diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/memory-barriers.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 27 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt index f1dc4a21559..a4de88fb55f 100644 --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt @@ -757,10 +757,14 @@ SMP BARRIER PAIRING When dealing with CPU-CPU interactions, certain types of memory barrier should always be paired. A lack of appropriate pairing is almost certainly an error. -A write barrier should always be paired with a data dependency barrier or read -barrier, though a general barrier would also be viable. Similarly a read -barrier or a data dependency barrier should always be paired with at least an -write barrier, though, again, a general barrier is viable: +General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with +most other types of barriers, albeit without transitivity. An acquire +barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other +barriers, including of course general barriers. A write barrier pairs +with a data dependency barrier, an acquire barrier, a release barrier, +a read barrier, or a general barrier. Similarly a read barrier or a +data dependency barrier pairs with a write barrier, an acquire barrier, +a release barrier, or a general barrier: CPU 1 CPU 2 =============== =============== @@ -1893,6 +1897,21 @@ between the STORE to indicate the event and the STORE to set TASK_RUNNING: <general barrier> STORE current->state LOAD event_indicated +To repeat, this write memory barrier is present if and only if something +is actually awakened. To see this, consider the following sequence of +events, where X and Y are both initially zero: + + CPU 1 CPU 2 + =============================== =============================== + X = 1; STORE event_indicated + smp_mb(); wake_up(); + Y = 1; wait_event(wq, Y == 1); + wake_up(); load from Y sees 1, no memory barrier + load from X might see 0 + +In contrast, if a wakeup does occur, CPU 2's load from X would be guaranteed +to see 1. + The available waker functions include: complete(); |