| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Currently we have 2 pkt_type_offset functions doing the same thing and
spread across the architecture files. Remove those and replace them
with a PKT_TYPE_OFFSET macro helper which gets the constant value from a
zero sized sk_buff member right in front of the bitfield with offsetof.
This new offset marker does not change size of struct sk_buff.
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Reported by Mikulas Patocka, kmemcheck currently barks out a
false positive since we don't have special kmemcheck annotation
for bitfields used in bpf_prog structure.
We currently have jited:1, len:31 and thus when accessing len
while CONFIG_KMEMCHECK enabled, kmemcheck throws a warning that
we're reading uninitialized memory.
As we don't need the whole bit universe for pages member, we
can just split it to u16 and use a bool flag for jited instead
of a bitfield.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Introduced in commit 314beb9bcabf ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit
against spraying attacks") and later on replicated in aa2d2c73c21f
("s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit code") for
s390 architecture, write protection for BPF JIT images got added and
a random start address of the JIT code, so that it's not on a page
boundary anymore.
Since both use a very similar allocator for the BPF binary header,
we can consolidate this code into the BPF core as it's mostly JIT
independant anyway.
This will also allow for future archs that support DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX
to just reuse instead of reimplementing it.
JIT tested on x86_64 and s390x with BPF test suite.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
With eBPF getting more extended and exposure to user space is on it's way,
hardening the memory range the interpreter uses to steer its command flow
seems appropriate. This patch moves the to be interpreted bytecode to
read-only pages.
In case we execute a corrupted BPF interpreter image for some reason e.g.
caused by an attacker which got past a verifier stage, it would not only
provide arbitrary read/write memory access but arbitrary function calls
as well. After setting up the BPF interpreter image, its contents do not
change until destruction time, thus we can setup the image on immutable
made pages in order to mitigate modifications to that code. The idea
is derived from commit 314beb9bcabf ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit
against spraying attacks").
This is possible because bpf_prog is not part of sk_filter anymore.
After setup bpf_prog cannot be altered during its life-time. This prevents
any modifications to the entire bpf_prog structure (incl. function/JIT
image pointer).
Every eBPF program (including classic BPF that are migrated) have to call
bpf_prog_select_runtime() to select either interpreter or a JIT image
as a last setup step, and they all are being freed via bpf_prog_free(),
including non-JIT. Therefore, we can easily integrate this into the
eBPF life-time, plus since we directly allocate a bpf_prog, we have no
performance penalty.
Tested with seccomp and test_bpf testsuite in JIT/non-JIT mode and manual
inspection of kernel_page_tables. Brad Spengler proposed the same idea
via Twitter during development of this patch.
Joint work with Hannes Frederic Sowa.
Suggested-by: Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
clean up names related to socket filtering and bpf in the following way:
- everything that deals with sockets keeps 'sk_*' prefix
- everything that is pure BPF is changed to 'bpf_*' prefix
split 'struct sk_filter' into
struct sk_filter {
atomic_t refcnt;
struct rcu_head rcu;
struct bpf_prog *prog;
};
and
struct bpf_prog {
u32 jited:1,
len:31;
struct sock_fprog_kern *orig_prog;
unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const struct sk_buff *skb,
const struct bpf_insn *filter);
union {
struct sock_filter insns[0];
struct bpf_insn insnsi[0];
struct work_struct work;
};
};
so that 'struct bpf_prog' can be used independent of sockets and cleans up
'unattached' bpf use cases
split SK_RUN_FILTER macro into:
SK_RUN_FILTER to be used with 'struct sk_filter *' and
BPF_PROG_RUN to be used with 'struct bpf_prog *'
__sk_filter_release(struct sk_filter *) gains
__bpf_prog_release(struct bpf_prog *) helper function
also perform related renames for the functions that work
with 'struct bpf_prog *', since they're on the same lines:
sk_filter_size -> bpf_prog_size
sk_filter_select_runtime -> bpf_prog_select_runtime
sk_filter_free -> bpf_prog_free
sk_unattached_filter_create -> bpf_prog_create
sk_unattached_filter_destroy -> bpf_prog_destroy
sk_store_orig_filter -> bpf_prog_store_orig_filter
sk_release_orig_filter -> bpf_release_orig_filter
__sk_migrate_filter -> bpf_migrate_filter
__sk_prepare_filter -> bpf_prepare_filter
API for attaching classic BPF to a socket stays the same:
sk_attach_filter(prog, struct sock *)/sk_detach_filter(struct sock *)
and SK_RUN_FILTER(struct sk_filter *, ctx) to execute a program
which is used by sockets, tun, af_packet
API for 'unattached' BPF programs becomes:
bpf_prog_create(struct bpf_prog **)/bpf_prog_destroy(struct bpf_prog *)
and BPF_PROG_RUN(struct bpf_prog *, ctx) to execute a program
which is used by isdn, ppp, team, seccomp, ptp, xt_bpf, cls_bpf, test_bpf
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This patch finally allows us to get rid of the BPF_S_* enum.
