diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt | 74 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c | 110 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/seccomp.c | 13 |
3 files changed, 137 insertions, 60 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt b/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt index 597c3c58137..1e469ef7577 100644 --- a/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt +++ b/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt @@ -95,12 +95,15 @@ SECCOMP_RET_KILL: SECCOMP_RET_TRAP: Results in the kernel sending a SIGSYS signal to the triggering - task without executing the system call. The kernel will - rollback the register state to just before the system call - entry such that a signal handler in the task will be able to - inspect the ucontext_t->uc_mcontext registers and emulate - system call success or failure upon return from the signal - handler. + task without executing the system call. siginfo->si_call_addr + will show the address of the system call instruction, and + siginfo->si_syscall and siginfo->si_arch will indicate which + syscall was attempted. The program counter will be as though + the syscall happened (i.e. it will not point to the syscall + instruction). The return value register will contain an arch- + dependent value -- if resuming execution, set it to something + sensible. (The architecture dependency is because replacing + it with -ENOSYS could overwrite some useful information.) The SECCOMP_RET_DATA portion of the return value will be passed as si_errno. @@ -123,6 +126,18 @@ SECCOMP_RET_TRACE: the BPF program return value will be available to the tracer via PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG. + The tracer can skip the system call by changing the syscall number + to -1. Alternatively, the tracer can change the system call + requested by changing the system call to a valid syscall number. If + the tracer asks to skip the system call, then the system call will + appear to return the value that the tracer puts in the return value + register. + + The seccomp check will not be run again after the tracer is + notified. (This means that seccomp-based sandboxes MUST NOT + allow use of ptrace, even of other sandboxed processes, without + extreme care; ptracers can use this mechanism to escape.) + SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW: Results in the system call being executed. @@ -161,3 +176,50 @@ architecture supports both ptrace_event and seccomp, it will be able to support seccomp filter with minor fixup: SIGSYS support and seccomp return value checking. Then it must just add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER to its arch-specific Kconfig. + + + +Caveats +------- + +The vDSO can cause some system calls to run entirely in userspace, +leading to surprises when you run programs on different machines that +fall back to real syscalls. To minimize these surprises on x86, make +sure you test with +/sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource set to +something like acpi_pm. + +On x86-64, vsyscall emulation is enabled by default. (vsyscalls are +legacy variants on vDSO calls.) Currently, emulated vsyscalls will honor seccomp, with a few oddities: + +- A return value of SECCOMP_RET_TRAP will set a si_call_addr pointing to + the vsyscall entry for the given call and not the address after the + 'syscall' instruction. Any code which wants to restart the call + should be aware that (a) a ret instruction has been emulated and (b) + trying to resume the syscall will again trigger the standard vsyscall + emulation security checks, making resuming the syscall mostly + pointless. + +- A return value of SECCOMP_RET_TRACE will signal the tracer as usual, + but the syscall may not be changed to another system call using the + orig_rax register. It may only be changed to -1 order to skip the + currently emulated call. Any other change MAY terminate the process. + The rip value seen by the tracer will be the syscall entry address; + this is different from normal behavior. The tracer MUST NOT modify + rip or rsp. (Do not rely on other changes terminating the process. + They might work. For example, on some kernels, choosing a syscall + that only exists in future kernels will be correctly emulated (by + returning -ENOSYS). + +To detect this quirky behavior, check for addr & ~0x0C00 == +0xFFFFFFFFFF600000. (For SECCOMP_RET_TRACE, use rip. For +SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, use siginfo->si_call_addr.) Do not check any other +condition: future kernels may improve vsyscall emulation and current +kernels in vsyscall=native mode will behave differently, but the +instructions at 0xF...F600{0,4,8,C}00 will not be system calls in these +cases. + +Note that modern systems are unlikely to use vsyscalls at all -- they +are a legacy feature and they are considerably slower than standard +syscalls. New code will use the vDSO, and vDSO-issued system calls +are indistinguishable from normal system calls. diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c index 8d141b30904..b2e58a248b3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c @@ -136,19 +136,6 @@ static int addr_to_vsyscall_nr(unsigned long addr) return nr; } -#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP -static int vsyscall_seccomp(struct task_struct *tsk, int syscall_nr) -{ - if (!seccomp_mode(&tsk->seccomp)) - return 0; - task_pt_regs(tsk)->orig_ax = syscall_nr; - task_pt_regs(tsk)->ax = syscall_nr; - return __secure_computing(syscall_nr); -} -#else -#define vsyscall_seccomp(_tsk, _nr) 