summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2010-02-14proc_devtree: fix THIS_MODULE without module.hJeremy Kerr
Commit e22f628395432b967f2f505858c64450f7835365 introduced a build breakage for ARM devtree work: the THIS_MODULE macro was added, but we don't have module.h This change adds the necessary #include to get THIS_MODULE defined. While we could just replace it with NULL (PROC_FS is a bool, not a tristate), using THIS_MODULE will prevent unexpected breakage if we ever do compile this as a module. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
2010-02-09proc_devtree: include linux/of.hJeremy Kerr
Currenly, proc_devtree.c depends on asm/prom.h to include linux/of.h, to provide some device-tree definitions (eg, struct property). Instead, include linux/of.h directly. We still need asm/prom.h for HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
2010-02-09of: make set_node_proc_entry private to proc_devtree.cJeremy Kerr
We only need set_node_proc_entry in proc_devtree.c, so move it there. This fixes the !HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS build, as we can't make make the definition in linux/of.h conditional on this #define (definitions in asm/prom.h can't be exposed to linux/of.h, due to the enforced #include ordering). Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
2009-10-30Convert /proc/device-tree/ to seq_fileAlexey Dobriyan
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2009-06-18procfs: remove sparse errors in proc_devtree.cMichal Simek
CHECK fs/proc/proc_devtree.c fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:197:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:203:34: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:210:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:223:26: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:226:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-06-11Move junk from proc_fs.h to fs/proc/internal.hAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2008-12-16powerpc: Remove `have_of' global variableAnton Vorontsov
The `have_of' variable is a relic from the arch/ppc time, it isn't useful nowadays. Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2008-10-23proc: spread __initAlexey Dobriyan
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
2007-04-13[POWERPC] Make struct property's value a void *Stephen Rothwell
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-03-28[PATCH] powerpc: Cope with duplicate node & property names in /proc/device-treeMichael Ellerman
Various dodgy firmware might give us nodes and/or properties in the device tree with conflicting names. That's generally ok, except for when we export the device tree via /proc, so check when we're creating the proc device tree and munge names accordingly. Tested on a faked device tree with kexec, would be good if someone with actual bogus firmware could try it, but just for completeness. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-03-26[PATCH] protect remove_proc_entrySteven Rostedt
It has been discovered that the remove_proc_entry has a race in the removing of entries in the proc file system that are siblings. There's no protection around the traversing and removing of elements that belong in the same subdirectory. This subdirectory list is protected in other areas by the BKL. So the BKL was at first used to protect this area too, but unfortunately, remove_proc_entry may be called with spinlocks held. The BKL may schedule, so this was not a solution. The final solution was to add a new global spin lock to protect this list, called proc_subdir_lock. This lock now protects the list in remove_proc_entry, and I also went around looking for other areas that this list is modified and added this protection there too. Care must be taken since these locations call several functions that may also schedule. Since I don't see any location that these functions that modify the subdirectory list are called by interrupts, the irqsave/restore versions of the spin lock was _not_ used. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-13[PATCH] powerpc: Add/remove/update properties in /proc/device-treeDave C Boutcher
Add support to the proc_device_tree file for removing and updating properties. Remove just removes the proc file, update changes the data pointer within the proc file. The remainder of the device-tree changes occur elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Dave Boutcher <sleddog@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-11-08[PATCH] ppc64: SMU partition recoveryBenjamin Herrenschmidt
This patch adds the ability to the SMU driver to recover missing calibration partitions from the SMU chip itself. It also adds some dynamic mecanism to /proc/device-tree so that new properties are visible to userland. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-06-01[PATCH] ppc32/ppc64: cleanup /proc/device-treeBenjamin Herrenschmidt
This cleans up the /proc/device-tree representation of the Open Firmware device-tree on ppc and ppc64. It does the following things: - Workaround an issue in some Apple device-trees where a property may exist with the same name as a child node of the parent. We now simply "drop" the property instead of creating duplicate entries in /proc with random result... - Do not try to chop off the "@0" at the end of a node name whose unit address is 0. This is not useful, inconsistent, and the code was buggy and didn't always work anyway. - Do not create symlinks for the short name and unit address parts of a node. These were never really used, bloated the memory footprint of the device-tree with useless struct proc_dir_entry and their matching dentry and inode cache bloat. This results in smaller code, smaller memory footprint, and a more accurate view of the tree presented to userland. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!