summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/char/bsr.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2010-08-01of/address: Clean up function declarationsGrant Likely
This patch moves the declaration of of_get_address(), of_get_pci_address(), and of_pci_address_to_resource() out of arch code and into the common linux/of_address header file. This patch also fixes some of the asm/prom.h ordering issues. It still includes some header files that it ideally shouldn't be, but at least the ordering is consistent now so that of_* overrides work. Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
2010-04-23Merge branch 'master' into for-nextJiri Kosina
2010-03-30include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking ↵Tejun Heo
implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-15powerpc/BSR: fix device_create() return value checkJani Nikula
Use IS_ERR() instead of comparing to NULL. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@nokia.com> Acked-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2009-06-26powerpc/BSR: Fix BSR to allow mmap of small BSR on 64k kernelSonny Rao
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:26:13AM -0600, Sonny Rao wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:28:29PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > Sonny Rao writes: > > > > > Fix the BSR driver to allow small BSR devices, which are limited to a > > > single 4k space, on a 64k page kernel. Previously the driver would > > > reject the mmap since the size was smaller than PAGESIZE (or because > > > the size was greater than the size of the device). Now, we check for > > > this case use remap_4k_pfn(). Also, take out code to set vm_flags, > > > as the remap_pfn functions will do this for us. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Do we know that the BSR size will always be 4k if it's not a multiple > > of 64k? Is it possible that we could get 8k, 16k or 32k or BSRs? > > If it is possible, what does the user need to be able to do? Do they > > just want to map 4k, or might then want to map the whole thing? > > > Hi Paul, I took a look at changing the driver to reject a request for > mapping more than a single 4k page, however the only indication we get > of the requested size in the mmap function is the vma size, and this > is always one page at minimum. So, it's not possible to determine if > the user wants one 4k page or more. As I noted in my first response, > there is only one case where this is even possible and I don't think > it is a significant concern. > > I did notice that I left out the check to see if the user is trying to > map more than the device length, so I fixed that. Here's the revised > patch. Alright, I've reworked this now so that if we get one of these cases where there's a bsr that's > 4k and < 64k on a 64k kernel we'll only advertise that it is a 4k BSR to userspace. I think this is the best solution since user programs are only supposed to look at sysfs to determine how much can be mapped, and libbsr does this as well. Please consider for 2.6.31 as a fix, thanks. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2009-06-26powerpc/BSR: add 4096 byte BSR sizeSonny Rao
Add a 4096 byte BSR size which will be used on new machines. Also, remove the warning when we run into an unknown size, as this can spam the kernel log excessively. Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2009-03-30trivial: drivers/char/bsr.c: Storage class should be before const qualifierTobias Klauser
The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5: The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent feature. Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2009-01-13powerpc: Cleanup from l64 to ll64 change: drivers/charStephen Rothwell
This is a powerpc specific driver. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2008-12-03powerpc/BSR: Support multiple OF-node description of BSRSonny Rao
This adds support for multiple BSR nodes in the OF device tree. Previously, the BSR driver only supported a single OF node describing a BSR. Apparently when an LPAR is set to use "all system resources" the BSR appears as a single node, but when it is handed out in pieces, each 8 byte piece gets its own node. So, this keeps a list of BSR devices instead of the array and includes all nodes. Also, this makes the code be more inclusive of what BSR devices we accept by only checking compatibility and not the device name property (which might change in the future versions of BSR). Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2008-10-16device create: char: convert device_create_drvdata to device_createGreg Kroah-Hartman
Now that device_create() has been audited, rename things back to the original call to be sane. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2008-07-15powerpc: Add driver for Barrier Synchronization RegisterSonny Rao
Adds a character driver for BSR support on IBM POWER systems including Power5 and Power6. The BSR is an optional processor facility not currently implemented by any other processors. It's primary purpose is fast large SMP synchronization. More details on the BSR are in comments to the code which follows. This patch adds BSR driver to pseries_defconfig. Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>