| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The number of locks used to manage afinfo structures can easily be reduced
down to one each for policy and state respectively. This is based on the
observation that the write locks are only held by module insertion/removal
which are very rare events so there is no need to further differentiate
between the insertion of modules like ipv6 versus esp6.
The removal of the read locks in xfrm4_policy.c/xfrm6_policy.c might look
suspicious at first. However, after you realise that nobody ever takes
the corresponding write lock you'll feel better :)
As far as I can gather it's an attempt to guard against the removal of
the corresponding modules. Since neither module can be unloaded at all
we can leave it to whoever fixes up IPv6 unloading :)
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
When the source address of a tunnel is given as 0.0.0.0 do a routing lookup
to get the real source address for the destination and fill that into the
acquire message. This allows to specify policies like this:
spdadd 172.16.128.13/32 172.16.0.0/20 any -P out ipsec
esp/tunnel/0.0.0.0-x.x.x.x/require;
spdadd 172.16.0.0/20 172.16.128.13/32 any -P in ipsec
esp/tunnel/x.x.x.x-0.0.0.0/require;
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
