From 2c616d4d88de1dc5b1545eefdc2e291eeb9f2e9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:02:33 +0000 Subject: SELinux: Use d_is_positive() rather than testing dentry->d_inode Use d_is_positive() rather than testing dentry->d_inode in SELinux to get rid of direct references to d_inode outside of the VFS. Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 29c39e0b03e..79f2c2cb68a 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -1822,12 +1822,12 @@ static inline int may_rename(struct inode *old_dir, ad.u.dentry = new_dentry; av = DIR__ADD_NAME | DIR__SEARCH; - if (new_dentry->d_inode) + if (d_is_positive(new_dentry)) av |= DIR__REMOVE_NAME; rc = avc_has_perm(sid, new_dsec->sid, SECCLASS_DIR, av, &ad); if (rc) return rc; - if (new_dentry->d_inode) { + if (d_is_positive(new_dentry)) { new_isec = new_dentry->d_inode->i_security; new_is_dir = S_ISDIR(new_dentry->d_inode->i_mode); rc = avc_has_perm(sid, new_isec->sid, -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2