summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/sched_rt.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-10-04sched_rt.c: resch needed in rt_rq_enqueue() for the root rt_rqDario Faggioli
While working on the new version of the code for SCHED_SPORADIC I noticed something strange in the present throttling mechanism. More specifically in the throttling timer handler in sched_rt.c (do_sched_rt_period_timer()) and in rt_rq_enqueue(). The problem is that, when unthrottling a runqueue, rt_rq_enqueue() only asks for rescheduling if the runqueue has a sched_entity associated to it (i.e., rt_rq->rt_se != NULL). Now, if the runqueue is the root rq (which has a rt_se = NULL) rescheduling does not take place, and it is delayed to some undefined instant in the future. This imply some random bandwidth usage by the RT tasks under throttling. For instance, setting rt_runtime_us/rt_period_us = 950ms/1000ms an RT task will get less than 95%. In our tests we got something varying between 70% to 95%. Using smaller time values, e.g., 95ms/100ms, things are even worse, and I can see values also going down to 20-25%!! The tests we performed are simply running 'yes' as a SCHED_FIFO task, and checking the CPU usage with top, but we can investigate thoroughly if you think it is needed. Things go much better, for us, with the attached patch... Don't know if it is the best approach, but it solved the issue for us. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-23sched: add some comments to the bandwidth codePeter Zijlstra
Hopefully clarify some of this code a little. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-23Merge branches 'sched/urgent' and 'sched/rt' into sched/develIngo Molnar
2008-09-22sched: wakeup preempt when small overlapPeter Zijlstra
Lin Ming reported a 10% OLTP regression against 2.6.27-rc4. The difference seems to come from different preemption agressiveness, which affects the cache footprint of the workload and its effective cache trashing. Aggresively preempt a task if its avg overlap is very small, this should avoid the task going to sleep and find it still running when we schedule back to it - saving a wakeup. Reported-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-11sched: fix 2.6.27-rc5 couldn't boot on tulsa machine randomlyZhang, Yanmin
On my tulsa x86-64 machine, kernel 2.6.25-rc5 couldn't boot randomly. Basically, function __enable_runtime forgets to reset rt_rq->rt_throttled to 0. When every cpu is up, per-cpu migration_thread is created and it runs very fast, sometimes to mark the corresponding rt_rq->rt_throttled to 1 very quickly. After all cpus are up, with below calling chain: sched_init_smp => arch_init_sched_domains => build_sched_domains => ... => cpu_attach_domain => rq_attach_root => set_rq_online => ... => _enable_runtime _enable_runtime is called against every rt_rq again, so rt_rq->rt_time is reset to 0, but rt_rq->rt_throttled might be still 1. Later on function do_sched_rt_period_timer couldn't reset it, and all RT tasks couldn't be scheduled to run on that cpu. here is RT task migration_thread which is woken up when a task is migrated to another cpu. Below patch fixes it against 2.6.27-rc5. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-28sched: rt-bandwidth accounting fixPeter Zijlstra
It fixes an accounting bug where we would continue accumulating runtime even though the bandwidth control is disabled. This would lead to very long throttle periods once bandwidth control gets turned on again. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-28sched: fix sched_rt_rq_enqueue() resched idleJohn Blackwood
When sysctl_sched_rt_runtime is set to something other than -1 and the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED kernel parameter is NOT enabled, we get into a state where we see one or more CPUs idling forvever even though there are real-time tasks in their rt runqueue that are able to run (no longer throttled). The sequence is: - A real-time task is running when the timer sets the rt runqueue to throttled, and the rt task is resched_task()ed and switched out, and idle is switched in since there are no non-rt tasks to run on that cpu. - Eventually the do_sched_rt_period_timer() runs and un-throttles the rt runqueue, but we just exit the timer interrupt and go back to executing the idle task in the idle loop forever. If we change the sched_rt_rq_enqueue() routine to use some of the code from the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED enabled version of this same routine and resched_task() the currently executing task (idle in our case) if it is a lower priority task than the higher rt task in the now un-throttled runqueue, the problem is no longer observed. Signed-off-by: John Blackwood <john.blackwood@ccur.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-19sched: rt-bandwidth group disable fixesPeter Zijlstra
