diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/video4linux/Zoran')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/video4linux/Zoran | 108 |
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 54 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/Zoran b/Documentation/video4linux/Zoran index 52c94bd7dca..be9f21b8455 100644 --- a/Documentation/video4linux/Zoran +++ b/Documentation/video4linux/Zoran @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Iomega Buz: * Philips saa7111 TV decoder * Philips saa7185 TV encoder Drivers to use: videodev, i2c-core, i2c-algo-bit, - videocodec, saa7111, saa7185, zr36060, zr36067 + videocodec, saa7111, saa7185, zr36060, zr36067 Inputs/outputs: Composite and S-video Norms: PAL, SECAM (720x576 @ 25 fps), NTSC (720x480 @ 29.97 fps) Card number: 7 @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Linux Media Labs LML33: * Brooktree bt819 TV decoder * Brooktree bt856 TV encoder Drivers to use: videodev, i2c-core, i2c-algo-bit, - videocodec, bt819, bt856, zr36060, zr36067 + videocodec, bt819, bt856, zr36060, zr36067 Inputs/outputs: Composite and S-video Norms: PAL (720x576 @ 25 fps), NTSC (720x480 @ 29.97 fps) Card number: 5 @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Linux Media Labs LML33R10: * Philips saa7114 TV decoder * Analog Devices adv7170 TV encoder Drivers to use: videodev, i2c-core, i2c-algo-bit, - videocodec, saa7114, adv7170, zr36060, zr36067 + videocodec, saa7114, adv7170, zr36060, zr36067 Inputs/outputs: Composite and S-video Norms: PAL (720x576 @ 25 fps), NTSC (720x480 @ 29.97 fps) Card number: 6 @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Pinnacle/Miro DC10(new): * Philips saa7110a TV decoder * Analog Devices adv7176 TV encoder Drivers to use: videodev, i2c-core, i2c-algo-bit, - videocodec, saa7110, adv7175, zr36060, zr36067 + videocodec, saa7110, adv7175, zr36060, zr36067 Inputs/outputs: Composite, S-video and Internal Norms: PAL, SECAM (768x576 @ 25 fps), NTSC (640x480 @ 29.97 fps) Card number: 1 @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Pinnacle/Miro DC10(old): * * Micronas vpx3220a TV decoder * mse3000 TV encoder or Analog Devices adv7176 TV encoder * Drivers to use: videodev, i2c-core, i2c-algo-bit, - videocodec, vpx3220, mse3000/adv7175, zr36050, zr36016, zr36067 + videocodec, vpx3220, mse3000/adv7175, zr36050, zr36016, zr36067 Inputs/outputs: Composite, S-video and Internal Norms: PAL, SECAM (768x576 @ 25 fps), NTSC (640x480 @ 29.97 fps) Card number: 0 @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Pinnacle/Miro DC30: * * Micronas vpx3225d/vpx3220a/vpx3216b TV decoder * Analog Devices adv7176 TV encoder Drivers to use: videodev, i2c-core, i2c-algo-bit, - videocodec, vpx3220/vpx3224, adv7175, zr36050, zr36016, zr36067 + videocodec, vpx3220/vpx3224, adv7175, zr36050, zr36016, zr36067 Inputs/outputs: Composite, S-video and Internal Norms: PAL, SECAM (768x576 @ 25 fps), NTSC (640x480 @ 29.97 fps) Card number: 3 @@ -123,11 +123,11 @@ Note: use encoder=X or decoder=X for non-default i2c chips (see i2c-id.h) The best know TV standards are NTSC/PAL/SECAM. but for decoding a frame that information is not enough. There are several formats of the TV standards. -And not every TV decoder is able to handle every format. Also the every -combination is supported by the driver. There are currently 11 different -tv broadcast formats all aver the world. +And not every TV decoder is able to handle every format. Also the every +combination is supported by the driver. There are currently 11 different +tv broadcast formats all aver the world. -The CCIR defines parameters needed for broadcasting the signal. +The CCIR defines parameters needed for broadcasting the signal. The CCIR has defined different standards: A,B,D,E,F,G,D,H,I,K,K1,L,M,N,... The CCIR says not much about about the colorsystem used !!! And talking about a colorsystem says not to much about how it is broadcast. @@ -136,18 +136,18 @@ The CCIR standards A,E,F are not used any more. When you speak about NTSC, you usually mean the standard: CCIR - M using the NTSC colorsystem which is used in the USA, Japan, Mexico, Canada -and a few others. +and a few others. When you talk about PAL, you usually mean: CCIR - B/G