0 -#endif - static bool write_ok_or_segv(unsigned long ptr, size_t size) { /* @@ -181,10 +168,9 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address) { struct task_struct *tsk; unsigned long caller; - int vsyscall_nr; + int vsyscall_nr, syscall_nr, tmp; int prev_sig_on_uaccess_error; long ret; - int skip; /* * No point in checking CS -- the only way to get here is a user mode @@ -216,56 +202,84 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address) } tsk = current; - /* - * With a real vsyscall, page faults cause SIGSEGV. We want to - * preserve that behavior to make writing exploits harder. - */ - prev_sig_on_uaccess_error = current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error; - current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error = 1; /* + * Check for access_ok violations and find the syscall nr. + * * NULL is a valid user pointer (in the access_ok sense) on 32-bit and * 64-bit, so we don't need to special-case it here. For all the * vsyscalls, NULL means "don't write anything" not "write it at * address 0". */ - ret = -EFAULT; - skip = 0; switch (vsyscall_nr) { case 0: - skip = vsyscall_seccomp(tsk, __NR_gettimeofday); - if (skip) - break; - if (!write_ok_or_segv(regs->di, sizeof(struct timeval)) || - !write_ok_or_segv(regs->si, sizeof(struct timezone))) - break; + !write_ok_or_segv(regs->si, sizeof(struct timezone))) { + ret = -EFAULT; + goto check_fault; + } + + syscall_nr = __NR_gettimeofday; + break; + + case 1: + if (!write_ok_or_segv(regs->di, sizeof(time_t))) { + ret = -EFAULT; + goto check_fault; + } + + syscall_nr = __NR_time; + break; + + case 2: + if (!write_ok_or_segv(regs->di, sizeof(unsigned)) || + !write_ok_or_segv(regs->si, sizeof(unsigned))) { + ret = -EFAULT; + goto check_fault; + } + + syscall_nr = __NR_getcpu; + break; + } + + /* + * Handle seccomp. regs->ip must be the original value. + * See seccomp_send_sigsys and Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt. + * + * We could optimize the seccomp disabled case, but performance + * here doesn't matter. + */ + regs->orig_ax = syscall_nr; + regs->ax = -ENOSYS; + tmp = secure_computing(syscall_nr); + if ((!tmp && regs->orig_ax != syscall_nr) || regs->ip != address) { + warn_bad_vsyscall(KERN_DEBUG, regs, + "seccomp tried to change syscall nr or ip"); + do_exit(SIGSYS); + } + if (tmp) + goto do_ret; /* skip requested */ + /* + * With a real vsyscall, page faults cause SIGSEGV. We want to + * preserve that behavior to make writing exploits harder. + */ + prev_sig_on_uaccess_error = current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error; + current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error = 1; + + ret = -EFAULT; + switch (vsyscall_nr) { + case 0: ret = sys_gettimeofday( (struct timeval __user *)regs->di, (struct timezone __user *)regs->si); break; case 1: - skip = vsyscall_seccomp(tsk, __NR_time); - if (skip) - break; - - if (!write_ok_or_segv(regs->di, sizeof(time_t))) - break; - ret = sys_time((time_t __user *)regs->di); break; case 2: - skip = vsyscall_seccomp(tsk, __NR_getcpu); - if (skip) - break; - - if (!write_ok_or_segv(regs->di, sizeof(unsigned)) || - !write_ok_or_segv(regs->si, sizeof(unsigned))) - break; - ret = sys_getcpu((unsigned __user *)regs->di, (unsigned __user *)regs->si, NULL); @@ -274,12 +288,7 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address) current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error = prev_sig_on_uaccess_error; - if (skip) { - if ((long)regs->ax <= 0L) /* seccomp errno emulation */ - goto do_ret; - goto done; /* seccomp trace/trap */ - } - +check_fault: if (ret == -EFAULT) { /* Bad news -- userspace fed a bad pointer to a vsyscall. */ warn_bad_vsyscall(KERN_INFO, regs, @@ -302,7 +311,6 @@ do_ret: /* Emulate a ret instruction. */ regs->ip = caller; regs->sp += 8; -done: return true; sigsegv: diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index ee376beedaf..5af44b59377 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -396,25 +396,29 @@ int __secure_computing(int this_syscall) #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER case SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER: { int data; + struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current); ret = seccomp_run_filters(this_syscall); data = ret & SECCOMP_RET_DATA; ret &= SECCOMP_RET_ACTION; switch (ret) { case SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO: /* Set the low-order 16-bits as a errno. */ - syscall_set_return_value(current, task_pt_regs(current), + syscall_set_return_value(current, regs, -data, 0); goto skip; case SECCOMP_RET_TRAP: /* Show the handler the original registers. */ - syscall_rollback(current, task_pt_regs(current)); + syscall_rollback(current, regs); /* Let the filter pass back 16 bits of data. */ seccomp_send_sigsys(this_syscall, data); goto skip; case SECCOMP_RET_TRACE: /* Skip these calls if there is no tracer. */ - if (!ptrace_event_enabled(current, PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)) + if (!ptrace_event_enabled(current, PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)) { + syscall_set_return_value(current, regs, + -ENOSYS, 0); goto skip; + } /* Allow the BPF to provide the event message */ ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP, data); /* @@ -425,6 +429,9 @@ int __secure_computing(int this_syscall) */ if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) break; + if (syscall_get_nr(current, regs) < 0) + goto skip; /* Explicit request to skip. */ + return 0; case SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW: return 0; |