From cf00a8d18b9a1c2d55b2728e89125c234e821db5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Mackerras Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:07:02 +1100 Subject: powerpc: Fix bug arising from having multiple memory_limit variables We had a static memory_limit in prom.c, and then another one defined in setup_64.c and used in numa.c, which resulted in the kernel crashing when mem=xxx was given on the command line. This puts the declaration in system.h and the definition in mem.c. This also moves the definition of tce_alloc_start/end out of setup_64.c. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras --- arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c') diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c index cb864b8f275..4035cad8d7f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include static int numa_enabled = 1; @@ -300,7 +301,6 @@ static unsigned long __init numa_enforce_memory_limit(unsigned long start, unsig * we've already adjusted it for the limit and it takes care of * having memory holes below the limit. */ - extern unsigned long memory_limit; if (! memory_limit) return size; -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2