summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/rose/rose_route.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-03-28Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.hDavid Howells
Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.h preparatory to splitting and killing it. Performed with the following command: perl -p -i -e 's!^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>.*\n!!' `grep -Irl '^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>' *` Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2011-10-31net: Add export.h for EXPORT_SYMBOL/THIS_MODULE to non-modulesPaul Gortmaker
These files are non modular, but need to export symbols using the macros now living in export.h -- call out the include so that things won't break when we remove the implicit presence of module.h from everywhere. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2011-07-07rose: Delete commented out references to ancient firewalling code.David S. Miller
These intefaces haven't existed since 2.2.x Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-03-31Fix common misspellingsLucas De Marchi
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
2011-03-27rose: Add length checks to CALL_REQUEST parsingBen Hutchings
Define some constant offsets for CALL_REQUEST based on the description at <http://www.techfest.com/networking/wan/x25plp.htm> and the definition of ROSE as using 10-digit (5-byte) addresses. Use them consistently. Validate all implicit and explicit facilities lengths. Validate the address length byte rather than either trusting or assuming its value. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-02-14ROSE: rose AX25 packet routing improvementBernard Pidoux
FPAC AX25 packet application is using Linux kernel ROSE routing skills in order to connect or send packets to remote stations knowing their ROSE address via a network of interconnected nodes. Each FPAC node has a ROSE routing table that Linux ROSE module is looking at each time a ROSE frame is relayed by the node or when a connect request to a neighbor node is received. A previous patch improved the system time response by looking at already established routes each time the system was looking for a route to relay a frame. If a neighbor node routing the destination address was already connected, then the frame would be sent through him. If not, a connection request would be issued. The present patch extends the same routing capability to a connect request asked by a user locally connected into an FPAC node. Without this patch, a connect request was not well handled unless it was directed to an immediate connected neighbor of the local node. Implemented at a number of ROSE FPAC node stations, the present patch improved dramatically FPAC ROSE routing time response and efficiency. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-08-01net/rose: Use GFP_ATOMICJulia Lawall
The other calls to kmalloc in the same function use GFP_ATOMIC, and indeed two locks are held within the body of the function. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ identifier f; @@ *f(...,GFP_ATOMIC,...) ... when != spin_unlock(...) when != read_unlock(...) when != write_unlock(...) when != read_unlock_irq(...) when != write_unlock_irq(...) when != read_unlock_irqrestore(...) when != write_unlock_irqrestore(...) when != spin_unlock_irq(...) when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(...) *f(...,GFP_KERNEL,...) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-03-30include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking ↵Tejun Heo
implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-01-16ax25: netrom: rose: Fix timer oopsesJarek Poplawski
Wrong ax25_cb refcounting in ax25_send_frame() and by its callers can cause timer oopses (first reported with 2.6.29.6 kernel). Fixes: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14905 Reported-by: Bernard Pidoux <bpidoux@free.fr> Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux <bpidoux@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-11-29net: Move && and || to end of previous lineJoe Perches
Not including net/atm/ Compiled tested x86 allyesconfig only Added a > 80 column line or two, which I ignored. Existing checkpatch plaints willfully, cheerfully ignored. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-11-06Merge branch 'master' of ↵David S. Miller
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6 Conflicts: drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c All CDC ethernet devices of type USB_CLASS_COMM need to use '&mbm_info'. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-11-05rose: device refcount leakEric Dumazet
