| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The kernel.h macro DIV_ROUND_UP performs the computation (((n) + (d) - 1) /
(d)) but is perhaps more readable.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
|
|
I will not commit even trivial and obvious one-line fixes without building.
I will not commit even trivial and obvious one-line fixes without building.
I will not commit even trivial and obvious one-line fixes without building.
I will not commit even trivial and obvious one-line fixes without building.
Only clever people can get away with that.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
As was discussed between Ricard Wanderlöf, David Woodhouse, Artem
Bityutskiy and me, the current API for reading/writing OOB is confusing.
The thing that introduces confusion is the need to specify ops.len
together with ops.ooblen for reads/writes that concern only OOB not data
area. So, ops.len is overloaded: when ops.datbuf != NULL it serves to
specify the length of the data read, and when ops.datbuf == NULL, it
serves to specify the full OOB read length.
The patch inlined below is the slightly updated version of the previous
patch serving the same purpose, but with the new Artem's comments taken
into account.
Artem, BTW, thanks a lot for your valuable input!
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Says akpm: ' - search for "( " and " )", fix.'
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Don't include <linux/config.h>.
Don't say 'MB' where you mean 'MiB'.
Don't allocate 512 bytes on the stack.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Claudio Lanconelli <lanconelli.claudio@eptar.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