Currently, the code performs unnecessary encode and decode
workarounds in seccomp and filter migration itself when a filter
is being attached in order to overcome BPF_S_* encoding which
is not used anymore by the new interpreter resp. JIT compilers.
Keeping it around would mean that also in future we would need
to extend and maintain this enum and related encoders/decoders.
We can get rid of all that and save us these operations during
filter attaching. Naturally, also JIT compilers need to be updated
by this.
Before JIT conversion is being done, each compiler checks if A
is being loaded at startup to obtain information if it needs to
emit instructions to clear A first. Since BPF extensions are a
subset of BPF_LD | BPF_{W,H,B} | BPF_ABS variants, case statements
for extensions can be removed at that point. To ease and minimalize
code changes in the classic JITs, we have introduced bpf_anc_helper().
Tested with test_bpf on x86_64 (JIT, int), s390x (JIT, int),
arm (JIT, int), i368 (int), ppc64 (JIT, int); for sparc we
unfortunately didn't have access, but changes are analogous to
the rest.
Joint work with Alexei Starovoitov.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Chema Gonzalez <chemag@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This is the s390 variant of Alexei's JIT bug fix.
(patch description below stolen from Alexei's patch)
bpf_alloc_binary() adds 128 bytes of room to JITed program image
and rounds it up to the nearest page size. If image size is close
to page size (like 4000), it is rounded to two pages:
round_up(4000 + 4 + 128) == 8192
then 'hole' is computed as 8192 - (4000 + 4) = 4188
If prandom_u32() % hole selects a number >= PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(*header)
then kernel will crash during bpf_jit_free():
kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:887!
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81037285>] change_page_attr_set_clr+0x135/0x460
[<ffffffff81694cc0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
[<ffffffff810378ff>] set_memory_rw+0x2f/0x40
[<ffffffffa01a0d8d>] bpf_jit_free_deferred+0x2d/0x60
[<ffffffff8106bf98>] process_one_work+0x1d8/0x6a0
[<ffffffff8106bf38>] ? process_one_work+0x178/0x6a0
[<ffffffff8106c90c>] worker_thread+0x11c/0x370
since bpf_jit_free() does:
unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)fp->bpf_func & PAGE_MASK;
struct bpf_binary_header *header = (void *)addr;
to compute start address of 'bpf_binary_header'
and header->pages will pass junk to:
set_memory_rw(addr, header->pages);
Fix it by making sure that &header->image[prandom_u32() % hole] and &header
are in the same page.
Fixes: aa2d2c73c21f2 ("s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit code")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.11+
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The A register needs to be initialized to zero in the prolog if the
first instruction of the BPF program is BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH to prevent
leaking the content of %r5 to user space.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
This patch adds a jited flag into sk_filter struct in order to indicate
whether a filter is currently jited or not. The size of sk_filter is
not being expanded as the 32 bit 'len' member allows upper bits to be
reused since a filter can currently only grow as large as BPF_MAXINSNS.
Therefore, there's enough room also for other in future needed flags to
reuse 'len' field if necessary. The jited flag also allows for having
alternative interpreter functions running as currently, we can only
detect jit compiled filters by testing fp->bpf_func to not equal the
address of sk_run_filter().
Joint work with Alexei Starovoitov.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The packet hash can be considered a property of the packet, not just
on RX path.
This patch changes name of rxhash and l4_rxhash skbuff fields to be
hash and l4_hash respectively. This includes changing uses of the
field in the code which don't call the access functions.
Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The s390 bpf jit compiler emits the signed divide instructions "dr" and "d"
for unsigned divisions.
This can cause problems: the dividend will be zero extended to a 64 bit value
and the divisor is the 32 bit signed value as specified A or X accumulator,
even though A and X are supposed to be treated as unsigned values.
The divide instrunctions will generate an exception if the result cannot be
expressed with a 32 bit signed value.
