summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt74
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 89a47b5aff0..591e94448e6 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -6,6 +6,21 @@ be removed from this file.
---------------------------
+What: USER_SCHED
+When: 2.6.34
+
+Why: USER_SCHED was implemented as a proof of concept for group scheduling.
+ The effect of USER_SCHED can already be achieved from userspace with
+ the help of libcgroup. The removal of USER_SCHED will also simplify
+ the scheduler code with the removal of one major ifdef. There are also
+ issues USER_SCHED has with USER_NS. A decision was taken not to fix
+ those and instead remove USER_SCHED. Also new group scheduling
+ features will not be implemented for USER_SCHED.
+
+Who: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+
+---------------------------
+
What: PRISM54
When: 2.6.34
@@ -302,18 +317,6 @@ Who: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
---------------------------
-What: SCTP_GET_PEER_ADDRS_NUM_OLD, SCTP_GET_PEER_ADDRS_OLD,
- SCTP_GET_LOCAL_ADDRS_NUM_OLD, SCTP_GET_LOCAL_ADDRS_OLD
-When: June 2009
-Why: A newer version of the options have been introduced in 2005 that
- removes the limitions of the old API. The sctp library has been
- converted to use these new options at the same time. Any user
- space app that directly uses the old options should convert to using
- the new options.
-Who: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
----------------------------
-
What: Ability for non root users to shm_get hugetlb pages based on mlock
resource limits
When: 2.6.31
@@ -404,20 +407,19 @@ Who: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
---------------------------
-What: i2c-voodoo3 driver
-When: October 2009
-Why: Superseded by tdfxfb. I2C/DDC support used to live in a separate
- driver but this caused driver conflicts.
-Who: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
- Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
-
----------------------------
-
What: CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT
When: 2.6.33
Why: Should be implemented in userspace, policy daemon.
Who: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
+---------------------------
+
+What: CONFIG_INOTIFY
+When: 2.6.33
+Why: last user (audit) will be converted to the newer more generic
+ and more easily maintained fsnotify subsystem
+Who: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
+
----------------------------
What: lock_policy_rwsem_* and unlock_policy_rwsem_* will not be
@@ -451,3 +453,33 @@ Why: OSS sound_core grabs all legacy minors (0-255) of SOUND_MAJOR
will also allow making ALSA OSS emulation independent of
sound_core. The dependency will be broken then too.
Who: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: Support for VMware's guest paravirtuliazation technique [VMI] will be
+ dropped.
+When: 2.6.37 or earlier.
+Why: With the recent innovations in CPU hardware acceleration technologies
+ from Intel and AMD, VMware ran a few experiments to compare these
+ techniques to guest paravirtualization technique on VMware's platform.
+ These hardware assisted virtualization techniques have outperformed the
+ performance benefits provided by VMI in most of the workloads. VMware
+ expects that these hardware features will be ubiquitous in a couple of
+ years, as a result, VMware has started a phased retirement of this
+ feature from the hypervisor. We will be removing this feature from the
+ Kernel too. Right now we are targeting 2.6.37 but can retire earlier if
+ technical reasons (read opportunity to remove major chunk of pvops)
+ arise.
+
+ Please note that VMI has always been an optimization and non-VMI kernels
+ still work fine on VMware's platform.
+ Latest versions of VMware's product which support VMI are,
+ Workstation 7.0 and VSphere 4.0 on ESX side, future maintainence
+ releases for these products will continue supporting VMI.
+
+ For more details about VMI retirement take a look at this,
+ http://blogs.vmware.com/guestosguide/2009/09/vmi-retirement.html
+
+Who: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
+
+----------------------------