diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 43 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/networking/spider_net.txt | 204 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/sched-design-CFS.txt | 119 |
3 files changed, 323 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt index af50f9bbe68..4d880b3d1f3 100644 --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -1014,49 +1014,6 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file mga= [HW,DRM] - migration_cost= - [KNL,SMP] debug: override scheduler migration costs - Format: <level-1-usecs>,<level-2-usecs>,... - This debugging option can be used to override the - default scheduler migration cost matrix. The numbers - are indexed by 'CPU domain distance'. - E.g. migration_cost=1000,2000,3000 on an SMT NUMA - box will set up an intra-core migration cost of - 1 msec, an inter-core migration cost of 2 msecs, - and an inter-node migration cost of 3 msecs. - - WARNING: using the wrong values here can break - scheduler performance, so it's only for scheduler - development purposes, not production environments. - - migration_debug= - [KNL,SMP] migration cost auto-detect verbosity - Format=<0|1|2> - If a system's migration matrix reported at bootup - seems erroneous then this option can be used to - increase verbosity of the detection process. - We default to 0 (no extra messages), 1 will print - some more information, and 2 will be really - verbose (probably only useful if you also have a - serial console attached to the system). - - migration_factor= - [KNL,SMP] multiply/divide migration costs by a factor - Format=<percent> - This debug option can be used to proportionally - increase or decrease the auto-detected migration - costs for all entries of the migration matrix. - E.g. migration_factor=150 will increase migration - costs by 50%. (and thus the scheduler will be less - eager migrating cache-hot tasks) - migration_factor=80 will decrease migration costs - by 20%. (thus the scheduler will be more eager to - migrate tasks) - - WARNING: using the wrong values here can break - scheduler performance, so it's only for scheduler - development purposes, not production environments. - mousedev.tap_time= [MOUSE] Maximum time between finger touching and leaving touchpad surface for touch to be considered diff --git a/Documentation/networking/spider_net.txt b/Documentation/networking/spider_net.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4b4adb8eb14 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/networking/spider_net.txt @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ + + The Spidernet Device Driver + =========================== + +Written by Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com> + +Version of 7 June 2007 + +Abstract +======== +This document sketches the structure of portions of the spidernet +device driver in the Linux kernel tree. The spidernet is a gigabit +ethernet device built into the Toshiba southbridge commonly used +in the SONY Playstation 3 and the IBM QS20 Cell blade. + +The Structure of the RX Ring. +============================= +The receive (RX) ring is a circular linked list of RX descriptors, +together with three pointers into the ring that are used to manage its +contents. + +The elements of the ring are called "descriptors" or "descrs"; they +describe the received data. This includes a pointer to a buffer +containing the received data, the buffer size, and various status bits. + +There are three primary states that a descriptor can be in: "empty", +"full" and "not-in-use". An "empty" or "ready" descriptor is ready +to receive data from the hardware. A "full" descriptor has data in it, +and is waiting to be emptied and processed by the OS. A "not-in-use" +descriptor is neither empty or full; it is simply not ready. It may +not even have a data buffer in it, or is otherwise unusable. + +During normal operation, on device startup, the OS (specifically, the +spidernet device driver) allocates a set of RX descriptors and RX +buffers. These are all marked "empty", ready to receive data. This +ring is handed off to the hardware, which sequentially fills in the +buffers, and marks them "full". The OS follows up, taking the full +buffers, processing them, and re-marking them empty. + +This filling and emptying is managed by three pointers, the "head" +and "tail" pointers, managed by the OS, and a hardware current +descriptor pointer (GDACTDPA). The GDACTDPA points at the descr +currently being filled. When this descr is filled, the hardware +marks it full, and advances the GDACTDPA by one. Thus, when there is +flowing RX traffic, every descr behind it should be marked "full", +and everything in front of it should be "empty". If the hardware +discovers that the current descr is not empty, it will signal an +interrupt, and halt processing. + +The tail pointer tails or trails the hardware pointer. When the +hardware is ahead, the tail pointer will be pointing at a "full" +descr. The OS will process this descr, and then mark it "not-in-use", +and advance the tail pointer. Thus, when there is flowing RX traffic, +all of the descrs in front of the tail pointer should be "full", and +all of those behind it should be "not-in-use". When RX traffic is not +flowing, then the tail pointer can catch up to the hardware pointer. +The OS will then note that the current tail is "empty", and halt +processing. + +The head pointer (somewhat mis-named) follows after the tail pointer. +When traffic is flowing, then the head pointer will be pointing at +a "not-in-use" descr. The OS will perform various housekeeping duties +on this descr. This includes allocating a new data buffer and +dma-mapping it so as to make it visible to the hardware. The OS will +then mark the descr as "empty", ready to receive data. Thus, when there +is flowing RX traffic, everything in front of the head pointer should +be "not-in-use", and everything behind it should be "empty". If no +RX traffic is flowing, then the head pointer can catch up to the tail +pointer, at which point the OS will notice that the head descr is +"empty", and it will halt processing. + +Thus, in an idle system, the GDACTDPA, tail and head pointers will +all be pointing at the same descr, which should be "empty". All of the +other descrs in the ring should be "empty" as well. + +The show_rx_chain() routine will print out the the locations of the +GDACTDPA, tail and head pointers. It will also summarize the contents +of the ring, starting at the tail pointer, and listing the status +of the descrs that follow. + +A typical example of the output, for a nearly idle system, might be + +net eth1: Total number of descrs=256 +net eth1: Chain tail located at descr=20 +net eth1: Chain head is at 20 +net eth1: HW curr desc (GDACTDPA) is at 21 +net eth1: Have 1 descrs with stat=x40800101 +net eth1: HW next desc (GDACNEXTDA) is at 22 +net eth1: Last 255 descrs with stat=xa0800000 + +In the above, the hardware has filled in one descr, number 20. Both +head and tail are pointing at 20, because it has not yet been emptied. +Meanwhile, hw is pointing at 21, which is free. + +The "Have nnn decrs" refers to the descr starting at the tail: in this +case, nnn=1 descr, starting at descr 20. The "Last nnn descrs" refers +to all of the rest of the descrs, from the last status change. The "nnn" +is a count of how many descrs have exactly the same status. + +The status x4... corresponds to "full" and status xa... corresponds +to "empty". The actual value printed is RXCOMST_A. + +In the device driver source code, a different set of names are +used for these same concepts, so that + +"empty" == SPIDER_NET_DESCR_CARDOWNED == 0xa +"full" == SPIDER_NET_DESCR_FRAME_END == 0x4 +"not in use" == SPIDER_NET_DESCR_NOT_IN_USE == 0xf + + +The RX RAM full bug/feature +=========================== + +As long as the OS can empty out the RX buffers at a rate faster than +the hardware can fill them, there is no problem. If, for some reason, +the OS fails to empty the RX ring fast enough, the hardware GDACTDPA +pointer will catch up to the head, notice the not-empty condition, +ad stop. However, RX packets may still continue arriving on the wire. +The spidernet chip can save some limited number of these in local RAM. +When this local ram fills up, the spider chip will issue an interrupt +indicating this (GHIINT0STS will show ERRINT, and the GRMFLLINT bit +will be set in GHIINT1STS). When the RX ram full condition occurs, +a certain bug/feature is triggered that has to be specially handled. +This section describes the special handling for this condition. + +When the OS finally has a chance to run, it will empty out the RX ring. +In particular, it will clear the descriptor on which the hardware had +stopped. However, once the hardware has decided that a certain +descriptor is invalid, it will not restart at that descriptor; instead +it will restart at the next descr. This potentially will lead to a +deadlock condition, as the tail pointer will be pointing at this descr, +which, from the OS point of view, is empty; the OS will be waiting for +this descr to be filled. However, the hardware has skipped this descr, +and is filling the next descrs. Since the OS doesn't see this, there +is a potential deadlock, with the OS waiting for one descr to fill, +while the hardware is waiting for a different set of descrs to become +empty. + +A call to show_rx_chain() at this point indicates the nature of the +problem. A typical