More extensive disable of bandwidth control. It allows sysctl_sched_rt_runtime to disable full group bandwidth control. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-19sched: rt-bandwidth accounting fixPeter Zijlstra
It fixes an accounting bug where we would continue accumulating runtime even though the bandwidth control is disabled. This would lead to very long throttle periods once bandwidth control gets turned on again. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-14sched: fix rt-bandwidth hotplug racePeter Zijlstra
When we hot-unplug a cpu and rebuild the sched-domain, all cpus will be detatched. Alex observed the case where a runqueue was stealing bandwidth from an already disabled runqueue to satisfy its own needs. Stop this by skipping over already disabled runqueues. Reported-by: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Tested-by: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-11lockdep: re-annotate scheduler runqueuesPeter Zijlstra
Instead of using a per-rq lock class, use the regular nesting operations. However, take extra care with double_lock_balance() as it can release the already held rq->lock (and therefore change its nesting class). So what can happen is: spin_lock(rq->lock); // this rq subclass 0 double_lock_balance(rq, other_rq); // release rq // acquire other_rq->lock subclass 0 // acquire rq->lock subclass 1 spin_unlock(other_rq->lock); leaving you with rq->lock in subclass 1 So a subsequent double_lock_balance() call can try to nest a subclass 1 lock while already holding a subclass 1 lock. Fix this by introducing double_unlock_balance() which releases the other rq's lock, but also re-sets the subclass for this rq's lock to 0. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-24Merge branch 'sched-fixes-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip * 'sched-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: sched: clean up compiler warning sched: fix hrtick & generic-ipi dependency
2008-07-24sched: clean up compiler warningPeter Zijlstra
Reported-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-23Merge branch 'sched/for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip * 'sched/for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: sched: hrtick_enabled() should use cpu_active() sched, x86: clean up hrtick implementation sched: fix build error, provide partition_sched_domains() unconditionally sched: fix warning in inc_rt_tasks() to not declare variable 'rq' if it's not needed cpu hotplug: Make cpu_active_map synchronization dependency clear cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce cpu_active_map and redo sched domain managment (take 2) sched: rework of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones" sched: reduce stack size in isolated_cpu_setup() Revert parts of "ftrace: do not trace scheduler functions" Fixed up conflicts in include/asm-x86/thread_info.h (due to the TIF_SINGLESTEP unification vs TIF_HRTICK_RESCHED removal) and kernel/sched_fair.c (due to cpu_active_map vs for_each_cpu_mask_nr() introduction).
2008-07-20Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/develIngo Molnar
2008-07-18sched: fix warning in inc_rt_tasks() to not declare variable 'rq' if it's ↵David Howells
not needed Fix inc_rt_tasks() to not declare variable 'rq' if it's not needed. It is declared if CONFIG_SMP or CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED, but only used if CONFIG_SMP. This is a consequence of patch 1f11eb6a8bc92536d9e93ead48fa3ffbd1478571 plus patch 1100ac91b6af02d8639d518fad5b434b1bf44ed6. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-18cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce cpu_active_map and redo sched domain managment ↵Max Krasnyansky
(take 2) This is based on Linus' idea of creating cpu_active_map that prevents scheduler load balancer from migrating tasks to the cpu that is going down. It allows us to simplify domain management code and avoid unecessary domain rebuilds during cpu hotplug event handling. Please ignore the cpusets part for now. It needs some more work in order to avoid crazy lock nesting. Although I did simplfy and unify domain reinitialization logic. We now simply call partition_sched_domains() in all the cases. This means that we're using exact same code paths as in cpusets case and hence the test below cover cpusets too. Cpuset changes to make rebuild_sched_domains() callable from various contexts are in the separate patch (right next after this one). This not only boots but also easily handles while true; do make clean; make -j 8; done and while true; do on-off-cpu 1; done at the same time. (on-off-cpu 1 simple does echo 0/1 > /sys/.../cpu1/online thing). Suprisingly the box (dual-core Core2) is quite usable. In fact I'm typing this on right now in gnome-terminal and things are moving just fine. Also this is running with most of the debug features enabled (lockdep, mutex, etc) no BUG_ONs or lockdep complaints so far. I believe I addressed all of the Dmitry's comments for original Linus' version. I changed both fair and rt balancer to mask out non-active cpus. And replaced cpu_is_offline() with !cpu_active() in the main scheduler code where it made sense (to me). Signed-off-by: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@qualcomm.com> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Cc: dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com Cc: pj@sgi.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-18sched: rework of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones"Dmitry Adamushko
