summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/powerpc/mm/lmb.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2007-03-08[POWERPC] Allow duplicate lmb_reserve() callsDavid Gibson
At present calling lmb_reserve() (and hence lmb_add_region()) twice for exactly the same memory region will cause strange behaviour. This makes life difficult when booting from a flat device tree with memory reserve map. Which regions are automatically reserved by the kernel has changed over time, so it's quite possible a newer kernel could attempt to auto-reserve a region which is also explicitly listed in the device tree's reserve map, leading to trouble. This patch avoids the problem by making lmb_reserve() ignore a call to reserve a previously reserved region. It also removes a now redundant test designed to avoid one specific case of the problem noted above. At present, this patch deals only with duplicate reservations of an identical region. Attempting to reserve two different, but overlapping regions will still cause problems. I might post another patch later dealing with this case, but I'm avoiding it now since it is substantially more complicated to deal with, less likely to occur and more likely to indicate a genuine bug elsewhere if it does occur. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-07-26[POWERPC] Fix mem= handling when the memory limit is > RMO sizeMichael Ellerman
There's a bug in my cleaned up mem= handling, if the memory limit is larger than the RMO size we'll erroneously enlarge the RMO size. Fix is to only change the RMO size if the memory limit is less than the current RMO value. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-06-30Remove obsolete #include <linux/config.h>Jörn Engel
Signed-off-by: Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
2006-05-19[PATCH] powerpc: Unify mem= handlingMichael Ellerman
We currently do mem= handling in three seperate places. And as benh pointed out I wrote two of them. Now that we parse command line parameters earlier we can clean this mess up. Moving the parsing out of prom_init means the device tree might be allocated above the memory limit. If that happens we'd have to move it. As it happens we already have logic to do that for kdump, so just genericise it. This also means we might have reserved regions above the memory limit, if we do the bootmem allocator will blow up, so we have to modify lmb_enforce_memory_limit() to truncate the reserves as well. Tested on P5 LPAR, iSeries, F50, 44p. Tested moving device tree on P5 and 44p and F50. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-03-17[PATCH] powerpc: Fix bug in bug fix for bug in lmb_alloc()Michael Ellerman
My patch (d7a5b2ffa1352f0310630934a56aecbdfb617b72) to always panic if lmb_alloc() fails is broken because it checks alloc < 0, but should be checking alloc == 0. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-02-07[PATCH] powerpc: Move LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE out of lmb.hMichael Ellerman
LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE doesn't need to be part of the API, it's only used in lmb.c - so move it out of the header file. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-02-07[PATCH] powerpc: Always panic if lmb_alloc() failsMichael Ellerman
Currently most callers of lmb_alloc() don't check if it worked or not, if it ever does weird bad things will probably happen. The few callers who do check just panic or BUG_ON. So make lmb_alloc() panic internally, to catch bugs at the source. The few callers who did check the result no longer need to. The only caller that did anything interesting with the return result was careful_allocation(). For it we create __lmb_alloc_base() which _doesn't_ panic automatically, a little messy, but passable. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-02-07[PATCH] powerpc: Make sure we don't create empty lmb regionsMichael Ellerman
To prevent problems later in boot, make sure we don't create zero-size lmb regions. I've checked all the callers, and at the moment no one should ever hit this. All callers use a constant size, or they check the computed size before they call us. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-11-16[PATCH] powerpc: Fixup debugging in lmb.cMichael Ellerman
Somewhere we lost the include of udbg.h in lmb.c. While we're there, add a DBG macro like every other file has and use it in lmb_dump_all(). Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-10-06powerpc: Merge lmb.c and make MM initialization use it.Paul Mackerras
This also creates merged versions of do_init_bootmem, paging_init and mem_init and moves them to arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c. It gets rid of the mem_pieces stuff. I made memory_limit a parameter to lmb_enforce_memory_limit rather than a global referenced by that function. This will require some small changes to ppc64 if we want to continue building ARCH=ppc64 using the merged lmb.c. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>