This is the case if e.g. the dividend is 0xffffffff and the divisor either 1
or also 0xffffffff (signed: -1).
To avoid all these issues simply use unsigned divide instructions.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
At first Jakub Zawadzki noticed that some divisions by reciprocal_divide
were not correct. (off by one in some cases)
http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/reciprocal-buggy.c
He could also show this with BPF:
http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/set-and-dump-filter-k-bug.c
The reciprocal divide in linux kernel is not generic enough,
lets remove its use in BPF, as it is not worth the pain with
current cpus.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws@darkjames.pl>
Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dxchgb@gmail.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The prolog of functions generated by the bpf jit compiler uses an
instruction sequence with an "ahi" instruction to create stack space
instead of using an "aghi" instruction. Using the 32-bit "ahi" is not
wrong as the stack we are operating on is an order-4 allocation which
is always aligned to 16KB. But it is more consistent to use an "aghi"
as the stack pointer is a 64-bit value.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
Now that the in-kernel disassembler has an own header file move the
disassembler related function prototypes to that header file.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
on x86 system with net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1
sudo tcpdump -i eth1 'tcp port 22'
causes the warning:
[ 56.766097] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 56.766097]
[ 56.780146] CPU0
[ 56.786807] ----
[ 56.793188] lock(&(&vb->lock)->rlock);
[ 56.799593] <Interrupt>
[ 56.805889] lock(&(&vb->lock)->rlock);
[ 56.812266]
[ 56.812266] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 56.812266]
[ 56.830670] 1 lock held by ksoftirqd/1/13:
[ 56.836838] #0: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8118f44c>] vm_unmap_aliases+0x8c/0x380
[ 56.849757]
[ 56.849757] stack backtrace:
[ 56.862194] CPU: 1 PID: 13 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc3+ #45
[ 56.868721] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P8Z77 WS, BIOS 3007 07/26/2012
[ 56.882004] ffffffff821944c0 ffff88080bbdb8c8 ffffffff8175a145 0000000000000007
[ 56.895630] ffff88080bbd5f40 ffff88080bbdb928 ffffffff81755b14 0000000000000001
[ 56.909313] ffff880800000001 ffff880800000000 ffffffff8101178f 0000000000000001
[ 56.923006] Call Trace:
[ 56.929532] [<ffffffff8175a145>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
[ 56.936067] [<ffffffff81755b14>] print_usage_bug+0x1f7/0x208
[ 56.942445] [<ffffffff8101178f>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50
[ 56.948932] [<ffffffff810cc0a0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x150/0x150
[ 56.955470] [<ffffffff810ccb52>] mark_lock+0x282/0x2c0
[ 56.961945] [<ffffffff810ccfed>] __lock_acquire+0x45d/0x1d50
[ 56.968474] [<ffffffff810cce6e>] ? __lock_acquire+0x2de/0x1d50
[ 56.975140] [<ffffffff81393bf5>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x55/0x90
[ 56.981942] [<ffffffff810cef72>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x1d0
[ 56.988745] [<ffffffff8118f52a>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380
[ 56.995619] [<ffffffff817628f1>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50
[ 57.002493] [<ffffffff8118f52a>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380
[ 57.009447] [<ffffffff8118f52a>] vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380
[ 57.016477] [<ffffffff8118f44c>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x8c/0x380
[ 57.023607] [<ffffffff810436b0>] change_page_attr_set_clr+0xc0/0x460
[ 57.030818] [<ffffffff810cfb8d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 57.037896] [<ffffffff811a8330>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb0/0x2b0
[ 57.044789] [<ffffffff811b59c3>] ? free_object_rcu+0x93/0xa0
[ 57.051720] [<ffffffff81043d9f>] set_memory_rw+0x2f/0x40
[ 57.058727] [<ffffffff8104e17c>] bpf_jit_free+0x2c/0x40
[ 57.065577] [<ffffffff81642cba>] sk_filter_release_rcu+0x1a/0x30
[ 57.072338] [<ffffffff811108e2>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x202/0x7c0
[ 57.078962] [<ffffffff81057f17>] __do_softirq+0xf7/0x3f0
[ 57.085373] [<ffffffff81058245>] run_ksoftirqd+0x35/0x70
cannot reuse jited filter memory, since it's readonly,
so use original bpf insns memory to hold work_struct
defer kfree of sk_filter until jit completed freeing
tested on x86_64 and i386
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Add misssing braces to hole calculation. This resulted in an addition
instead of an substraction. Which in turn means that the jit compiler
could try to write out of bounds of the allocated piece of memory.
