From 4d6b7a779be34e1df296abc1dc555134a8cf34af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Deacon Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:15:53 +0100 Subject: ARM: 6512/1: perf: fix warnings generated by sparse Russell reported a number of warnings coming from sparse when checking the ARM perf_event.c files: | perf_event.c seems to also have problems too: | | CHECK arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:37:1: warning: symbol 'pmu_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:70:1: warning: symbol 'cpu_hw_events' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1006:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1113:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_stop' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1956:6: warning: symbol 'armv7pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: expected void const volatile [noderef] * | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: got struct frame_tail *tail | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: expected void const [noderef] *from | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: got struct frame_tail *tail This patch resolves these issues so we can live in silence again. Reported-by: Russell King Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Russell King --- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c') diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c index 421a4bb88fe..50c197bfac0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static struct platform_device *pmu_device; * Hardware lock to serialize accesses to PMU registers. Needed for the * read/modify/write sequences. */ -DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pmu_lock); +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pmu_lock); /* * ARMv6 supports a maximum of 3 events, starting from index 1. If we add @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events { */ unsigned long active_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS)]; }; -DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events); struct arm_pmu { enum arm_perf_pmu_ids id; @@ -673,17 +673,17 @@ arch_initcall(init_hw_perf_events); * This code has been adapted from the ARM OProfile support. */ struct frame_tail { - struct frame_tail *fp; - unsigned long sp; - unsigned long lr; + struct frame_tail __user *fp; + unsigned long sp; + unsigned long lr; } __attribute__((packed)); /* * Get the return address for a single stackframe and return a pointer to the * next frame tail. */ -static struct frame_tail * -user_backtrace(struct frame_tail *tail, +static struct frame_tail __user * +user_backtrace(struct frame_tail __user *tail, struct perf_callchain_entry *entry) { struct frame_tail buftail; @@ -709,10 +709,10 @@ user_backtrace(struct frame_tail *tail, void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct frame_tail *tail; + struct frame_tail __user *tail; - tail = (struct frame_tail *)regs->ARM_fp - 1; + tail = (struct frame_tail __user *)regs->ARM_fp - 1; while (tail && !((unsigned long)tail & 0x3)) tail = user_backtrace(tail, entry); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2