(1) handle in a generic way all cases when a newly woken-up task is not migratable (not just a corner case when "rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed == 1") (2) if current is to be preempted, then make sure "p" will be picked up by pick_next_task_rt(). i.e. move task's group at the head of its list as well. currently, it's not a case for the group-scheduling case as described here: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0807.0/0134.html Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-16Merge branch 'linus' into cpus4096Ingo Molnar
Conflicts: arch/x86/xen/smp.c kernel/sched_rt.c net/iucv/iucv.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-06Merge commit 'v2.6.26-rc9' into cpus4096Ingo Molnar
2008-06-27sched: make sched_{rt,fair}.c ifdefs more readableDhaval Giani
Signed-off-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: revert revert of: fair-group: SMP-nice for group schedulingPeter Zijlstra
Try again.. Initial commit: 18d95a2832c1392a2d63227a7a6d433cb9f2037e Revert: 6363ca57c76b7b83639ca8c83fc285fa26a7880e Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: clean up some unused variablesPeter Zijlstra
In file included from /mnt/build/linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c:1496: /mnt/build/linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c: In function '__enable_runtime': /mnt/build/linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c:339: warning: unused variable 'rd' /mnt/build/linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c: In function 'requeue_rt_entity': /mnt/build/linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c:692: warning: unused variable 'queue' Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-20sched: rt: dont stop the period timer when there are tasks wanting to runPeter Zijlstra
So if the group ever gets throttled, it will never wake up again. Reported-by: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Tested-by: Daniel K. <dk@uw.no> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-20sched: rt: dont stop the period timer when there are tasks wanting to runPeter Zijlstra
So if the group ever gets throttled, it will never wake up again. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Reported-by: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no>
2008-06-20sched: rt: move some code aroundPeter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-20sched: rt: fix SMP bandwidth balancing for throttled groupsPeter Zijlstra
Now we exceed the runtime and get throttled - the period rollover tick will subtract the cpu quota from the runtime and check if we're below quota. However with this cpu having a very small portion of the runtime it will not refresh as fast as it should. Therefore, also rebalance the runtime when we're throttled. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-20sched: debug: add some rt debug outputPeter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-19Merge branch 'sched' into sched-develIngo Molnar
Conflicts: kernel/sched_rt.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-19sched: rt-group: fix RR bugletPeter Zijlstra
In tick_task_rt() we first call update_curr_rt() which can dequeue a runqueue due to it running out of runtime, and then we try to requeue it, of it also having exhausted its RR quota. Obviously requeueing something that is no longer on the runqueue will not have the expected result. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Tested-by: Daniel K. <dk@uw.no> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-19sched: rt-group: heirarchy aware throttlePeter Zijlstra
The bandwidth throttle code dequeues a group when it runs out of quota, and re-queues it once the period rolls over and the quota gets refreshed. Sadly it failed to take the hierarchy into consideration. Share more of the enqueue/dequeue code with regular task opterations. Also, some operations like sched_setscheduler() can dequeue/enqueue tasks that are in throttled runqueues, we should not inadvertly re-enqueue empty runqueues so check for that. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Tested-by: Daniel K. <dk@uw.no> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-18sched: rework of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones"Dmitry Adamushko
