From 3777a95903953c55f2309a89679b73c19ae5535b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:51:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] i386/x86-64: Don't ack the APIC for bad interrupts when the APIC is not enabled It's bad juju to touch the APIC when it hasn't been enabled. I also moved ack_bad_irq for x86-64 out of line following i386. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) (limited to 'arch/x86_64') diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c index c02218b3ae2..6147770b434 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c @@ -72,6 +72,26 @@ int get_maxlvt(void) return maxlvt; } +/* + * 'what should we do if we get a hw irq event on an illegal vector'. + * each architecture has to answer this themselves. + */ +void ack_bad_irq(unsigned int irq) +{ + printk("unexpected IRQ trap at vector %02x\n", irq); + /* + * Currently unexpected vectors happen only on SMP and APIC. + * We _must_ ack these because every local APIC has only N + * irq slots per priority level, and a 'hanging, unacked' IRQ + * holds up an irq slot - in excessive cases (when multiple + * unexpected vectors occur) that might lock up the APIC + * completely. + * But don't ack when the APIC is disabled. -AK + */ + if (!disable_apic) + ack_APIC_irq(); +} + void clear_local_APIC(void) { int maxlvt; -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2