While hunting dev_put() for net-next-2.6, I found a device refcount leak in ROSE, ioctl(SIOCADDRT) error path. Fix is to not touch device refcount, as we hold RTNL Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-11-04net: Introduce for_each_netdev_rcu() iteratorEric Dumazet
Adds RCU management to the list of netdevices. Convert some for_each_netdev() users to RCU version, if it can avoid read_lock-ing dev_base_lock Ie: read_lock(&dev_base_loack); for_each_netdev(net, dev) some_action(); read_unlock(&dev_base_lock); becomes : rcu_read_lock(); for_each_netdev_rcu(net, dev) some_action(); rcu_read_unlock(); Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-07-26NET: ROSE: Don't use static buffer.Ralf Baechle
The use of a static buffer in rose2asc() to return its result is not threadproof and can result in corruption if multiple threads are trying to use one of the procfs files based on rose2asc(). Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-06-17rose: improving AX25 routing frames via ROSE networkBernard Pidoux
ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet. AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed through these nodes. Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally due to an improper parameter checking. rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by rose_route_frame(). In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise. When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame through an adjacent node given a destination rose address. However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected. The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by rose route_frame(). This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted". If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour node already connected. If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL. In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before. This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-05-02rose: Wrong list_lock argument in rose_node seqopsBernard Pidoux
In rose_node_start() as well as in rose_node_stop() __acquires() and spin_lock_bh() were wrongly passing rose_neigh_list_lock instead of rose_node_list_lock arguments. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-04-20[ROSE]: Fix soft lockup wrt. rose_node_list_lockBernard Pidoux
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.25 #3 --------------------------------------------- ax25ipd/3811 is trying to acquire lock: (rose_node_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d31f1a>] rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] but task is already holding lock: (rose_node_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d31fed>] rose_route_frame+0x4d/0x620 [rose] other info that might help us debug this: 6 locks held by ax25ipd/3811: #0: (&tty->atomic_write_lock){--..}, at: [<c0259a1c>] tty_write_lock+0x1c/0x50 #1: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c02aea36>] net_rx_action+0x96/0x230 #2: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c02ac5c0>] netif_receive_skb+0x100/0x2f0 #3: (rose_node_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d31fed>] rose_route_frame+0x4d/0x620 [rose] #4: (rose_neigh_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d31ff7>] rose_route_frame+0x57/0x620 [rose] #5: (rose_route_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d32001>] rose_route_frame+0x61/0x620 [rose] stack backtrace: Pid: 3811, comm: ax25ipd Not tainted 2.6.25 #3 [<c0147e27>] print_deadlock_bug+0xc7/0xd0 [<c0147eca>] check_deadlock+0x9a/0xb0 [<c0149cd2>] validate_chain+0x1e2/0x310 [<c0149b95>] ? validate_chain+0xa5/0x310 [<c010a7d8>] ? native_sched_clock+0x88/0xc0 [<c0149fa1>] __lock_acquire+0x1a1/0x750 [<c014a5d1>] lock_acquire+0x81/0xa0 [<f8d31f1a>] ? rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<c03201a3>] _spin_lock_bh+0x33/0x60 [<f8d31f1a>] ? rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<f8d31f1a>] rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<f8d32404>] rose_route_frame+0x464/0x620 [rose] [<c031ffdd>] ? _read_unlock+0x1d/0x20 [<f8d31fa0>] ? rose_route_frame+0x0/0x620 [rose] [<f8d1c396>] ax25_rx_iframe+0x66/0x3b0 [ax25] [<f8d1f42f>] ? ax25_start_t3timer+0x1f/0x40 [ax25] [<f8d1e65b>] ax25_std_frame_in+0x7fb/0x890 [ax25] [<c0320005>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x25/0x30 [<f8d1bdf6>] ax25_kiss_rcv+0x2c6/0x800 [ax25] [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c014a8a7>] ? __lock_release+0x47/0x70 [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c031ffdd>] ? _read_unlock+0x1d/0x20 [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c02a4d3a>] ? sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x13a/0x1d0 [<c02a4c45>] ? sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x45/0x1d0 [<f8d1bb30>] ? ax25_kiss_rcv+0x0/0x800 [ax25] [<c02ac715>] netif_receive_skb+0x255/0x2f0 [<c02ac5c0>] ? netif_receive_skb+0x100/0x2f0 [<c02af05c>] process_backlog+0x7c/0xf0 [<c02aeb0c>] net_rx_action+0x16c/0x230 [<c02aea36>] ? net_rx_action+0x96/0x230 [<c012bd53>] __do_softirq+0x93/0x120 [<f8d2a68a>] ? mkiss_receive_buf+0x33a/0x3f0 [mkiss] [<c012be37>] do_softirq+0x57/0x60 [<c012c265>] local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xe0 [<c0320005>] _spin_unlock_bh+0x25/0x30 [<f8d2a68a>] mkiss_receive_buf+0x33a/0x3f0 [mkiss] [<c025ea37>] pty_write+0x47/0x60 [<c025c620>] write_chan+0x1b0/0x220 [<c0259a1c>] ? tty_write_lock+0x1c/0x50 [<c011fec0>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10 [<c0259bea>] tty_write+0x12a/0x1c0 [<c025c470>] ? write_chan+0x0/0x220 [<c018bbc6>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130 [<c0259ac0>] ? tty_write+0x0/0x1c0 [<c018c24d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70 [<c0104d1e>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0xa5 ======================= BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [ax25ipd:3811] Pid: 3811, comm: ax25ipd Not tainted (2.6.25 #3) EIP: 0060:[<c010a9db>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0 EIP is at native_read_tsc+0xb/0x20 EAX: b404aa2c EBX: b404a9c9 ECX: 017f1000 EDX: 0000076b ESI: 00000001 EDI: 00000000 EBP: ecc83afc ESP: ecc83afc DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: b7f5f000 CR3: 2cd8e000 CR4: 000006f0 DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 [<c0204937>] delay_tsc+0x17/0x30 [<c02048e9>] __delay+0x9/0x10 [<c02127f6>] __spin_lock_debug+0x76/0xf0 [<c0212618>] ? spin_bug+0x18/0x100 [<c0147923>] ? __lock_contended+0xa3/0x110 [<c0212998>] _raw_spin_lock+0x68/0x90 [<c03201bf>] _spin_lock_bh+0x4f/0x60 [<f8d31f1a>] ? rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<f8d31f1a>] rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<f8d32404>] rose_route_frame+0x464/0x620 [rose] [<c031ffdd>] ? _read_unlock+0x1d/0x20 [<f8d31fa0>] ? rose_route_frame+0x0/0x620 [rose] [<f8d1c396>] ax25_rx_iframe+0x66/0x3b0 [ax25] [<f8d1f42f>] ? ax25_start_t3timer+0x1f/0x40 [ax25] [<f8d1e65b>] ax25_std_frame_in+0x7fb/0x890 [ax25] [<c0320005>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x25/0x30 [<f8d1bdf6>] ax25_kiss_rcv+0x2c6/0x800 [ax25] [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c014a8a7>] ? __lock_release+0x47/0x70 [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c031ffdd>] ? _read_unlock+0x1d/0x20 [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c02a4d3a>] ? sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x13a/0x1d0 [<c02a4c45>] ? sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x45/0x1d0 [<f8d1bb30>] ? ax25_kiss_rcv+0x0/0x800 [ax25] [<c02ac715>] netif_receive_skb+0x255/0x2f0 [<c02ac5c0>] ? netif_receive_skb+0x100/0x2f0 [<c02af05c>] process_backlog+0x7c/0xf0 [<c02aeb0c>] net_rx_action+0x16c/0x230 [<c02aea36>] ? net_rx_action+0x96/0x230 [<c012bd53>] __do_softirq+0x93/0x120 [<f8d2a68a>] ? mkiss_receive_buf+0x33a/0x3f0 [mkiss] [<c012be37>] do_softirq+0x57/0x60 [<c012c265>] local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xe0 [<c0320005>] _spin_unlock_bh+0x25/0x30 [<f8d2a68a>] mkiss_receive_buf+0x33a/0x3f0 [mkiss] [<c025ea37>] pty_write+0x47/0x60 [<c025c620>] write_chan+0x1b0/0x220 [<c0259a1c>] ? tty_write_lock+0x1c/0x50 [<c011fec0>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10 [<c0259bea>] tty_write+0x12a/0x1c0 [<c025c470>] ? write_chan+0x0/0x220 [<c018bbc6>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130 [<c0259ac0>] ? tty_write+0x0/0x1c0 [<c018c24d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70 [<c0104d1e>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0xa5 ======================= Since rose_route_frame() does not use rose_node_list we can safely remove rose_node_list_lock spin lock here and let it be free for rose_get_neigh(). Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-01-28[ROSE]: Supress sparse warningsEric Dumazet
CHECK net/rose/af_rose.c net/rose/af_rose.c:125:11: warning: expensive signed divide net/rose/af_rose.c:976:46: warning: expensive signed divide net/rose/af_rose.c:1379:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_info_start' - wrong count at exit net/rose/af_rose.c:1406:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_info_stop' - unexpected unlock CHECK net/rose/rose_in.c net/rose/rose_in.c:185:25: warning: expensive signed divide CHECK net/rose/rose_route.c net/rose/rose_route.c:997:46: warning: expensive signed divide net/rose/rose_route.c:1070:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_node_start' - wrong count at exit net/rose/rose_route.c:1093:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_node_stop' - unexpected unlock net/rose/rose_route.c:1146:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_neigh_start' - wrong count at exit net/rose/rose_route.c:1169:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_neigh_stop' - unexpected unlock net/rose/rose_route.c:1229:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_route_start' - wrong count at exit net/rose/rose_route.c:1252:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_route_stop' - unexpected unlock Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[NET]: Make the device list and device lookups per namespace.Eric W. Biederman
