summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-12-02Merge branch 'raid56-scrub-replace' of git://github.com/miaoxie/linux-btrfs ↵Chris Mason
into for-linus
2014-12-03Btrfs, replace: enable dev-replace for raid56Zhao Lei
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2014-12-03Btrfs, raid56: fix use-after-free problem in the final device replace ↵Miao Xie
procedure on raid56 The commit c404e0dc (Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing procedure of the device replace) fixed a use-after-free problem which happened when removing the source device at the end of device replace, but at that time, btrfs didn't support device replace on raid56, so we didn't fix the problem on the raid56 profile. Currently, we implemented device replace for raid56, so we need kick that problem out before we enable that function for raid56. The fix method is very simple, we just increase the bio per-cpu counter before we submit a raid56 io, and decrease the counter when the raid56 io ends. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2014-11-25btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.Qu Wenruo
The following lockdep warning is triggered during xfstests: [ 1702.980872] ========================================================= [ 1702.981181] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] [ 1702.981482] 3.18.0-rc1 #27 Not tainted [ 1702.981781] --------------------------------------------------------- [ 1702.982095] kswapd0/77 just changed the state of lock: [ 1702.982415] (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa03b0b51>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x41/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 1702.982794] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past: [ 1702.983160] (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 1702.984675] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1702.985524] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock [ 1702.986799] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 1702.987681] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1702.988137] ---- ---- [ 1702.988598] lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock); [ 1702.989069] local_irq_disable(); [ 1702.989534] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1702.990038] lock(&found->groups_sem); [ 1702.990494] <Interrupt> [ 1702.990938] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1702.991407] *** DEADLOCK *** It is because the btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() will call memory allocation with GFP_KERNEL, which may flush fs page cache to free space, waiting for it self to do the commit, causing the deadlock. To solve the problem, move btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() out of the dev_replace lock range, also involing split the btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev() function into remove and free parts. Now only btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev() is called in dev_replace lock range, and kobj_{add/rm} and btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev() are called out of the lock range. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-11-20Btrfs: return failure if btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() failedEryu Guan
device replace could fail due to another running scrub process or any other errors btrfs_scrub_dev() may hit, but this failure doesn't get returned to userspace. The following steps could reproduce this issue mkfs -t btrfs -f /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdb2 mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/btrfs while true; do btrfs scrub start -B /mnt/btrfs >/dev/null 2>&1; done & btrfs replace start -Bf /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs # if this replace succeeded, do the following and repeat until # you see this log in dmesg # BTRFS: btrfs_scrub_dev(/dev/sdb2, 2, /dev/sdb3) failed -115 #btrfs replace start -Bf /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/btrfs # once you see the error log in dmesg, check return value of # replace echo $? Introduce a new dev replace result BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_RESULT_SCRUB_INPROGRESS to catch -EINPROGRESS explicitly and return other errors directly to userspace. Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: make the logic of source device removing more clearMiao Xie
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: fix use-after-free problem of the device during device replaceMiao Xie
The problem is: Task0(device scan task) Task1(device replace task) scan_one_device() mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) device = find_device() mutex_lock(&device_list_mutex) lock_chunk() rm_and_free_source_device unlock_chunk() mutex_unlock(&device_list_mutex) check device Destroying the target device if device replace fails also has the same problem. We fix this problem by locking uuid_mutex during destroying source device or target device, just like the device remove operation. It is a temporary solution, we can fix this problem and make the code more clear by atomic counter in the future. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: Fix misuse of chunk mutexMiao Xie
There were several problems about chunk mutex usage: - Lock chunk mutex when updating metadata. It would cause the nested deadlock because updating metadata might need allocate new chunks that need acquire chunk mutex. We remove chunk mutex at this case, because b-tree lock and other lock mechanism can help us. - ABBA deadlock occured between device_list_mutex and chunk_mutex. When we update device status, we must acquire device_list_mutex at the beginning, and then we might get chunk_mutex during the device status update because we need allocate new chunks for metadata COW. But at most place, we acquire chunk_mutex at first and then acquire device list mutex. We need change the lock order. - Some place we needn't acquire chunk_mutex. For example we needn't get chunk_mutex when we free a empty seed fs_devices structure. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: fix unprotected device's variants on 32bits machineMiao Xie
->total_bytes,->disk_total_bytes,->bytes_used is protected by chunk lock when we change them, but sometimes we read them without any lock, and we might get unexpected value. We fix this problem like inode's i_size. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: fix wrong device bytes_used in the super blockMiao Xie
device->bytes_used will be changed when allocating a new chunk, and disk_total_size will be changed if resizing is successful. Meanwhile, the on-disk super blocks of the previous transaction might not be updated. Considering the consistency of the metadata in the previous transaction, We should use the size in the previous transaction to check if the super block is beyond the boundary of the device. Though it is not big problem because we don't use it now, but anyway it is better that we make it be consistent with the common metadata, maybe we will use it in the future. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: fix wrong disk size when writing super blocksMiao Xie
total_size will be changed when resizing a device, and disk_total_size will be changed if resizing is successful. Meanwhile, the on-disk super blocks of the previous transaction might not be updated. Considering the consistency of the metadata in the previous transaction, We should use the size in the previous transaction to check if the super block is beyond the boundary of the device. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: fix unprotected assignment of the target deviceMiao Xie
We didn't protect the assignment of the target device, it might cause the problem that the super block update was skipped because we might find wrong size of the target device during the assignment. Fix it by moving the assignment sentences into the initialization function of the target device. And there is another merit that we can check if the target device is suitable more early. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: cleanup double assignment of device->bytes_used when device replace ↵Miao Xie
