summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2010-03-14Merge branches 'battery-2.6.34', 'bugzilla-10805', 'bugzilla-14668', ↵Len Brown
'bugzilla-531916-power-state', 'ht-warn-2.6.34', 'pnp', 'processor-rename', 'sony-2.6.34', 'suse-bugzilla-531547', 'tz-check', 'video' and 'misc-2.6.34' into release
2010-02-16ACPI: remove superfluous NULL pointer check from ↵Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
acpi_processor_get_throttling_info() Dan's list contains: drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c +1139 acpi_processor_get_throttling_info(11) warning: variable derefenced before check 'pr' acpi_processor_get_throttling_info() is never called with pr == NULL. [ bart: the potential NULL pointer dereference was finally fixed in (much later than mine) commit 5cfa245 but my patch is still valid ] Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-01-28ACPI: replace acpi_integer by u64Lin Ming
acpi_integer is now obsolete and removed from the ACPICA code base, replaced by u64. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-11-05ACPI: Move dereference after NULL testJulia Lawall
If the NULL test on pr is needed, then the dereference should be after the NULL test. A simplified version of the semantic match that detects this problem is as follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/): // <smpl> @match exists@ expression x, E; identifier fld; @@ * x->fld ... when != \(x = E\|&x\) * x == NULL // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-09-24cpumask: use zalloc_cpumask_var() where possibleLi Zefan
Remove open-coded zalloc_cpumask_var() and zalloc_cpumask_var_node(). Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-09-19Merge branch 'processor-procfs-2.6.32' into releaseLen Brown
2009-08-28ACPI: Move definition of PREFIX from acpi_bus.h to internal..hLen Brown
Linux/ACPI core files using internal.h all PREFIX "ACPI: ", however, not all ACPI drivers use/want it -- and they should not have to #undef PREFIX to define their own. Add GPL commment to internal.h while we are there. This does not change any actual console output, asside from a whitespace fix. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-08-26acpi processor: remove superfluous warning messageFrans Pop
This failure is very common on many platforms. Handling it in the ACPI processor driver is enough, and we don't need a warning message unless CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is set. Based on a patch from Zhang Rui. Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-08-26ACPI processor: force throttling state when BIOS returns incorrect valueFrans Pop
If the BIOS reports an invalid throttling state (which seems to be fairly common after system boot), a reset is done to state T0. Because of a check in acpi_processor_get_throttling_ptc(), the reset never actually gets executed, which results in the error reoccurring on every access of for example /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling. Add a 'force' option to acpi_processor_set_throttling() to ensure the reset really takes effect. Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 This patch, together with the next one, fixes a regression introduced in 2.6.30, listed on the regression list. They have been available for 2.5 months now in bugzilla, but have not been picked up, despite various reminders and without any reason given. Google shows that numerous people are hitting this issue. The issue is in itself relatively minor, but the bug in the code is clear. The patches have been in all my kernels and today testing has shown that throttling works correctly with the patches applied when the system overheats (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918#c14). Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-06-24ACPI: Make ACPI processor proc I/F depend on the ACPI_PROCFSZhao Yakui
Now whether the ACPI processor proc I/F is registered depends on the CONFIG_PROC. It had better depend on the CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS. When the CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS is unset in kernel configuration, the ACPI processor proc I/F won't be registered. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-05-29ACPI processor: remove spurious newline from warning messageFrans Pop
Commit 4973b22a ("ACPI processor: reset the throttling state once it's invalid") introduced a new warning which prints a spurious newline. The ACPI_WARNING macro that is used already takes care of adding a newline, after adding ACPI_CA_VERSION to the message. Remove the newline to avoid the message getting split into two lines. Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-05-15ACPI processor: reset the throttling state once it's invalidZhang Rui
If the BIOS hands us an invalid throttling state, write a valid state. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13259 Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: James Ettle <theholyettlz@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-05-15ACPI processor: introduce module parameter processor.ignore_tpcZhang Rui
Introduce module parameter processor.ignore_tpc. Some laptops are shipped with buggy _TPC, this module parameter is used to to disable the buggy support. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13259 Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: James Ettle <theholyettlz@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-04-05Merge branch 'misc' into releaseLen Brown
2009-04-03ACPI: constify VFTs (1/2)Jan Engelhardt
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-04-03ACPI: get_throttling_state() cannot be larger than state_countLen Brown
Reported-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-01-03cpumask: convert shared_cpu_map in acpi_processor* structs to cpumask_var_tRusty Russell
Impact: Reduce memory usage, use new API. This is part of an effort to reduce structure sizes for machines configured with large NR_CPUS. cpumask_t gets replaced by cpumask_var_t, which is either struct cpumask[1] (small NR_CPUS) or struct cpumask * (large NR_CPUS). (Changes to powernow-k* by <travis>.) Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-11-07ACPI: consolidate ACPI_*_COMPONENT definitions in acpi_drivers.hBjorn Helgaas
Move all the component definitions for drivers to a single shared place, include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-22Merge branch 'ull' into testLen Brown
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/bay.c drivers/acpi/dock.c drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-22ACPI: replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, ...) with printkLin Ming