print when the network is hung shows the following: + +net eth1: Spider RX RAM full, incoming packets might be discarded! +net eth1: Total number of descrs=256 +net eth1: Chain tail located at descr=255 +net eth1: Chain head is at 255 +net eth1: HW curr desc (GDACTDPA) is at 0 +net eth1: Have 1 descrs with stat=xa0800000 +net eth1: HW next desc (GDACNEXTDA) is at 1 +net eth1: Have 127 descrs with stat=x40800101 +net eth1: Have 1 descrs with stat=x40800001 +net eth1: Have 126 descrs with stat=x40800101 +net eth1: Last 1 descrs with stat=xa0800000 + +Both the tail and head pointers are pointing at descr 255, which is +marked xa... which is "empty". Thus, from the OS point of view, there +is nothing to be done. In particular, there is the implicit assumption +that everything in front of the "empty" descr must surely also be empty, +as explained in the last section. The OS is waiting for descr 255 to +become non-empty, which, in this case, will never happen. + +The HW pointer is at descr 0. This descr is marked 0x4.. or "full". +Since its already full, the hardware can do nothing more, and thus has +halted processing. Notice that descrs 0 through 254 are all marked +"full", while descr 254 and 255 are empty. (The "Last 1 descrs" is +descr 254, since tail was at 255.) Thus, the system is deadlocked, +and there can be no forward progress; the OS thinks there's nothing +to do, and the hardware has nowhere to put incoming data. + +This bug/feature is worked around with the spider_net_resync_head_ptr() +routine. When the driver receives RX interrupts, but an examination +of the RX chain seems to show it is empty, then it is probable that +the hardware has skipped a descr or two (sometimes dozens under heavy +network conditions). The spider_net_resync_head_ptr() subroutine will +search the ring for the next full descr, and the driver will resume +operations there. Since this will leave "holes" in the ring, there +is also a spider_net_resync_tail_ptr() that will skip over such holes. + +As of this writing, the spider_net_resync() strategy seems to work very +well, even under heavy network loads. + + +The TX ring +=========== +The TX ring uses a low-watermark interrupt scheme to make sure that +the TX queue is appropriately serviced for large packet sizes. + +For packet sizes greater than about 1KBytes, the kernel can fill +the TX ring quicker than the device can drain it. Once the ring +is full, the netdev is stopped. When there is room in the ring, +the netdev needs to be reawakened, so that more TX packets are placed +in the ring. The hardware can empty the ring about four times per jiffy, +so its not appropriate to wait for the poll routine to refill, since +the poll routine runs only once per jiffy. The low-watermark mechanism +marks a descr about 1/4th of the way from the bottom of the queue, so +that an interrupt is generated when the descr is processed. This +interrupt wakes up the netdev, which can then refill the queue. +For large packets, this mechanism generates a relatively small number +of interrupts, about 1K/sec. For smaller packets, this will drop to zero +interrupts, as the hardware can empty the queue faster than the kernel +can fill it. + + + ======= END OF DOCUMENT ======== + diff --git a/Documentation/sched-design-CFS.txt b/Documentation/sched-design-CFS.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..16feebb7bdc --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/sched-design-CFS.txt @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ + +This is the CFS scheduler. + +80% of CFS's design can be summed up in a single sentence: CFS basically +models an "ideal, precise multi-tasking CPU" on real hardware. + +"Ideal multi-tasking CPU" is a (non-existent :-)) CPU that has 100% +physical power and which can run each task at precise equal speed, in +parallel, each at 1/nr_running speed. For example: if there are 2 tasks +running then it runs each at 50% physical power - totally in parallel. + +On real hardware, we can run only a single task at once, so while that +one task runs, the other tasks that are waiting for the CPU are at a +disadvantage - the current task gets an unfair amount of CPU time. In +CFS this fairness imbalance is expressed and tracked via the per-task +p->wait_runtime (nanosec-unit) value. "wait_runtime" is the amount of +time the task should now run on the CPU for it to become completely fair +and balanced. + +( small detail: on 'ideal' hardware, the p->wait_runtime value would + always be zero - no task would ever get 'out of balance' from the + 'ideal' share of CPU time. ) + +CFS's task picking logic is based on this p->wait_runtime value and it +is thus very simple: it always tries to run the task with the largest +p->wait_runtime