finishes Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17btrfs: Fix a deadlock in btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()Qu Wenruo
btrfs-transacion:5657 [stack snip] btrfs_bio_map() btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked() percpu_counter_inc(&fs_info->bio_counter) ###bio_counter > 0(A) __btrfs_bio_map() btrfs_dev_replace_lock() mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock) ###wait mutex(B) btrfs:32612 [stack snip] btrfs_dev_replace_start() btrfs_dev_replace_lock() mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock) ###hold mutex(B) btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked() wait until percpu_counter_sum == 0 ###wait on bio_counter(A) This bug can be triggered quite easily by the following test script: http://pastebin.com/MQmb37Cy This patch will fix the ABBA problem by calling btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(). The consistency of btrfs devices list and their superblocks is protected by device_list_mutex, not btrfs_dev_replace_lock/unlock(). So it is safe the move btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(). Reported-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17btrfs: fix typo in the log messageAnand Jain
there is no matching open parenthesis for the closing parenthesis Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17btrfs: fix rw_devices miss match after seed replaceAnand Jain
reproducer: reproducer: mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs dev add /dev/sdc /btrfs btrfs rep start -B /dev/sdb /dev/sdd /btrfs umount /btrfs WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3882 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:892 __btrfs_close_devices+0x1c8/0x200 [btrfs]() which is WARN_ON(fs_devices->rw_devices); The problem here is that we did not add one to the rw_devices when we replace the seed device with a writable device. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-28btrfs: dev replace should replace the sysfs entryAnand Jain
when we replace the device its corresponding sysfs entry has to be replaced as well Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09btrfs: replace EINVAL with EOPNOTSUPP for dev_replace raid56Gui Hecheng
To return EOPNOTSUPP is more user friendly than to return EINVAL, and then user-space tool will show that the dev_replace operation for raid56 is not currently supported rather than showing that there is an invalid argument. Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-10Btrfs: don't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lockMiao Xie
We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock, or we would make the tasks wait for a long time. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing procedure of the device replaceMiao Xie
During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very easy to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on the devices with the virtio scsi driver). There were two bugs that caused this problem: - We might allocate new chunks on the replaced device after we updated the mapping tree. And we forgot to replace the source device in those mapping of the new chunks. - We might get the mapping information which including the source device before the mapping information update. And then submit the bio which was based on that mapping information after we freed the source device. For the first bug, we can fix it by doing mapping tree update and source device remove in the same context of the chunk mutex. The chunk mutex is used to protect the allocable device list, the above method can avoid the new chunk allocation, and after we remove the source device, all the new chunks will be allocated on the new device. So it can fix the first bug. For the second bug, we need make sure all flighting bios are finished and no new bios are produced during we are removing the source device. To fix this problem, we introduced a global @bio_counter, we not only inc/dec @bio_counter outsize of map_blocks, but also inc it before submitting bio and dec @bio_counter when ending bios. Since Raid56 is a little different and device replace dosen't support raid56 yet, it is not addressed in the patch and I add comments to make sure we will fix it in the future. Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10Btrfs: fix unprotected alloc list insertion during the finishing procedure ↵Miao Xie
of replace the alloc list of the filesystem is protected by ->chunk_mutex, we need get that mutex when we insert the new device into the list. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefixFrank Holton
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros. Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix. Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-11-20btrfs: fix typo in the log messageAnand Jain
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11Btrfs: rename btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodesMiao Xie
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always used at the same place. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11Btrfs: don't wait for the completion of all the ordered extentsMiao Xie
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem, if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11btrfs: remove fs/btrfs/compat.hZach Brown
fs/btrfs/compat.h only contained trivial macro wrappers of drop_nlink() and inc_nlink(). This doesn't belong in mainline. Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11btrfs: use get_seconds() instead of btrfs wrapperZach Brown
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11Btrfs: disallow 'btrfs {balance,replace} cancel' on ro mountsIlya Dryomov
For both balance and replace, cancelling involves changing the on-disk state and committing a transaction, which is not a good thing to do on read-only filesystems. Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-10-05Merge branch 'for-linus' into for-linus-3.12Chris Mason
2013-10-04Btrfs: fix a use-after-free bug in btrfs_dev_replace_finishingIlya Dryomov
free_device rcu callback, scheduled from btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev, can be processed before btrfs_scratch_superblock is called, which would result in a use-after-free on btrfs_device contents. Fix this by zeroing the superblock before the rcu callback is registered. Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-09-22Merge branch 'for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason: "These are mostly bug fixes and a two small performance fixes. The most important of the bunch are Josef's fix for a snapshotting regression and Mark's update to fix compile problems on arm" * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (25 commits) Btrfs: create the uuid tree on remount rw btrfs: change extent-same to copy entire argument struct Btrfs: dir_inode_operations should use btrfs_update_time also btrfs: Add btrfs: prefix to kernel log output btrfs: refuse to remount read-write after abort Btrfs: btrfs_ioctl_default_subvol: Revert back to toplevel subvolume when arg is 0 Btrfs: don't leak transaction in btrfs_sync_file() Btrfs: add the missing mutex unlock in write_all_supers() Btrfs: iput inode on allocation failure Btrfs: remove space_info->reservation_progress Btrfs: kill delay_iput arg to the wait_ordered functions Btrfs: fix worst case calculator for space usage Revert "Btrfs: rework the overcommit logic to be based on the total size" Btrfs: improve replacing nocow extents Btrfs: drop dir i_size when adding new names on replay Btrfs: replay dir_index items before other items Btrfs: check roots last log commit when checking if an inode has been logged Btrfs: actually log directory we are fsync()'ing Btrfs: actually limit the size of delalloc range Btrfs: allocate the free space by the existed max extent size when ENOSPC ...