regarding this commit: 45c01e824991b2dd0a332e19efc4901acb31209f I think we can do it simpler. Please take a look at the patch below. Instead of having 2 separate arrays (which is + ~800 bytes on x86_32 and twice so on x86_64), let's add "exclusive" (the ones that are bound to this CPU) tasks to the head of the queue and "shared" ones -- to the end. In case of a few newly woken up "exclusive" tasks, they are 'stacked' (not queued as now), meaning that a task {i+1} is being placed in front of the previously woken up task {i}. But I don't think that this behavior may cause any realistic problems. There are a couple of changes on top of this one. (1) in check_preempt_curr_rt() I don't think there is a need for the "pick_next_rt_entity(rq, &rq->rt) != &rq->curr->rt" check. enqueue_task_rt(p) and check_preempt_curr_rt() are always called one after another with rq->lock being held so the following check "p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1 && rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed != 1" should be enough (well, just its left part) to guarantee that 'p' has been queued in front of the 'curr'. (2) in set_cpus_allowed_rt() I don't thinks there is a need for requeue_task_rt() here. Perhaps, the only case when 'requeue' (+ reschedule) might be useful is as follows: i) weight == 1 && cpu_isset(task_cpu(p), *new_mask) i.e. a task is being bound to this CPU); ii) 'p' != rq->curr but here, 'p' has already been on this CPU for a while and was not migrated. i.e. it's possible that 'rq->curr' would not have high chances to be migrated right at this particular moment (although, has chance in a bit longer term), should we allow it to be preempted. Anyway, I think we should not perhaps make it more complex trying to address some rare corner cases. For instance, that's why a single queue approach would be preferable. Unless I'm missing something obvious, this approach gives us similar functionality at lower cost. Verified only compilation-wise. (Almost)-Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-10sched: fix hotplug cpus on ia64Peter Zijlstra
Cliff Wickman wrote: > I built an ia64 kernel from Andrew's tree (2.6.26-rc2-mm1) > and get a very predictable hotplug cpu problem. > billberry1:/tmp/cpw # ./dis > disabled cpu 17 > enabled cpu 17 > billberry1:/tmp/cpw # ./dis > disabled cpu 17 > enabled cpu 17 > billberry1:/tmp/cpw # ./dis > > The script that disables the cpu always hangs (unkillable) > on the 3rd attempt. > > And a bit further: > The kstopmachine thread always sits on the run queue (real time) for about > 30 minutes before running. this fix solves some (but not all) issues between CPU hotplug and RT bandwidth throttling. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-06sched: fix cpuprio build bugIngo Molnar
this patch was not built on !SMP: kernel/sched_rt.c: In function 'inc_rt_tasks': kernel/sched_rt.c:404: error: 'struct rq' has no member named 'online' Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-06sched: fix cpupri hotplug supportGregory Haskins
The RT folks over at RedHat found an issue w.r.t. hotplug support which was traced to problems with the cpupri infrastructure in the scheduler: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449676 This bug affects 23-rt12+, 24-rtX, 25-rtX, and sched-devel. This patch applies to 25.4-rt4, though it should trivially apply to most cpupri enabled kernels mentioned above. It turned out that the issue was that offline cpus could get inadvertently registered with cpupri so that they were erroneously selected during migration decisions. The end result would be an OOPS as the offline cpu had tasks routed to it. This patch generalizes the old join/leave domain interface into an online/offline interface, and adjusts the root-domain/hotplug code to utilize it. I was able to easily reproduce the issue prior to this patch, and am no longer able to reproduce it after this patch. I can offline cpus indefinately and everything seems to be in working order. Thanks to Arnaldo (acme), Thomas, and Peter for doing the legwork to point me in the right direction. Also thank you to Peter for reviewing the early iterations of this patch. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-06-06sched: use a 2-d bitmap for searching lowest-pri CPUGregory Haskins
The current code use a linear algorithm which causes scaling issues on larger SMP machines. This patch replaces that algorithm with a 2-dimensional bitmap to reduce latencies in the wake-up path. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-06-06sched: prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable onesGregory Haskins
