| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There's no need to call the runlatch on functions on processors that
don't implement them (CPU_FTR_CTRL).
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
|
|
It makes head_64.S a bit more readable and will allow us to move the
iSeries exceptions elsewhere.
This also removes the last line of the comment:
* The following macros define the code that appears as
* the prologue to each of the exception handlers. They
* are split into two parts to allow a single kernel binary
* to be used for pSeries and iSeries.
* LOL. One day... - paulus
Anything is possible. :-)
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
|
