| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
1) sun4{u,v}_build_msi() have improper return value handling.
We should always return negative error codes, instead of
using the magic value "0" which could in fact be a valid
MSI number.
2) sun4{u,v}_build_msi() should return -ENOMEM instead of
calling prom_prom() halt with kzalloc() of the interrupt
data fails.
3) We 'remembered' the MSI number using a singleton in the
struct device archdata area, this doesn't work for MSI-X
which can cause multiple MSIs assosciated with one device.
Delete that archdata member, and instead store the MSI
number in the IRQ chip data area.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Almost entirely taken from the 64-bit PowerPC PCI code.
This allowed to eliminate a ton of cruft from the sparc64
PCI layer.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Add arch specific dev_archdata to struct device
Adds an arch specific struct dev_arch to struct device. This enables
architecture to add specific fields to every device in the system, like
DMA operation pointers, NUMA node ID, firmware specific data, etc...
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
