From 4ad9b208cf1d03c8c3c1e0063ee6eea88833118f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: FUJITA Tomonori Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:47 -0700 Subject: sparc: remove dma64_addr_t usage dma64_addr_t looks pointless (at least there is no point that an architecture has the own dma64_addr_t typedef). dma_addr_t is set to 32 or 64 bits appropriately. You can use u64 at places where you know that 64 bit address is always necessary. Let's use u64 instead for sparc32. Looks like PCI654_REQUIRED_MASK or PCI64_ADR_BASE isn't used. They can be removed? Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori Acked-by: David Miller Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/sparc/include/asm/pci_64.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pci_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pci_64.h index 5312782f0b5..948b686ec08 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pci_64.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pci_64.h @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static inline void pcibios_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active) * types on sparc64. However, it requires that the device * can drive enough of the 64 bits. */ -#define PCI64_REQUIRED_MASK (~(dma64_addr_t)0) +#define PCI64_REQUIRED_MASK (~(u64)0) #define PCI64_ADDR_BASE 0xfffc000000000000UL #ifdef CONFIG_PCI -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2