From b97f0291a2504291aef850077f98cab68a5a2f33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:56:23 +0530 Subject: tick: Remove code duplication in tick_handle_periodic() tick_handle_periodic() is calling ktime_add() at two places, first before the infinite loop and then at the end of infinite loop. We can rearrange code a bit to fix code duplication here. It looks quite simple and shouldn't break anything, I guess :) Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/be3481e8f3f71df694a4b43623254fc93ca51b59.1395735873.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index 0fec63414fb..015661279b6 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -98,18 +98,19 @@ static void tick_periodic(int cpu) void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev) { int cpu = smp_processor_id(); - ktime_t next; + ktime_t next = dev->next_event; tick_periodic(cpu); if (dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT) return; - /* - * Setup the next period for devices, which do not have - * periodic mode: - */ - next = ktime_add(dev->next_event, tick_period); for (;;) { + /* + * Setup the next period for devices, which do not have + * periodic mode: + */ + next = ktime_add(next, tick_period); + if (!clockevents_program_event(dev, next, false)) return; /* @@ -123,7 +124,6 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev) */ if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres()) tick_periodic(cpu); - next = ktime_add(next, tick_period); } } -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2