| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Shrink the RPC task structure. Instead of storing separate pointers
for task->tk_exit and task->tk_release, put them in a structure.
Also pass the user data pointer as a parameter instead of passing it via
task->tk_calldata. This enables us to nest callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
Ensure that we always initiate flushing of data before we exit
a single-page ->writepage() call.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
Ensure that we use set_page_writeback() in the appropriate places
to help the VM in keeping its page radix_tree in sync.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
Fix some dprintk's so that NLM, NFS client, and RPC client compile
cleanly if CONFIG_SYSCTL is disabled.
Test plan:
Compile kernel with CONFIG_NFS enabled and CONFIG_SYSCTL disabled.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
RFC 3530 states that for OPEN_DOWNGRADE "The share_access and share_deny
bits specified must be exactly equal to the union of the share_access and
share_deny bits specified for some subset of the OPENs in effect for
current openowner on the current file.
Setattr is currently violating the NFSv4 rules for OPEN_DOWNGRADE in that
it may cause a downgrade from OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH to
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE despite the fact that there exists no open file
with O_WRONLY access mode.
Fix the problem by replacing nfs4_find_state() with a modified version of
nfs_find_open_context().
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
efficient.
Basically copies the VFS's method for tracking writebacks and applies
it to the struct nfs_page.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
Use stable writes if we can see that we are only going to put a single
write on the wire.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
Instead of looking at whether or not the file is open for writes before
we accept to update the length using the server value, we should rather
be looking at whether or not we are currently caching any writes.
Failure to do so means in particular that we're not updating the file
length correctly after obtaining a POSIX or BSD lock.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