ACPI_DB_ERROR and ACPI_DB_WARN were removed from ACPICA core. So replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, ...) with printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX ...) and ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN, ...) with printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX ...) We do not use ACPI_ERROR/ACPI_WARNING since they're not exported, see ------------------------------------------------------------- commit 6468463abd7051fcc29f3ee7c931f9bbbb26f5a4 Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Date: Mon Jun 26 23:41:38 2006 -0400 ACPI: un-export ACPI_ERROR() -- use printk(KERN_ERR...) Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> ------------------------------------------------------------- Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-11ACPI: Change acpi_evaluate_integer to support 64-bit on 32-bit kernelsMatthew Wilcox
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms. Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support 64-bit integers on all platforms. lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long" lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update() Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-07-26cpumask: change cpumask_of_cpu_ptr to use new cpumask_of_cpuMike Travis
* Replace previous instances of the cpumask_of_cpu_ptr* macros with a the new (lvalue capable) generic cpumask_of_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-18cpumask: Replace cpumask_of_cpu with cpumask_of_cpu_ptrMike Travis
* This patch replaces the dangerous lvalue version of cpumask_of_cpu with new cpumask_of_cpu_ptr macros. These are patterned after the node_to_cpumask_ptr macros. In general terms, if there is a cpumask_of_cpu_map[] then a pointer to the cpumask_of_cpu_map[cpu] entry is used. The cpumask_of_cpu_map is provided when there is a large NR_CPUS count, reducing greatly the amount of code generated and stack space used for cpumask_of_cpu(). The pointer to the cpumask_t value is needed for calling set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to reduce the amount of stack space needed to pass the cpumask_t value. If there isn't a cpumask_of_cpu_map[], then a temporary variable is declared and filled in with value from cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) as well as a pointer variable pointing to this temporary variable. Afterwards, the pointer is used to reference the cpumask value. The compiler will optimize out the extra dereference through the pointer as well as the stack space used for the pointer, resulting in identical code. A good example of the orthogonal usages is in net/sunrpc/svc.c: case SVC_POOL_PERCPU: { unsigned int cpu = m->pool_to[pidx]; cpumask_of_cpu_ptr(cpumask, cpu); *oldmask = current->cpus_allowed; set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask); return 1; } case SVC_POOL_PERNODE: { unsigned int node = m->pool_to[pidx]; node_to_cpumask_ptr(nodecpumask, node); *oldmask = current->cpus_allowed; set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, nodecpumask); return 1; } Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-18Merge branch 'linus' into cpus4096Ingo Molnar
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-16acpi: fix printk format warningRandy Dunlap
Fix printk format warning: linux-next-20080617/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:1258: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: fix processor throttling set errorYi Yang
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 When echo some invalid values to /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling, there isn't any error info returned, on the contray, it sets throttling value to some T* successfully, obviously, this is incorrect, a correct way should be to let it fail and return error info. This patch fixed the aforementioned issue, it also enables /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling to accept such values as 't0' and 'T0', it also strictly limits /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling only to accept "*", "t*" and "T*", "*" is the throttling state value the processor can support, current, it is 0 - 7. Before applying this patch, the test result is below: [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T1 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% *T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# echo "1xxxxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T1 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% *T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# cd / [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T100" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "2xxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T2 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% *T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "7777" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost /]# echo "7xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# After applying this patch, the test result is below: [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# vi drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "7000" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo $? 0 [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo t0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo Tt0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: change processors from array to per_cpu variableMike Travis
Change processors from an array sized by NR_CPUS to a per_cpu variable. Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-05-23acpi: use performance variant for_each_cpu_mask_nrMike Travis
Change references from for_each_cpu_mask to for_each_cpu_mask_nr where appropriate Reviewed-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-29acpi: use non-racy method for proc entries creationDenis V. Lunev
Use proc_create()/proc_create_data() to make sure that ->proc_fops and ->data be setup before gluing PDE to main tree. Add correct ->owner to proc_fops to fix reading/module unloading race. Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-19generic: use new set_cpus_allowed_ptr functionMike Travis
* Use new set_cpus_allowed_ptr() function added by previous patch, which instead of passing the "newly allowed cpus" cpumask_t arg by value, pass it by pointer: -int set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, cpumask_t new_mask) +int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const cpumask_t *new_mask) * Modify CPU_MASK_ALL Depends on: [sched-devel]: sched: add new set_cpus_allowed_ptr function Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-02-02ACPI: throttling: fix build warningLen Brown