This patch makes most of the generic device layer network namespace safe. This patch makes dev_base_head a network namespace variable, and then it picks up a few associated variables. The functions: dev_getbyhwaddr dev_getfirsthwbytype dev_get_by_flags dev_get_by_name __dev_get_by_name dev_get_by_index __dev_get_by_index dev_ioctl dev_ethtool dev_load wireless_process_ioctl were modified to take a network namespace argument, and deal with it. vlan_ioctl_set and brioctl_set were modified so their hooks will receive a network namespace argument. So basically anthing in the core of the network stack that was affected to by the change of dev_base was modified to handle multiple network namespaces. The rest of the network stack was simply modified to explicitly use &init_net the initial network namespace. This can be fixed when those components of the network stack are modified to handle multiple network namespaces. For now the ifindex generator is left global. Fundametally ifindex numbers are per namespace, or else we will have corner case problems with migration when we get that far. At the same time there are assumptions in the network stack that the ifindex of a network device won't change. Making the ifindex number global seems a good compromise until the network stack can cope with ifindex changes when you change namespaces, and the like. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-07[ROSE]: Fix rose.ko oops on unloadAlexey Dobriyan
Commit a3d384029aa304f8f3f5355d35f0ae274454f7cd aka "[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh uses" transformed rose_loopback_neigh var into statically allocated one. However, on unload it will be kfree's which can't work. Steps to reproduce: modprobe rose rmmod rose BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008 printing eip: c014c664 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: rose ax25 fan ufs loop usbhid rtc snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ehci_hcd ac97_bus uhci_hcd thermal usbcore button processor evdev sr_mod cdrom CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<c014c664>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210086 (2.6.23-rc9 #3) EIP is at kfree+0x48/0xa1 eax: 00000556 ebx: c1734aa0 ecx: f6a5e000 edx: f7082000 esi: 00000000 edi: f9a55d20 ebp: 00200287 esp: f6a5ef28 ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 0000 gs: 0033 ss: 0068 Process rmmod (pid: 1823, ti=f6a5e000 task=f7082000 task.ti=f6a5e000) Stack: f9a55d20 f9a5200c 00000000 00000000 00000000 f6a5e000 f9a5200c f9a55a00 00000000 bf818cf0 f9a51f3f f9a55a00 00000000 c0132c60 65736f72 00000000 f69f9630 f69f9528 c014244a f6a4e900 00200246 f7082000 c01025e6 00000000 Call Trace: [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a51f3f>] rose_exit+0x4c/0xd5 [rose] [<c0132c60>] sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x186 [<c014244a>] remove_vma+0x40/0x45 [<c01025e6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99 [<c012bacf>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x118/0x13b [<c01025b6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 ======================= Code: 05 03 1d 80 db 5b c0 8b 03 25 00 40 02 00 3d 00 40 02 00 75 03 8b 5b 0c 8b 73 10 8b 44 24 18 89 44 24 04 9c 5d fa e8 77 df fd ff <8b> 56 08 89 f8 e8 84 f4 fd ff e8 bd 32 06 00 3b 5c 86 60 75 0f EIP: [<c014c664>] kfree+0x48/0xa1 SS:ESP 0068:f6a5ef28 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-07-10[NET]: Make all initialized struct seq_operations const.Philippe De Muyter
Make all initialized struct seq_operations in net/ const Signed-off-by: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-05-03[NET]: Rework dev_base via list_head (v3)Pavel Emelianov
Cleanup of dev_base list use, with the aim to simplify making device list per-namespace. In almost every occasion, use of dev_base variable and dev->next pointer could be easily replaced by for_each_netdev loop. A few most complicated places were converted to using first_netdev()/next_netdev(). Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org> Acked-by: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-25[SK_BUFF]: Introduce skb_reset_transport_header(skb)Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