Dmitry Adamushko pointed out a known flaw in the rt-balancing algorithm that could allow suboptimal balancing if a non-migratable task gets queued behind a running migratable one. It is discussed in this thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/296 This issue has been further exacerbated by a recent checkin to sched-devel (git-id 5eee63a5ebc19a870ac40055c0be49457f3a89a3). >From a pure priority standpoint, the run-queue is doing the "right" thing. Using Dmitry's nomenclature, if T0 is on cpu1 first, and T1 wakes up at equal or lower priority (affined only to cpu1) later, it *should* wait for T0 to finish. However, in reality that is likely suboptimal from a system perspective if there are other cores that could allow T0 and T1 to run concurrently. Since T1 can not migrate, the only choice for higher concurrency is to try to move T0. This is not something we addessed in the recent rt-balancing re-work. This patch tries to enhance the balancing algorithm by accomodating this scenario. It accomplishes this by incorporating the migratability of a task into its priority calculation. Within a numerical tsk->prio, a non-migratable task is logically higher than a migratable one. We maintain this by introducing a new per-priority queue (xqueue, or exclusive-queue) for holding non-migratable tasks. The scheduler will draw from the xqueue over the standard shared-queue (squeue) when available. There are several details for utilizing this properly. 1) During task-wake-up, we not only need to check if the priority preempts the current task, but we also need to check for this non-migratable condition. Therefore, if a non-migratable task wakes up and sees an equal priority migratable task already running, it will attempt to preempt it *if* there is a likelyhood that the current task will find an immediate home. 2) Tasks only get this non-migratable "priority boost" on wake-up. Any requeuing will result in the non-migratable task being queued to the end of the shared queue. This is an attempt to prevent the system from being completely unfair to migratable tasks during things like SCHED_RR timeslicing. I am sure this patch introduces potentially "odd" behavior if you concoct a scenario where a bunch of non-migratable threads could starve migratable ones given the right pattern. I am not yet convinced that this is a problem since we are talking about tasks of equal RT priority anyway, and there never is much in the way of guarantees against starvation under that scenario anyway. (e.g. you could come up with a similar scenario with a specific timing environment verses an affinity environment). I can be convinced otherwise, but for now I think this is "ok". Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> CC: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-05-29revert ("sched: fair-group: SMP-nice for group scheduling")Ingo Molnar
Yanmin Zhang reported: Comparing with 2.6.25, volanoMark has big regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1. It's about 50% on my 8-core stoakley, 16-core tigerton, and Itanium Montecito. With bisect, I located the following patch: | 18d95a2832c1392a2d63227a7a6d433cb9f2037e is first bad commit | commit 18d95a2832c1392a2d63227a7a6d433cb9f2037e | Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> | Date: Sat Apr 19 19:45:00 2008 +0200 | | sched: fair-group: SMP-nice for group scheduling Revert it so that we get v2.6.25 behavior. Bisected-by: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-05-23core: use performance variant for_each_cpu_mask_nrMike Travis
Change references from for_each_cpu_mask to for_each_cpu_mask_nr where appropriate Reviewed-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-05-05sched: fix RT task-wakeup logicGregory Haskins
Dmitry Adamushko pointed out a logic error in task_wake_up_rt() where we will always evaluate to "true". You can find the thread here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/296 In reality, we only want to try to push tasks away when a wake up request is not going to preempt the current task. So lets fix it. Note: We introduce test_tsk_need_resched() instead of open-coding the flag check so that the merge-conflict with -rt should help remind us that we may need to support NEEDS_RESCHED_DELAYED in the future, too. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> CC: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-05-05sched: make rt_sched_class, idle_sched_class staticHarvey Harrison
The C files are included directly in sched.c, so they are effectively static. Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-19sched: rt-group: optimize dequeue_rt_stackPeter Zijlstra
Now that the group hierarchy can have an arbitrary depth the O(n^2) nature of RT task dequeues will really hurt. Optimize this by providing space to store the tree path, so we can walk it the other way. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-19sched: fair-group: SMP-nice for group schedulingPeter Zijlstra