This bug was introduced with aa2d2c73 "s390/bpf,jit: address randomize
and write protect jit code".
Fixes this one:
[ 37.320956] Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address 000003ff80231000
[ 37.320984] Oops: 0011 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 37.320993] Modules linked in: dm_multipath scsi_dh eadm_sch dm_mod ctcm fsm autofs4
[ 37.321007] CPU: 28 PID: 6443 Comm: multipathd Not tainted 3.10.9-61.x.20130829-s390xdefault #1
[ 37.321011] task: 0000004ada778000 ti: 0000004ae3304000 task.ti: 0000004ae3304000
[ 37.321014] Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 000000000012d1de (bpf_jit_compile+0x198e/0x23d0)
[ 37.321022] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 EA:3
Krnl GPRS: 000000004350207d 0000004a00000001 0000000000000007 000003ff80231002
[ 37.321029] 0000000000000007 000003ff80230ffe 00000000a7740000 000003ff80230f76
[ 37.321032] 000003ffffffffff 000003ff00000000 000003ff0000007d 000000000071e820
[ 37.321035] 0000004adbe99950 000000000071ea18 0000004af3d9e7c0 0000004ae3307b80
[ 37.321046] Krnl Code: 000000000012d1d0: 41305004 la %r3,4(%r5)
000000000012d1d4: e330f0f80021 clg %r3,248(%r15)
#000000000012d1da: a7240009 brc 2,12d1ec
>000000000012d1de: 50805000 st %r8,0(%r5)
000000000012d1e2: e330f0f00004 lg %r3,240(%r15)
000000000012d1e8: 41303004 la %r3,4(%r3)
000000000012d1ec: e380f0e00004 lg %r8,224(%r15)
000000000012d1f2: e330f0f00024 stg %r3,240(%r15)
[ 37.321074] Call Trace:
[ 37.321077] ([<000000000012da78>] bpf_jit_compile+0x2228/0x23d0)
[ 37.321083] [<00000000006007c2>] sk_attach_filter+0xfe/0x214
[ 37.321090] [<00000000005d2d92>] sock_setsockopt+0x926/0xbdc
[ 37.321097] [<00000000005cbfb6>] SyS_setsockopt+0x8a/0xe8
[ 37.321101] [<00000000005ccaa8>] SyS_socketcall+0x264/0x364
[ 37.321106] [<0000000000713f1c>] sysc_nr_ok+0x22/0x28
[ 37.321113] [<000003fffce10ea8>] 0x3fffce10ea8
[ 37.321118] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 37.321121] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
[ 37.321124] [<000000000012d192>] bpf_jit_compile+0x1942/0x23d0
[ 37.321132]
[ 37.321135] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.11
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
|
|
s390 version of 3b58908a "x86: bpf_jit_comp: add pkt_type support".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
|
|
This is the s390 variant of 314beb9b "x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf
jit against spraying attacks".
With this change the whole jit code and literal pool will be write
protected after creation. In addition the start address of the jit
code won't be always on a page boundary anymore.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
This is the s390 backend of 79617801 "filter: bpf_jit_comp: refactor
and unify BPF JIT image dump output".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
The workqueue workaround is no longer needed. Same as 5199dfe531
"sparc: bpf_jit_comp: can call module_free() from any context".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stelian Nirlu <steliannirlu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
s390 version of 855ddb56 "x86: bpf_jit_comp: add vlan tag support".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
Add support for XOR instruction for use with X/K.
s390 JIT support for the new BPF_S_ALU_XOR_* instructions introduced
with 9e49e889 "filter: add XOR instruction for use with X/K".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
Add support for MOD operation for s390's JIT.
Same as 280050cc "x86 bpf_jit: support MOD operation" for x86 which
adds JIT support for the generic new MOD operation introduced with
b6069a9570 "filter: add MOD operation".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
Add support for new BPF_S_ANC_ALU_XOR_X instruction which got added
with ffe06c17 "filter: add XOR operation".
s390 version of 4bfaddf1 "x86 bpf_jit: support BPF_S_ANC_ALU_XOR_X instruction".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
Make use of new immediate instructions that came with the
extended immediate and general instruction extension facilities.
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
The s390 implementation of the JIT compiler for packet filter speedup.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
