From 846afbd1fe015e082c89d56dd42c484d896ef58e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:57:33 -0700 Subject: GIC: Dont disable INT in ack callback Masking in the ack callback fails to work with handle_percpu_irq and handle_edge_irq. The interrupt stays disabled after the first invocation since percpu and edge irq do not unmask an interrupt after handling it. For handle_level_irq masking in the ack is redundant because ack is always called after mask in the mask_ack function. Masking in the ack function is required only when __do_IRQ was used instead of flow handlers, but using __do_IRQ has been deprecated. Remove the masking of interrupt from the ack callback. Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar Signed-off-by: Jeff Ohlstein Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker --- arch/arm/common/gic.c | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/common') diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c index 7dfa9a85bc0..ada6359160e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c @@ -67,25 +67,11 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(unsigned int irq) /* * Routines to acknowledge, disable and enable interrupts - * - * Linux assumes that when we're done with an interrupt we need to - * unmask it, in the same way we need to unmask an interrupt when - * we first enable it. - * - * The GIC has a separate notion of "end of interrupt" to re-enable - * an interrupt after handling, in order to support hardware - * prioritisation. - * - * We can make the GIC behave in the way that Linux expects by making - * our "acknowledge" routine disable the interrupt, then mark it as - * complete. */ static void gic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq) { - u32 mask = 1 << (irq % 32); spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock); - writel(mask, gic_dist_base(irq) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(irq) / 32) * 4); writel(gic_irq(irq), gic_cpu_base(irq) + GIC_CPU_EOI); spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock); } -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2