diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ethernet/sis')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis190.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c | 9 |
2 files changed, 4 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis190.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis190.c index 5b118cd5bf9..a9deda8eaf6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis190.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis190.c @@ -1462,8 +1462,6 @@ static struct net_device * __devinit sis190_init_board(struct pci_dev *pdev) dev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(*tp)); if (!dev) { - if (netif_msg_drv(&debug)) - pr_err("unable to alloc new ethernet\n"); rc = -ENOMEM; goto err_out_0; } diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c index c8efc708c79..5ccf02e7e3a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int __devinit sis900_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, ret = sis900_get_mac_addr(pci_dev, net_dev); if (!ret || !is_valid_ether_addr(net_dev->dev_addr)) { - random_ether_addr(net_dev->dev_addr); + eth_hw_addr_random(net_dev); printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Unreadable or invalid MAC address," "using random generated one\n", dev_name); } @@ -619,7 +619,6 @@ static int __devinit sis900_mii_probe(struct net_device * net_dev) } if ((mii_phy = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mii_phy), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "Cannot allocate mem for struct mii_phy\n"); mii_phy = sis_priv->first_mii; while (mii_phy) { struct mii_phy *phy; @@ -1167,7 +1166,7 @@ sis900_init_rx_ring(struct net_device *net_dev) for (i = 0; i < NUM_RX_DESC; i++) { struct sk_buff *skb; - if ((skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { + if ((skb = netdev_alloc_skb(net_dev, RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { /* not enough memory for skbuff, this makes a "hole" on the buffer ring, it is not clear how the hardware will react to this kind of degenerated @@ -1770,7 +1769,7 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev) /* refill the Rx buffer, what if there is not enough * memory for new socket buffer ?? */ - if ((skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { + if ((skb = netdev_alloc_skb(net_dev, RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { /* * Not enough memory to refill the buffer * so we need to recycle the old one so @@ -1828,7 +1827,7 @@ refill_rx_ring: entry = sis_priv->dirty_rx % NUM_RX_DESC; if (sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry] == NULL) { - if ((skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { + if ((skb = netdev_alloc_skb(net_dev, RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { /* not enough memory for skbuff, this makes a * "hole" on the buffer ring, it is not clear * how the hardware will react to this kind |