| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
More accurate as to the function of the opcodes. Not only is FB disabled,
but the host is prevented from touching the GPU. An upcoming patch for
Kepler will also halt PFIFO (as NVIDIA does).
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Time measured from disabling FB to re-enabling, PPWR_IN reveals status of
heads at the end of script. Helps debug various issues (like flicker).
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Needs to be done after wait-for-VBLANK, and NVA3 requires register writes
in between.
Rather than hard-coding register writes, just split out fb_disable and
fb_enable.
v2. Squashed "fb/ramnve0: disable fb before reclocking"
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
The problem with the current implementation is that adding a timer improperly
checked which process would time up first by not taking into account how much
time elapsed since their timer got scheduled. Rework the re-scheduling
decision t fix this.
The catch with this fix is that we are limited to scheduling timers of up to
2^31 ticks to avoid any potential overflow. Since we are unlikely to need to
wait for more than a second, this won't be a problem :)
Another possible fix would be to decrement the timeouts of all processes but
it would duplicate a lot of code and dealing with edge cases wasn't pretty
last time I checked.
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
For some reason, it is now required to wait a 20 µs after the 0x200 reset of
the engine.
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
As documented at:
ftp://download.nvidia.com/open-gpu-doc/gk104-disable-graphics-power-gating/1/gk104-disable-graphics-power-gating.txt
NVIDIA were not able document the steps necessary to detect whether this
is required or not at this time. However, they did confirm that this
procedure is safe to perform unconditionally on GK104/6. GK107 does not
have the power gating feature, and it was recommended that we do not
perform these steps there as the effects were not verified.
The disable path is from observing the binary driver, and not
documented in the link above.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
