diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | net/mac80211/rx.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c index 12cbb4df81a..9595e564bad 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/rx.c +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c @@ -628,26 +628,6 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_reorder_release(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, tid_agg_rx->buf_size; } - /* - * Disable the reorder release timer for now. - * - * The current implementation lacks a proper locking scheme - * which would protect vital statistic and debug counters - * from being updated by two different but concurrent BHs. - * - * More information about the topic is available from: - * - thread: http://marc.info/?t=128635927000001 - * - * What was wrong: - * => http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128636170811964 - * "Basically the thing is that until your patch, the data - * in the struct didn't actually need locking because it - * was accessed by the RX path only which is not concurrent." - * - * List of what needs to be fixed: - * => http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128656352920957 - * - if (tid_agg_rx->stored_mpdu_num) { j = index = seq_sub(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num, tid_agg_rx->ssn) % tid_agg_rx->buf_size; @@ -666,10 +646,6 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_reorder_release(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, } else { del_timer(&tid_agg_rx->reorder_timer); } - */ - -set_release_timer: - return; } /* |