using the PAL -colorsystem which is used in many Countries. +colorsystem which is used in many Countries. -When you talk about SECAM, you mean: CCIR - L using the SECAM Colorsystem +When you talk about SECAM, you mean: CCIR - L using the SECAM Colorsystem which is used in France, and a few others. There the other version of SECAM, CCIR - D/K is used in Bulgaria, China, -Slovakai, Hungary, Korea (Rep.), Poland, Rumania and a others. +Slovakai, Hungary, Korea (Rep.), Poland, Rumania and a others. -The CCIR - H uses the PAL colorsystem (sometimes SECAM) and is used in +The CCIR - H uses the PAL colorsystem (sometimes SECAM) and is used in Egypt, Libya, Sri Lanka, Syrain Arab. Rep. The CCIR - I uses the PAL colorsystem, and is used in Great Britain, Hong Kong, @@ -158,30 +158,30 @@ and is used in Argentinia, Uruguay, an a few others We do not talk about how the audio is broadcast ! -A rather good sites about the TV standards are: +A rather good sites about the TV standards are: http://www.sony.jp/ServiceArea/Voltage_map/ http://info.electronicwerkstatt.de/bereiche/fernsehtechnik/frequenzen_und_normen/Fernsehnormen/ and http://www.cabl.com/restaurant/channel.html Other weird things around: NTSC 4.43 is a modificated NTSC, which is mainly used in PAL VCR's that are able to play back NTSC. PAL 60 seems to be the same -as NTSC 4.43 . The Datasheets also talk about NTSC 44, It seems as if it would -be the same as NTSC 4.43. +as NTSC 4.43 . The Datasheets also talk about NTSC 44, It seems as if it would +be the same as NTSC 4.43. NTSC Combs seems to be a decoder mode where the decoder uses a comb filter to split coma and luma instead of a Delay line. But I did not defiantly find out what NTSC Comb is. Philips saa7111 TV decoder -was introduced in 1997, is used in the BUZ and -can handle: PAL B/G/H/I, PAL N, PAL M, NTSC M, NTSC N, NTSC 4.43 and SECAM +was introduced in 1997, is used in the BUZ and +can handle: PAL B/G/H/I, PAL N, PAL M, NTSC M, NTSC N, NTSC 4.43 and SECAM Philips saa7110a TV decoder was introduced in 1995, is used in the Pinnacle/Miro DC10(new), DC10+ and -can handle: PAL B/G, NTSC M and SECAM +can handle: PAL B/G, NTSC M and SECAM Philips saa7114 TV decoder -was introduced in 2000, is used in the LML33R10 and +was introduced in 2000, is used in the LML33R10 and can handle: PAL B/G/D/H/I/N, PAL N, PAL M, NTSC M, NTSC 4.43 and SECAM Brooktree bt819 TV decoder @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ was introduced in 1996, is used in the BUZ can generate: PAL B/G, NTSC M Brooktree bt856 TV Encoder -was introduced in 1994, is used in the LML33 +was introduced in 1994, is used in the LML33 can generate: PAL B/D/G/H/I/N, PAL M, NTSC M, PAL-N (Argentina) Analog Devices adv7170 TV Encoder @@ -221,9 +221,9 @@ ITT mse3000 TV encoder was introduced in 1991, is used in the DC10 old can generate: PAL , NTSC , SECAM -The adv717x, should be able to produce PAL N. But you find nothing PAL N +The adv717x, should be able to produce PAL N. But you find nothing PAL N specific in the registers. Seem that you have to reuse a other standard -to generate PAL N, maybe it would work if you use the PAL M settings. +to generate PAL N, maybe it would work if you use the PAL M settings. ========================== @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ Here's my experience of using LML33 and Buz on various motherboards: VIA MVP3 Forget it. Pointless. Doesn't work. -Intel 430FX (Pentium 200) +Intel 430FX (Pentium 200) LML33 perfect, Buz tolerable (3 or 4 frames dropped per movie) Intel 440BX (early stepping) LML33 tolerable. Buz starting to get annoying (6-10 frames/hour) @@ -438,52 +438,52 @@ importance of buffer sizes: > -q 25 -b 128 : 24.655.992 > -q 25 -b 256 : 25.859.820 -I woke up, and can't go to sleep again. I'll kill some time explaining why +I woke up, and can't go to sleep again. I'll kill some time explaining why this doesn't look strange to me. -Let's do some math using a width of 704 pixels. I'm not sure whether the Buz +Let's do some math using a width of 704 pixels. I'm not sure whether the Buz actually use that number or not, but that's not too important right now. -704x288 pixels, one field, is 202752 pixels. Divided by 64 pixels per block; -3168 blocks per field. Each pixel consist of two bytes; 128 bytes per block; -1024 bits per block. 