value. In other words, CFS tries to run the task with +the 'gravest need' for more CPU time. So CFS always tries to split up +CPU time between runnable tasks as close to 'ideal multitasking +hardware' as possible. + +Most of the rest of CFS's design just falls out of this really simple +concept, with a few add-on embellishments like nice levels, +multiprocessing and various algorithm variants to recognize sleepers. + +In practice it works like this: the system runs a task a bit, and when +the task schedules (or a scheduler tick happens) the task's CPU usage is +'accounted for': the (small) time it just spent using the physical CPU +is deducted from p->wait_runtime. [minus the 'fair share' it would have +gotten anyway]. Once p->wait_runtime gets low enough so that another +task becomes the 'leftmost task' of the time-ordered rbtree it maintains +(plus a small amount of 'granularity' distance relative to the leftmost +task so that we do not over-schedule tasks and trash the cache) then the +new leftmost task is picked and the current task is preempted. + +The rq->fair_clock value tracks the 'CPU time a runnable task would have +fairly gotten, had it been runnable during that time'. So by using +rq->fair_clock values we can accurately timestamp and measure the +'expected CPU time' a task should have gotten. All runnable tasks are +sorted in the rbtree by the "rq->fair_clock - p->wait_runtime" key, and +CFS picks the 'leftmost' task and sticks to it. As the system progresses +forwards, newly woken tasks are put into the tree more and more to the +right - slowly but surely giving a chance for every task to become the +'leftmost task' and thus get on the CPU within a deterministic amount of +time. + +Some implementation details: + + - the introduction of Scheduling Classes: an extensible hierarchy of + scheduler modules. These modules encapsulate scheduling policy + details and are handled by the scheduler core without the core + code assuming about them too much. + + - sched_fair.c implements the 'CFS desktop scheduler': it is a + replacement for the vanilla scheduler's SCHED_OTHER interactivity + code. + + I'd like to give credit to Con Kolivas for the general approach here: + he has proven via RSDL/SD that 'fair scheduling' is possible and that + it results in better desktop scheduling. Kudos Con! + + The CFS patch uses a completely different approach and implementation + from RSDL/SD. My goal was to make CFS's interactivity quality exceed + that of RSDL/SD, which is a high standard to meet :-) Testing + feedback is welcome to decide this one way or another. [ and, in any + case, all of SD's logic could be added via a kernel/sched_sd.c module + as well, if Con is interested in such an approach. ] + + CFS's design is quite radical: it does not use runqueues, it uses a + time-ordered rbtree to build a 'timeline' of future task execution, + and thus has no 'array switch' artifacts (by which both the vanilla + scheduler and RSDL/SD are affected). + + CFS uses nanosecond granularity accounting and does not rely on any + jiffies or other HZ detail. Thus the CFS scheduler has no notion of + 'timeslices' and has no heuristics whatsoever. There is only one + central tunable: + + /proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity_ns + + which can be used to tune the scheduler from 'desktop' (low + latencies) to 'server' (good batching) workloads. It defaults to a + setting suitable for desktop workloads. SCHED_BATCH is handled by the + CFS scheduler module too. + + Due to its design, the CFS scheduler is not prone to any of the + 'attacks' that exist today against the heuristics of the stock + scheduler: fiftyp.c, thud.c, chew.c, ring-test.c, massive_intr.c all + work fine and do not impact interactivity and produce the expected + behavior. + + the CFS scheduler has a much stronger handling of nice levels and + SCHED_BATCH: both types of workloads should be isolated much more + agressively than under the vanilla scheduler. + + ( another detail: due to nanosec accounting and timeline sorting, + sched_yield() support is very simple under CFS, and in fact under + CFS sched_yield() behaves much better than under any other + scheduler i have tested so far. ) + + - sched_rt.c implements SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR semantics, in a simpler + way than the vanilla scheduler does. It uses 100 runqueues (for all + 100 RT priority levels, instead of 140 in the vanilla scheduler) + and it needs no expired array. + + - reworked/sanitized SMP load-balancing: the runqueue-walking + assumptions are gone from the load-balancing code now, and + iterators of the scheduling modules are used. The balancing code got + quite a bit simpler as a result. + |