summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/sh/math-emu/sfp-util.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2010-05-26Revert "endian: #define __BYTE_ORDER"Linus Torvalds
This reverts commit b3b77c8caef1750ebeea1054e39e358550ea9f55, which was also totally broken (see commit 0d2daf5cc858 that reverted the crc32 version of it). As reported by Stephen Rothwell, it causes problems on big-endian machines: > In file included from fs/jfs/jfs_types.h:33, > from fs/jfs/jfs_incore.h:26, > from fs/jfs/file.c:22: > fs/jfs/endian24.h:36:101: warning: "__LITTLE_ENDIAN" is not defined The kernel has never had that crazy "__BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN" model. It's not how we do things, and it isn't how we _should_ do things. So don't go there. Requested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-05-25endian: #define __BYTE_ORDERJoakim Tjernlund
Linux does not define __BYTE_ORDER in its endian header files which makes some header files bend backwards to get at the current endian. Lets #define __BYTE_ORDER in big_endian.h/litte_endian.h to make it easier for header files that are used in user space too. In userspace the convention is that 1. _both_ __LITTLE_ENDIAN and __BIG_ENDIAN are defined, 2. you have to test for e.g. __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2006-09-27sh: math-emu supportTakashi YOSHII
This implements initial math-emu support, aimed primarily at SH-3. Signed-off-by: Takashi YOSHII <takasi-y@ops.dti.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>