Implement SMP nice support for the full group hierarchy. On each load-balance action, compile a sched_domain wide view of the full task_group tree. We compute the domain wide view when walking down the hierarchy, and readjust the weights when walking back up. After collecting and readjusting the domain wide view, we try to balance the tasks within the task_groups. The current approach is a naively balance each task group until we've moved the targeted amount of load. Inspired by Srivatsa Vaddsgiri's previous code and Abhishek Chandra's H-SMP paper. XXX: there will be some numerical issues due to the limited nature of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE wrt to representing a task_groups influence on the total weight. When the tree is deep enough, or the task weight small enough, we'll run out of bits. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> CC: Abhishek Chandra <chandra@cs.umn.edu> CC: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-19sched: mix tasks and groupsDhaval Giani
This patch allows tasks and groups to exist in the same cfs_rq. With this change the CFS group scheduling follows a 1/(M+N) model from a 1/(1+N) fairness model where M tasks and N groups exist at the cfs_rq level. [a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl: rt bits and assorted fixes] Signed-off-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-19sched: add new set_cpus_allowed_ptr functionMike Travis
Add a new function that accepts a pointer to the "newly allowed cpus" cpumask argument. int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const cpumask_t *new_mask) The current set_cpus_allowed() function is modified to use the above but this does not result in an ABI change. And with some compiler optimization help, it may not introduce any additional overhead. Additionally, to enforce the read only nature of the new_mask arg, the "const" property is migrated to sub-functions called by set_cpus_allowed. This silences compiler warnings. Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-19sched: rt-group: smp balancingPeter Zijlstra
Currently the rt group scheduling does a per cpu runtime limit, however the rt load balancer makes no guarantees about an equal spread of real- time tasks, just that at any one time, the highest priority tasks run. Solve this by making the runtime limit a global property by borrowing excessive runtime from the other cpus once the local limit runs out. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-19sched: rt-group: synchonised bandwidth periodPeter Zijlstra
Various SMP balancing algorithms require that the bandwidth period run in sync. Possible improvements are moving the rt_bandwidth thing into root_domain and keeping a span per rt_bandwidth which marks throttled cpus. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-07sched: balance RT task resched only on runqueueSteven Rostedt
Sripathi Kodi reported a crash in the -rt kernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435674 this is due to a place that can reschedule a task without holding the tasks runqueue lock. This was caused by the RT balancing code that pulls RT tasks to the current run queue and will reschedule the current task. There's a slight chance that the pulling of the RT tasks will release the current runqueue's lock and retake it (in the double_lock_balance). During this time that the runqueue is released, the current task can migrate to another runqueue. In the prio_changed_rt code, after the pull, if the current task is of lesser priority than one of the RT tasks pulled, resched_task is called on the current task. If the current task had migrated in that small window, resched_task will be called without holding the runqueue lock for the runqueue that the task is on. This race condition also exists in the mainline kernel and this patch adds a check to make sure the task hasn't migrated before calling resched_task. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Tested-by: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@in.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-04sched: revert load_balance_monitor() changesPeter Zijlstra
The following commits cause a number of regressions: commit 58e2d4ca581167c2a079f4ee02be2f0bc52e8729 Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100 sched: group scheduling, change how cpu load is calculated commit 6b2d7700266b9402e12824e11e0099ae6a4a6a79 Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100 sched: group scheduler, fix fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups Namely: - very frequent wakeups on SMP, reported by PowerTop users. - cacheline trashing on (large) SMP - some latencies larger than 500ms While there is a mergeable patch to fix the latter, the former issues are not fixable in a manner suitable for .25 (we're at -rc3 now). Hence we revert them and try again in v2.6.26. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> CC: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-02-13sched: rt-group: make rt groups scheduling configurablePeter Zijlstra
Make the rt group scheduler compile time configurable. Keep it experimental for now. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>