diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/srcu.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/srcu.c | 149 |
1 files changed, 69 insertions, 80 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/srcu.c b/kernel/srcu.c index 1fecb4d858e..e0139a27485 100644 --- a/kernel/srcu.c +++ b/kernel/srcu.c @@ -73,10 +73,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_srcu_struct); #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */ /* + * Returns approximate total of the readers' ->seq[] values for the + * rank of per-CPU counters specified by idx. + */ +static unsigned long srcu_readers_seq_idx(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx) +{ + int cpu; + unsigned long sum = 0; + unsigned long t; + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + t = ACCESS_ONCE(per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, cpu)->seq[idx]); + sum += t; + } + return sum; +} + +/* * Returns approximate number of readers active on the specified rank - * of per-CPU counters. Also snapshots each counter's value in the - * corresponding element of sp->snap[] for later use validating - * the sum. + * of the per-CPU ->c[] counters. */ static unsigned long srcu_readers_active_idx(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx) { @@ -87,26 +102,45 @@ static unsigned long srcu_readers_active_idx(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx) for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { t = ACCESS_ONCE(per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, cpu)->c[idx]); sum += t; - sp->snap[cpu] = t; } - return sum & SRCU_REF_MASK; + return sum; } /* - * To be called from the update side after an index flip. Returns true - * if the modulo sum of the counters is stably zero, false if there is - * some possibility of non-zero. + * Return true if the number of pre-existing readers is determined to + * be stably zero. An example unstable zero can occur if the call + * to srcu_readers_active_idx() misses an __srcu_read_lock() increment, + * but due to task migration, sees the corresponding __srcu_read_unlock() + * decrement. This can happen because srcu_readers_active_idx() takes + * time to sum the array, and might in fact be interrupted or preempted + * partway through the summation. */ static bool srcu_readers_active_idx_check(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx) { - int cpu; + unsigned long seq; + + seq = srcu_readers_seq_idx(sp, idx); + + /* + * The following smp_mb() A pairs with the smp_mb() B located in + * __srcu_read_lock(). This pairing ensures that if an + * __srcu_read_lock() increments its counter after the summation + * in srcu_readers_active_idx(), then the corresponding SRCU read-side + * critical section will see any changes made prior to the start + * of the current SRCU grace period. + * + * Also, if the above call to srcu_readers_seq_idx() saw the + * increment of ->seq[], then the call to srcu_readers_active_idx() + * must see the increment of ->c[]. + */ + smp_mb(); /* A */ /* * Note that srcu_readers_active_idx() can incorrectly return * zero even though there is a pre-existing reader throughout. * To see this, suppose that task A is in a very long SRCU * read-side critical section that started on CPU 0, and that - * no other reader exists, so that the modulo sum of the counters + * no other reader exists, so that the sum of the counters * is equal to one. Then suppose that task B starts executing * srcu_readers_active_idx(), summing up to CPU 1, and then that * task C starts reading on CPU 0, so that its increment is not @@ -122,53 +156,31 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active_idx_check(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx) return false; /* - * Since the caller recently flipped ->completed, we can see at - * most one increment of each CPU's counter from this point - * forward. The reason for this is that the reader CPU must have - * fetched the index before srcu_readers_active_idx checked - * that CPU's counter, but not yet incremented its counter. - * Its eventual counter increment will follow the read in - * srcu_readers_active_idx(), and that increment is immediately - * followed by smp_mb() B. Because smp_mb() D is between - * the ->completed flip and srcu_readers_active_idx()'s read, - * that CPU's subsequent load of ->completed must see the new - * value, and therefore increment the counter in the other rank. - */ - smp_mb(); /* A */ - - /* - * Now, we check the ->snap array that srcu_readers_active_idx() - * filled in from the per-CPU counter values. Since - * __srcu_read_lock() increments