asmadeus/linux.git - The linux kernel

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2012-10-09	ext3: ext3_bread usage audit	Carlos Maiolino
	This is the ext3 version of the same patch applied to Ext4, where such goal is to audit the usage of ext3_bread() due a possible misinterpretion of its return value. Focused on directory blocks, a NULL value returned from ext3_bread() means a hole, which cannot exist into a directory inode. It can pass undetected after a fix in an uninitialized error variable. The (now) initialized variable into ext3_getblk() may lead to a zero'ed return value of ext3_bread() to its callers, which can make the caller do not detect the hole in the directory inode. This patch creates a new wrapper function ext3_dir_bread() which checks for holes properly, reports error, and returns EIO in that case. Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2005-10-30	[PATCH] ext3: sparse fixes	Ben Dooks
	Fix warnings from sparse due to un-declared functions that should either have a header file or have been declared static fs/ext2/bitmap.c:14:15: warning: symbol 'ext2_count_free' was not declared. Should it be static? fs/ext2/namei.c:92:15: warning: symbol 'ext2_get_parent' was not declared. Should it be static? fs/ext3/bitmap.c:15:15: warning: symbol 'ext3_count_free' was not declared. Should it be static? fs/ext3/namei.c:1013:15: warning: symbol 'ext3_get_parent' was not declared. Should it be static? fs/ext3/xattr.c:214:1: warning: symbol 'ext3_xattr_block_get' was not declared. Should it be static? fs/ext3/xattr.c:358:1: warning: symbol 'ext3_xattr_block_list' was not declared. Should it be static? fs/ext3/xattr.c:630:1: warning: symbol 'ext3_xattr_block_find' was not declared. Should it be static? fs/ext3/xattr.c:863:1: warning: symbol 'ext3_xattr_ibody_find' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>