100% in the new driver mean 1:2 compression; the maximum -output becomes 512 bits per block. Actually 510, but 512 is simpler to use +704x288 pixels, one field, is 202752 pixels. Divided by 64 pixels per block; +3168 blocks per field. Each pixel consist of two bytes; 128 bytes per block; +1024 bits per block. 100% in the new driver mean 1:2 compression; the maximum +output becomes 512 bits per block. Actually 510, but 512 is simpler to use for calculations. -Let's say that we specify d1q50. We thus want 256 bits per block; times 3168 -becomes 811008 bits; 101376 bytes per field. We're talking raw bits and bytes -here, so we don't need to do any fancy corrections for bits-per-pixel or such +Let's say that we specify d1q50. We thus want 256 bits per block; times 3168 +becomes 811008 bits; 101376 bytes per field. We're talking raw bits and bytes +here, so we don't need to do any fancy corrections for bits-per-pixel or such things. 101376 bytes per field. -d1 video contains two fields per frame. Those sum up to 202752 bytes per +d1 video contains two fields per frame. Those sum up to 202752 bytes per frame, and one of those frames goes into each buffer. -But wait a second! -b128 gives 128kB buffers! It's not possible to cram +But wait a second! -b128 gives 128kB buffers! It's not possible to cram 202752 bytes of JPEG data into 128kB! -This is what the driver notice and automatically compensate for in your +This is what the driver notice and automatically compensate for in your examples. Let's do some math using this information: -128kB is 131072 bytes. In this buffer, we want to store two fields, which -leaves 65536 bytes for each field. Using 3168 blocks per field, we get -20.68686868... available bytes per block; 165 bits. We can't allow the -request for 256 bits per block when there's only 165 bits available! The -q50 -option is silently overridden, and the -b128 option takes precedence, leaving +128kB is 131072 bytes. In this buffer, we want to store two fields, which +leaves 65536 bytes for each field. Using 3168 blocks per field, we get +20.68686868... available bytes per block; 165 bits. We can't allow the +request for 256 bits per block when there's only 165 bits available! The -q50 +option is silently overridden, and the -b128 option takes precedence, leaving us with the equivalence of -q32. -This gives us a data rate of 165 bits per block, which, times 3168, sums up -to 65340 bytes per field, out of the allowed 65536. The current driver has -another level of rate limiting; it won't accept -q values that fill more than -6/8 of the specified buffers. (I'm not sure why. "Playing it safe" seem to be -a safe bet. Personally, I think I would have lowered requested-bits-per-block -by one, or something like that.) We can't use 165 bits per block, but have to -lower it again, to 6/8 of the available buffer space: We end up with 124 bits -per block, the equivalence of -q24. With 128kB buffers, you can't use greater +This gives us a data rate of 165 bits per block, which, times 3168, sums up +to 65340 bytes per field, out of the allowed 65536. The current driver has +another level of rate limiting; it won't accept -q values that fill more than +6/8 of the specified buffers. (I'm not sure why. "Playing it safe" seem to be +a safe bet. Personally, I think I would have lowered requested-bits-per-block +by one, or something like that.) We can't use 165 bits per block, but have to +lower it again, to 6/8 of the available buffer space: We end up with 124 bits +per block, the equivalence of -q24. With 128kB buffers, you can't use greater than -q24 at -d1. (And PAL, and 704 pixels width...) -The third example is limited to -q24 through the same process. The second -example, using very similar calculations, is limited to -q48. The only -example that actually grab at the specified -q value is the last one, which +The third example is limited to -q24 through the same process. The second +example, using very similar calculations, is limited to -q48. The only +example that actually grab at the specified -q value is the last one, which is clearly visible, looking at the file size. -- |