the upper bits of the per-CPU - * counter, an increment/decrement pair will change the value - * of the counter. Since there is only one possible increment, - * the only way to wrap the counter is to have a huge number of - * counter decrements, which requires a huge number of tasks and - * huge SRCU read-side critical-section nesting levels, even on - * 32-bit systems. + * The remainder of this function is the validation step. + * The following smp_mb() D pairs with the smp_mb() C in + * __srcu_read_unlock(). If the __srcu_read_unlock() was seen + * by srcu_readers_active_idx() above, then any destructive + * operation performed after the grace period will happen after + * the corresponding SRCU read-side critical section. * - * All of the ways of confusing the readings require that the scan - * in srcu_readers_active_idx() see the read-side task's decrement, - * but not its increment. However, between that decrement and - * increment are smb_mb() B and C. Either or both of these pair - * with smp_mb() A above to ensure that the scan below will see - * the read-side tasks's increment, thus noting a difference in - * the counter values between the two passes. - * - * Therefore, if srcu_readers_active_idx() returned zero, and - * none of the counters changed, we know that the zero was the - * correct sum. - * - * Of course, it is possible that a task might be delayed - * for a very long time in __srcu_read_lock() after fetching - * the index but before incrementing its counter. This - * possibility will be dealt with in __synchronize_srcu(). + * Note that there can be at most NR_CPUS worth of readers using + * the old index, which is not enough to overflow even a 32-bit + * integer. (Yes, this does mean that systems having more than + * a billion or so CPUs need to be 64-bit systems.) Therefore, + * the sum of the ->seq[] counters cannot possibly overflow. + * Therefore, the only way that the return values of the two + * calls to srcu_readers_seq_idx() can be equal is if there were + * no increments of the corresponding rank of ->seq[] counts + * in the interim. But the missed-increment scenario laid out + * above includes an increment of the ->seq[] counter by + * the corresponding __srcu_read_lock(). Therefore, if this + * scenario occurs, the return values from the two calls to + * srcu_readers_seq_idx() will differ, and thus the validation + * step below suffices. */ - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) - if (sp->snap[cpu] != - ACCESS_ONCE(per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, cpu)->c[idx])) - return false; /* False zero reading! */ - return true; + smp_mb(); /* D */ + + return srcu_readers_seq_idx(sp, idx) == seq; } /** @@ -216,9 +228,9 @@ int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *sp) preempt_disable(); idx = rcu_dereference_index_check(sp->completed, rcu_read_lock_sched_held()) & 0x1; - ACCESS_ONCE(this_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref)->c[idx]) += - SRCU_USAGE_COUNT + 1; + ACCESS_ONCE(this_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref)->c[idx]) += 1; smp_mb(); /* B */ /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */ + ACCESS_ONCE(this_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref)->seq[idx]) += 1; preempt_enable(); return idx; } @@ -258,17 +270,6 @@ static void wait_idx(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx, bool expedited) int trycount = 0; /* - * If a reader fetches the index before the ->completed increment, - * but increments its counter after srcu_readers_active_idx_check() - * sums it, then smp_mb() D will pair with __srcu_read_lock()'s - * smp_mb() B to ensure that the SRCU read-side critical section - * will see any updates that the current task performed before its - * call to synchronize_srcu(), or to synchronize_srcu_expedited(), - * as the case may be. - */ - smp_mb(); /* D */ - - /* * SRCU read-side critical sections are normally short, so wait * a small amount of time before possibly blocking. */ @@ -281,18 +282,6 @@ static void wait_idx(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx, bool expedited) schedule_timeout_interruptible(1); } } - - /* - * The following smp_mb() E pairs with srcu_read_unlock()'s - * smp_mb C to ensure that if srcu_readers_active_idx_check() - * sees srcu_read_unlock()'s counter decrement, then any - * of the current task's subsequent code will happen after - * that SRCU read-side critical section. - * - * It also ensures the order between the above waiting and - * the next flipping. - */ - smp_mb(); /* E */ } static void srcu_flip(struct srcu_struct *sp) |