summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/mach-ux500/platsmp.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2011-07-07ARM: 6993/1: platsmp: Allow secondary cpu hotplug with maxcpus=1Stephen Boyd
If an ARM system has multiple cpus in the same socket and the kernel is booted with maxcpus=1, secondary cpus are possible but not present due to how platform_smp_prepare_cpus() is called. Since most typical ARM processors don't actually support physical hotplug, initialize the present map to be equal to the possible map in generic ARM SMP code. Also, always call platform_smp_prepare_cpus() as long as max_cpus is non-zero (0 means no SMP) to allow platform code to do any SMP setup. After applying this patch it's possible to boot an ARM system with maxcpus=1 on the command line and then hotplug in secondary cpus via sysfs. This is more in line with how x86 does things. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2011-05-23ARM: 6895/1: mach-ux500: fix SMP secondary startup regressionLinus Walleij
Commit e2a083dc0da9aa6437e14811198379b18cdfa7f8 "ARM: consolidate SMP cross call implementation" broke the ux500 compilation since the smp.h header declared a function called from headsmp.S. This fixes it up by declaring it locally instead. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2011-05-23ARM: consolidate SMP cross call implementationRussell King
Rather than having each platform class provide a mach/smp.h header for smp_cross_call(), arrange for them to register the function with the core ARM SMP code instead. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2011-01-10ux500: remove build-time changing macrosRabin Vincent
To allow the possiblity of building U8500 and U5500 support in the same image. Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com> [Rebased to latest changes in Russells tree] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
2011-01-06Merge branch 'devel-stable' into develRussell King
Conflicts: arch/arm/mach-pxa/clock.c arch/arm/mach-pxa/clock.h
2011-01-06Merge branch 'misc' into develRussell King
Conflicts: arch/arm/Kconfig arch/arm/common/Makefile arch/arm/kernel/Makefile arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
2010-12-20ARM: Fix subtle race in CPU pen_release hotplug codeRussell King
There is a subtle race in the CPU hotplug code, where a CPU which has been offlined can online itself before being requested, which results in things going astray on the next online/offline cycle. What happens in the normal online/offline/online cycle is: CPU0 CPU3 requests boot of CPU3 pen_release = 3 flush cache line checks pen_release, reads 3 starts boot pen_release = -1 ... requests CPU3 offline ... ... dies ... checks pen_release, reads -1 requests boot of CPU3 pen_release = 3 flush cache line checks pen_release, reads 3 starts boot pen_release = -1 However, as the write of -1 of pen_release is not fully flushed back to memory, and the checking of pen_release is done with caches disabled, this allows CPU3 the opportunity to read the old value of pen_release: CPU0 CPU3 requests boot of CPU3 pen_release = 3 flush cache line checks pen_release, reads 3 starts boot pen_release = -1 ... requests CPU3 offline ... ... dies ... checks pen_release, reads 3 starts boot pen_release = -1 requests boot of CPU3 pen_release = 3 flush cache line Fix this by grouping the write of pen_release along with its cache line flushing code to ensure that any update to pen_release is always pushed out to physical memory. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-12-20ARM: SMP: consolidate trace_hardirqs_off() into common SMP codeRussell King
All platforms call trace_hardirqs_off() in their secondary startup code, so move this into the core SMP code - it doesn't need to be in the per-platform code. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-12-20ARM: SMP: consolidate the common parts of smp_prepare_cpus()Russell King
There is a certain amount of smp_prepare_cpus() which doesn't belong in the platform support code - that is, code which is invariant to the SMP implementation. Move this code into arch/arm/kernel/smp.c, and add a platform_ prefix to the original function. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-12-20ARM: SMP: get rid of get_core_count()Russell King
We don't need this small function as well as scu_get_core_count() Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-12-20ARM: SMP: Clean up ncores sanity checksRussell King
scu_get_core_count() never returns zero cores, so we don't need to check and correct if ncores is zero. Tegra was missing the check against NR_CPUS, leading to a potential bitfield overflow if this becomes the case. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-12-20ARM: SMP: move CPU number sanity checks to smp_init_cpus()Russell King
Ensure that the number of CPUs is sanity checked before setting the number of possible CPUs. This avoids any chance of overflowing the cpu_possible bitmap. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-12-19ux500: platsmp: Fix section mismatchJonas Aaberg
Signed-off-by: Jonas Aaberg <jonas.aberg@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
2010-12-14ARM: GIC: Remove MMIO address from gic_cpu_init, rename to gic_secondary_initRussell King
We don't need to re-pass the base address for the CPU interfaces to the GIC for secondary CPUs, as it will never be different from the boot CPU - and even if it was, we'd overwrite the boot CPU's base address. Get rid of this argument, and rename to gic_secondary_init(). Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Tested-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-12-03ARM: SMP: pass an ipi number to smp_cross_call()Russell King
This allows us to use smp_cross_call() to trigger a number of different software generated interrupts, rather than combining them all on one SGI. Recover the SGI number via do_IPI. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-09-19ARM: 6391/1: ux500: add CPU hotplug supportSundar Iyer
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Sundar Iyer <sundar.iyer@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-05-04ARM: 6088/1: ux500: use UX500_* macros instead of U8500_*Rabin Vincent
So that the correct addresses get used on U5500. Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com> Acked-by: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-04-14ARM: 6027/1: ux500: enable l2x0 supportSrinidhi Kasagar
This enables the l2x0 support and ensures that the secondary CPU can see the page table and secondary data at this point. Signed-off-by: srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-11-28ARM: 5831/1: ARM: U8500 core machine supportSrinidhi Kasagar
Adds core support for the ST-Ericsson U8500 platform. It supports memory mappings, binds to the existing modules like GIC, SCU, TWD and local timers and sets up the infrastructure for the secondary core. Reviewed-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@unipv.it> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> Acked-by: Andrea Gallo <andrea.gallo@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>