For the common, open coded 'skb->h.raw = skb->data' operation, so that we can later turn skb->h.raw into a offset, reducing the size of struct sk_buff in 64bit land while possibly keeping it as a pointer on 32bit. This one touches just the most simple cases: skb->h.raw = skb->data; skb->h.raw = {skb_push|[__]skb_pull}() The next ones will handle the slightly more "complex" cases. Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-02-14[PATCH] remove many unneeded #includes of sched.hTim Schmielau
After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in module.h recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous sched.h includes. There are quite a lot of files which include it but don't actually need anything defined in there. Presumably these includes were once needed for macros that used to live in sched.h, but moved to other header files in the course of cleaning it up. To ease the pain, this time I did not fiddle with any header files and only removed #includes from .c-files, which tend to cause less trouble. Compile tested against 2.6.20-rc2 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm2 (with offsets) on alpha, arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig, allmodconfig, and allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64 and all configs in arch/arm/configs on arm. I also checked that no new warnings were introduced by the patch (actually, some warnings are removed that were emitted by unnecessarily included header files). Signed-off-by: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-12[PATCH] mark struct file_operations const 8Arjan van de Ven
Many struct file_operations in the kernel can be "const". Marking them const moves these to the .rodata section, which avoids false sharing with potential dirty data. In addition it'll catch accidental writes at compile time to these shared resources. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-10[NET] ROSE: Fix whitespace errors.YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-12-17[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh usesRalf Baechle
rose_add_loopback_neigh uses kmalloc and the callers were ignoring the error value. Rewrite to let the caller deal with the allocation. This allows the use of static allocation of kmalloc use entirely. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-12-17[AX.25]: Mark all kmalloc users __must_checkRalf Baechle
The recent fix 0506d4068bad834aab1141b5dc5e748eb175c6b3 made obvious that error values were not being propagated through the AX.25 stack. To help with that this patch marks all kmalloc users in the AX.25, NETROM and ROSE stacks as __must_check. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-12-02[ROSE] rose_add_loopback_node: propagate -EAlexey Dobriyan
David Binderman's icc logs: net/rose/rose_route.c(399): remark #593: variable "err" was set but never used Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-05-03[ROSE]: Fix routing table locking in rose_remove_neigh.Ralf Baechle
The locking rule for rose_remove_neigh() are that the caller needs to hold rose_neigh_list_lock, so we better don't take it yet again in rose_neigh_list_lock. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-05-03[ROSE]: Remove useless prototype for rose_remove_neigh().Ralf Baechle
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-08[NET]: kfree cleanupJesper Juhl
From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> This is the net/ part of the big kfree cleanup patch. Remove pointless checks for NULL prior to calling kfree() in net/. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br> Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
2005-10-26[AX.25]: Use constant instead of magic numberRalf Baechle
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
2005-09-06[AX25]: Make ax2asc thread-proofRalf Baechle
Ax2asc was still using a static buffer for all invocations which isn't exactly SMP-safe. Change ax2asc to take an additional result buffer as the argument. Change all callers to provide such a buffer. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-08-29[TCP]: Move the tcp sock states to net/tcp_states.hArnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Lots of places just needs the states, not even linux/tcp.h, where this enum was, needs it. This speeds up development of the refactorings as less sources are rebuilt when things get moved from net/tcp.h. Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-08-23[ROSE]: Fix typo in rose_route_frame() locking fix.David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-08-23[ROSE]: Fix missing unlocks in rose_route_frame()David S. Miller
Noticed by Coverity checker. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!