summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2007-07-01PM: introduce set_target method in pm_opsRafael J. Wysocki
Commit 52ade9b3b97fd3bea42842a056fe0786c28d0555 changed the suspend code ordering to execute pm_ops->prepare() after the device model per-device .suspend() calls in order to fix some ACPI-related issues. Unfortunately, it broke the at91 platform which assumed that pm_ops->prepare() would be called before suspending devices. at91 used pm_ops->prepare() to get notified of the target system sleep state, so that it could use this information while suspending devices. However, with the current suspend code ordering pm_ops->prepare() is called too late for this purpose. Thus, at91 needs an additional method in 'struct pm_ops' that will be used for notifying the platform of the target system sleep state. Moreover, in the future such a method will also be needed by ACPI. This patch adds the .set_target() method to 'struct pm_ops' and makes the suspend code call it, if implemented, before executing the device model per-device .suspend() calls. It also modifies the at91 code to use pm_ops->set_target() instead of pm_ops->prepare(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-06-02[ARM] 4419/1: AT91: SAM9 USB clocks check for suspendingAndrew Victor
When suspending to slow-clock mode, at91_pm_verify_clocks() is called to ensure that all the clocks are disabled or in the correct state. This patch replaces the "#warning TODO" messages for the SAM9 processors with the correct code. Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-04-30rework pm_ops pm_disk_mode, kill misuseJohannes Berg
This patch series cleans up some misconceptions about pm_ops. Some users of the pm_ops structure attempt to use it to stop the user from entering suspend to disk, this, however, is not possible since the user can always use "shutdown" in /sys/power/disk and then the pm_ops are never invoked. Also, platforms that don't support suspend to disk simply should not allow configuring SOFTWARE_SUSPEND (read the help text on it, it only selects suspend to disk and nothing else, all the other stuff depends on PM). The pm_ops structure is actually intended to provide a way to enter platform-defined sleep states (currently supported states are "standby" and "mem" (suspend to ram)) and additionally (if SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is configured) allows a platform to support a platform specific way to enter low-power mode once everything has been saved to disk. This is currently only used by ACPI (S4). This patch: The pm_ops.pm_disk_mode is used in totally bogus ways since nobody really seems to understand what it actually does. This patch clarifies the pm_disk_mode description. It also removes all the arm and sh users that think they can veto suspend to disk via pm_ops; not so since the user can always do echo shutdown > /sys/power/disk, they need to find a better way involving Kconfig or such. ACPI is the only user left with a non-zero pm_disk_mode. The patch also sets the default mode to shutdown again, but when a new pm_ops is registered its pm_disk_mode is selected as default, that way the default stays for ACPI where it is apparently required. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-08[ARM] 4145/2: AT91: Add support for AT91SAM9263 processorAndrew Victor
Add support for the Atmel AT91SAM9263 processor. It is similar to the AT91SAM9260 but with more integrated peripherals, 5 GPIO banks, etc. Original patch from Nicolas Ferre. Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-02-08[ARM] 4124/1: Rename mach-at91rm9200 and arch-at91rm9200 directoriesAndrew Victor
Now that Linux includes support for the Atmel AT91SAM9260 and AT91SAM9261 processors in addition to the original Atmel AT91RM9200 (with support for more AT91 processors pending), the "mach-at91rm9200" and "arch-at91rm9200" directories should be renamed to indicate their more generic nature. The following git commands should be run BEFORE applying this patch: git-mv arch/arm/mach-at91rm9200 arch/arm/mach-at91 git-mv include/asm-arm/arch-at91rm9200 include/asm-arm/arch-at91 Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>