - +/** + * pccard_validate_cis() - check whether card has a sensible CIS + * @s: the struct pcmcia_socket we are to check + * @info: returns the number of tuples in the (valid) CIS, or 0 + * + * This tries to determine if a card has a sensible CIS. In @info, it + * returns the number of tuples in the CIS, or 0 if the CIS looks bad. The + * checks include making sure several critical tuples are present and + * valid; seeing if the total number of tuples is reasonable; and + * looking for tuples that use reserved codes. + * + * The function returns 0 on success. + */ int pccard_validate_cis(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int *info) { - tuple_t *tuple; - cisparse_t *p; - unsigned int count = 0; - int ret, reserved, dev_ok = 0, ident_ok = 0; + tuple_t *tuple; + cisparse_t *p; + unsigned int count = 0; + int ret, reserved, dev_ok = 0, ident_ok = 0; - if (!s) - return -EINVAL; + if (!s) + return -EINVAL; - /* We do not want to validate the CIS cache... */ - destroy_cis_cache(s); + /* We do not want to validate the CIS cache... */ + destroy_cis_cache(s); - tuple = kmalloc(sizeof(*tuple), GFP_KERNEL); - if (tuple == NULL) { - dev_printk(KERN_WARNING, &s->dev, "no memory to validate CIS\n"); - return -ENOMEM; - } - p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL); - if (p == NULL) { - kfree(tuple); - dev_printk(KERN_WARNING, &s->dev, "no memory to validate CIS\n"); - return -ENOMEM; - } + tuple = kmalloc(sizeof(*tuple), GFP_KERNEL); + if (tuple == NULL) { + dev_warn(&s->dev, "no memory to validate CIS\n"); + return -ENOMEM; + } + p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL); + if (p == NULL) { + kfree(tuple); + dev_warn(&s->dev, "no memory to validate CIS\n"); + return -ENOMEM; + } - count = reserved = 0; - tuple->DesiredTuple = RETURN_FIRST_TUPLE; - tuple->Attributes = TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON; - ret = pccard_get_first_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, tuple); - if (ret != 0) - goto done; - - /* First tuple should be DEVICE; we should really have either that - or a CFTABLE_ENTRY of some sort */ - if ((tuple->TupleCode == CISTPL_DEVICE) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY, p) == 0) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY_CB, p) == 0)) - dev_ok++; - - /* All cards should have a MANFID tuple, and/or a VERS_1 or VERS_2 - tuple, for card identification. Certain old D-Link and Linksys - cards have only a broken VERS_2 tuple; hence the bogus test. */ - if ((pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_MANFID, p) == 0) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_VERS_1, p) == 0) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_VERS_2, p) != -ENOSPC)) - ident_ok++; - - if (!dev_ok && !ident_ok) - goto done; - - for (count = 1; count < MAX_TUPLES; count++) { - ret = pccard_get_next_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, tuple); + count = reserved = 0; + tuple->DesiredTuple = RETURN_FIRST_TUPLE; + tuple->Attributes = TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON; + ret = pccard_get_first_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, tuple); if (ret != 0) - break; - if (((tuple->TupleCode > 0x23) && (tuple->TupleCode < 0x40)) || - ((tuple->TupleCode > 0x47) && (tuple->TupleCode < 0x80)) || - ((tuple->TupleCode > 0x90) && (tuple->TupleCode < 0xff))) - reserved++; - } - if ((count == MAX_TUPLES) || (reserved > 5) || - ((!dev_ok || !ident_ok) && (count > 10))) - count = 0; + goto done; + + /* First tuple should be DEVICE; we should really have either that + or a CFTABLE_ENTRY of some sort */ + if ((tuple->TupleCode == CISTPL_DEVICE) || + (!pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY, p)) || + (!pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY_CB, p))) + dev_ok++; + + /* All cards should have a MANFID tuple, and/or a VERS_1 or VERS_2 + tuple, for card identification. Certain old D-Link and Linksys + cards have only a broken VERS_2 tuple; hence the bogus test. */ + if ((pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_MANFID, p) == 0) || + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_VERS_1, p) == 0) || + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_VERS_2, p) != -ENOSPC)) + ident_ok++; + + if (!dev_ok && !ident_ok) + goto done; + + for (count = 1; count < MAX_TUPLES; count++) { + ret = pccard_get_next_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, tuple); + if (ret != 0) + break; + if (((tuple->TupleCode > 0x23) && (tuple->TupleCode < 0x40)) || + ((tuple->TupleCode > 0x47) && (tuple->TupleCode < 0x80)) || + ((tuple->TupleCode > 0x90) && (tuple->TupleCode < 0xff))) + reserved++; + } + if ((count == MAX_TUPLES) || (reserved > 5) || + ((!dev_ok || !ident_ok) && (count > 10))) + count = 0; + + ret = 0; done: - /* invalidate CIS cache on failure */ - if (!dev_ok || !ident_ok || !count) - destroy_cis_cache(s); - - if (info) - *info = count; - kfree(tuple); - kfree(p); - return 0; + /* invalidate CIS cache on failure */ + if (!dev_ok || !ident_ok || !count) { + destroy_cis_cache(s); + ret = -EIO; + } + + if (info) + *info = count; + kfree(tuple); + kfree(p); + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(pccard_validate_cis); |