2013-09-21Btrfs: kill delay_iput arg to the wait_ordered functionsJosef Bacik
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it. However if we have an ordered extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on the inode to start work on the ordered extent. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-12Merge branch 'for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason: "This is against 3.11-rc7, but was pulled and tested against your tree as of yesterday. We do have two small incrementals queued up, but I wanted to get this bunch out the door before I hop on an airplane. This is a fairly large batch of fixes, performance improvements, and cleanups from the usual Btrfs suspects. We've included Stefan Behren's work to index subvolume UUIDs, which is targeted at speeding up send/receive with many subvolumes or snapshots in place. It closes a long standing performance issue that was built in to the disk format. Mark Fasheh's offline dedup work is also here. In this case offline means the FS is mounted and active, but the dedup work is not done inline during file IO. This is a building block where utilities are able to ask the FS to dedup a series of extents. The kernel takes care of verifying the data involved really is the same. Today this involves reading both extents, but we'll continue to evolve the patches" * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (118 commits) Btrfs: optimize key searches in btrfs_search_slot Btrfs: don't use an async starter for most of our workers Btrfs: only update disk_i_size as we remove extents Btrfs: fix deadlock in uuid scan kthread Btrfs: stop refusing the relocation of chunk 0 Btrfs: fix memory leak of uuid_root in free_fs_info btrfs: reuse kbasename helper btrfs: return btrfs error code for dev excl ops err Btrfs: allow partial ordered extent completion Btrfs: convert all bug_ons in free-space-cache.c Btrfs: add support for asserts Btrfs: adjust the fs_devices->missing count on unmount Btrf: cleanup: don't check for root_refs == 0 twice Btrfs: fix for patch "cleanup: don't check the same thing twice" Btrfs: get rid of one BUG() in write_all_supers() Btrfs: allocate prelim_ref with a slab allocater Btrfs: pass gfp_t to __add_prelim_ref() to avoid always using GFP_ATOMIC Btrfs: fix race conditions in BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl Btrfs: fix race between removing a dev and writing sbs Btrfs: remove ourselves from the cluster list under lock ...
2013-09-01Btrfs: Make BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID an unsigned long long constantGeert Uytterhoeven
The internal btrfs device id is a u64, hence make the constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID "unsigned long long" as well, so we no longer need a cast to print it. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01Btrfs: Remove superfluous casts from u64 to unsigned long longGeert Uytterhoeven
u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-07-15PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(): Replace most.Rusty Russell
Sweep of the simple cases. Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2013-06-14Btrfs: introduce per-subvolume ordered extent listMiao Xie
The reason we introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list is the same as the per-subvolume delalloc inode list. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-06-14Btrfs: introduce per-subvolume delalloc inode listMiao Xie
When we create a snapshot, we need flush all delalloc inodes in the fs, just flushing the inodes in the source tree is OK. So we introduce per-subvolume delalloc inode list. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-05-17Btrfs: don't allow device replace on RAID5/RAID6Stefan Behrens
This is not yet supported and causes crashes. One sad user reported that it destroyed his filesystem. One failure is in __btrfs_map_block+0xc1f calling kmalloc(0). 0x5f21f is in __btrfs_map_block (fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4923). 4918 num_stripes = map->num_stripes; 4919 max_errors = nr_parity_stripes(map); 4920 4921 raid_map = kmalloc(sizeof(u64) * num_stripes, 4922 GFP_NOFS); 4923 if (!raid_map) { 4924 ret = -ENOMEM; 4925 goto out; 4926 } 4927 There might be more issues. Until this is really tested, don't allow users to start the procedure on RAID5/RAID6 filesystems. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20Btrfs: check the return value of btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes()Miao Xie
We forget to check the return value of btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes(), fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: add new sources for device replace codeStefan Behrens
This adds a new file to the sources together with the header file and the changes to ioctl.h and ctree.h that are required by the new C source file. Additionally, 4 new functions are added to volume.c that deal with device creation and destruction. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>