| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Rather than having each platform class provide a mach/smp.h header for
smp_cross_call(), arrange for them to register the function with the
core ARM SMP code instead.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
With "ARM: CPU hotplug: remove bug checks in platform_cpu_die()", we
now do not use hard_smp_processor_id(), we no longer need to read the
hardware processor ID. Remove the include providing this function.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
This allows us to use smp_cross_call() to trigger a number of different
software generated interrupts, rather than combining them all on one
SGI. Recover the SGI number via do_IPI.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Provide a common header to read the SMP CPU number from the MPIDR.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
smp_cross_call_done() is a no-op for MPCore, and since it's only
used by platform code, there's no point in having it unless it's
doing something.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
The ARM SMP code wasn't properly updated for the cpumask changes, which
results in smp_timer_broadcast() broadcasting ticks to non-online CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