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-02ACPI: Update the t-state for every affected cpu when t-state is changedZhao Yakui
According to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross logical processor dependency information to OSPM. So the t-state coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu is changed. According to ACPI spec, three types of coordination are defined. SW_ALL, SW_ANY and HW_ALL. SW_ALL: it means that OSPM needs to initiate T-state transition on all processors in the domain. It is necessary to call throttling set function for all affected cpus. SW_ANY: it means that OSPM may initiate T-state transition on any processor in the domain. HW_ALL: Spec only says that hardware will perform the coordination and doesn't recommend how OSPM coordinate T-state among the affected cpus. So it is treated as the type of SW_ALL. It means that OSPM needs to initiate t-state transition on all the processors in the domain. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-02ACPI : Add T-state event notifier functionZhao Yakui
The t-state coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu is changed.It means that OSPM should select one proper target T-state for the all affected cpus before updating T-state. So the function of acpi_processor_throttling_notifier is added. Before updating T-state it can be called for all the affected cpus to get the proper target T-state, which can meet the requirement of thermal, user and _TPC. After updating T-state, it can be called to update T-state flag. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-02ACPI : Update T-state coordination after getting _TSD infoZhao Yakui
Accordint to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross logical processor dependency information to OSPM. After the _TSD data for all cpus are obtained, OSPM will set up the T-state coordination between CPUs. Of course if the _TSD doesn't exist or _TSD data is incorrect , it is assumed that there is no T-state coordination and T-state is changed independently. Now there is no proper solution to update T-state coordination after one cpu is hotplugged. So this patch won't support hotplugged cpu very well. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-02ACPI : Check parameter when calling acpi_processor_get/set_throttlingZhao Yakui
It is necessary to check the parameter when calling the function of acpi_processor_get/set_throttling function so as to avoid the NULL pointer reference in pr or throttling. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-15ACPI: processor: Fix null pointer dereference in throttlingAlexey Starikovskiy
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-01ACPI: Delete the IRQ operation in throttling controll via PTCZhao Yakui
The IRQ operation(enable/disable) should be avoided when throttling is controlled via PTC method. It is replaced by the migration of task. This fixes an oops on T61 -- a regression due to f79f06ab9f86 b/c FixedHW support tried to read remote MSR with interrupts disabled. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-11-16ACPI: Enable MSR (FixedHW) support for T-StatesZhao Yakui
Add throttling control via MSR when T-states uses the FixHW Control Status registers. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-11-16ACPI: Use _TSS for throttling control, when present. Add error checks.Zhao Yakui
_TSS was erroneously ignored, in favor of the FADT. When TSS is used, the access width is included in the PTC control/status register. So it is unnecessary that the access bit width is multiplied by 8. At the same time the bit_offset should be considered for system I/O Access. It should be checked the bit_width and bit_offset of PTC regsiter in order to avoid the failure of system I/O access. It means that bit_width plus bit_offset can't be greater than 32. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-11-16ACPI: throttle: Change internal APIs better handle _PTCZhao Yakui
Change the function interface for throttling control via PTC. The following functions are concerned: acpi_read_throttling_status() acpi_write_throttling_state() acpi_get_throttling_value() acpi_get_throttling_state() Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-11-16ACPI: If _TSS exists, do not access FADT.duty_widthZhao Yakui
Factor out legacy FADT.duty_width code and run it only in the non _TSS case. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-11-16ACPI: Enforce T-state limit changes immediatelyZhao Yakui
When a T-state limit change notification is received, Linux must evaluate _TPC and change its current T-state immediately to comply with the new limit. Previously, Linux would notice the new limit only upon the next throttling change. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-25ACPI: quiet ACPI Exceptions due to no _PTC or _TSSLen Brown
ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0084): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PTC [20070126] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0147): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _TSS [20070126] These methods are optional, so Linux should not alarm users when they are not found. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8802 Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Acked-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
2007-07-23ACPI: fix oops due to typo in new throttling codeLuming Yu
Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-03ACPI: staticAdrian Bunk
make 2 needlessly global functions static. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-06-02ACPI: Lindent processor throttling codeLen Brown
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-06-02ACPI: add ACPI 3.0 _TPC _TSS _PTC throttling supportLuming Yu
adds _TPC _TSS _PTC -- Throttling Present Capabilities Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-02-12ACPI: delete extra #defines in /drivers/acpi/ driversLen Brown
Cosmetic only. Except in a single case, #define ACPI_*_DRIVER_NAME were invoked 0 or 1 times. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-02-12ACPI: clean up ACPI_MODULE_NAME() useLen Brown
cosmetic only Make "module name" actually match the file name. Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care. Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-02-02ACPICA: use new ACPI headers.Alexey Starikovskiy
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 (git 2.46.0) at 2024-12-20 07:49:49 +0000