From f595ec964daf7f99668039d7303ddedd09a75142 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:47:56 +0200 Subject: common implementation of iterative div/mod We have a few instances of the open-coded iterative div/mod loop, used when we don't expcet the dividend to be much bigger than the divisor. Unfortunately modern gcc's have the tendency to strength "reduce" this into a full mod operation, which isn't necessarily any faster, and even if it were, doesn't exist if gcc implements it in libgcc. The workaround is to put a dummy asm statement in the loop to prevent gcc from performing the transformation. This patch creates a single implementation of this loop, and uses it to replace the open-coded versions I know about. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: john stultz Cc: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Christian Kujau Cc: Robert Hancock Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/xen/time.c | 13 +++---------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/xen') diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c index c39e1a5aa24..52b2e385698 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -150,11 +151,7 @@ static void do_stolen_accounting(void) if (stolen < 0) stolen = 0; - ticks = 0; - while (stolen >= NS_PER_TICK) { - ticks++; - stolen -= NS_PER_TICK; - } + ticks = iter_div_u64_rem(stolen, NS_PER_TICK, &stolen); __get_cpu_var(residual_stolen) = stolen; account_steal_time(NULL, ticks); @@ -166,11 +163,7 @@ static void do_stolen_accounting(void) if (blocked < 0) blocked = 0; - ticks = 0; - while (blocked >= NS_PER_TICK) { - ticks++; - blocked -= NS_PER_TICK; - } + ticks = iter_div_u64_rem(blocked, NS_PER_TICK, &blocked); __get_cpu_var(residual_blocked) = blocked; account_steal_time(idle_task(smp_processor_id()), ticks); } -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2