From 56f1319e877a969b814b3805c77ea9c31d849f54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell King Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:42:12 +0100 Subject: [ARM] Fix Integrator and Versatile interrupt initialisation Both Integrator and Versatile were using set_irq_handler() and enable_irq(), and working around the initialisation of the chained interrupt, instead of the more correct set_irq_chained_handler() function. Fix Integrator and Versatile to use the right function, and remove these work-arounds. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-versatile') diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c index 799697d32de..cebd48a3dae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c @@ -112,10 +112,9 @@ void __init versatile_init_irq(void) { unsigned int i; - vic_init(VA_VIC_BASE, IRQ_VIC_START, ~(1 << 31)); + vic_init(VA_VIC_BASE, IRQ_VIC_START, ~0); - set_irq_handler(IRQ_VICSOURCE31, sic_handle_irq); - enable_irq(IRQ_VICSOURCE31); + set_irq_chained_handler(IRQ_VICSOURCE31, sic_handle_irq); /* Do second interrupt controller */ writel(~0, VA_SIC_BASE + SIC_IRQ_ENABLE_CLEAR); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2