From 92394b5c2be774425f255b5c7afbd8b19978fe12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Norris Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:53:42 -0700 Subject: mtd: spelling fixes Signed-off-by: Brian Norris Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy --- drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c') diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c b/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c index e3cd1ffad2f..ac4092591ae 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ /* find_boot_record: Find the NFTL Media Header and its Spare copy which contains the * various device information of the NFTL partition and Bad Unit Table. Update - * the ReplUnitTable[] table accroding to the Bad Unit Table. ReplUnitTable[] + * the ReplUnitTable[] table according to the Bad Unit Table. ReplUnitTable[] * is used for management of Erase Unit in other routines in nftl.c and nftlmount.c */ static int find_boot_record(struct NFTLrecord *nftl) @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int check_free_sectors(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int address, int * * Return: 0 when succeed, -1 on error. * - * ToDo: 1. Is it neceressary to check_free_sector after erasing ?? + * ToDo: 1. Is it necessary to check_free_sector after erasing ?? */ int NFTL_formatblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) { @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ int NFTL_formatblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) nb_erases = le32_to_cpu(uci.WearInfo); nb_erases++; - /* wrap (almost impossible with current flashs) or free block */ + /* wrap (almost impossible with current flash) or free block */ if (nb_erases == 0) nb_erases = 1; @@ -363,10 +363,10 @@ fail: * Mark as 'IGNORE' each incorrect sector. This check is only done if the chain * was being folded when NFTL was interrupted. * - * The check_free_sectors in this function is neceressary. There is a possible + * The check_free_sectors in this function is necessary. There is a possible * situation that after writing the Data area, the Block Control Information is * not updated according (due to power failure or something) which leaves the block - * in an umconsistent state. So we have to check if a block is really FREE in this + * in an inconsistent state. So we have to check if a block is really FREE in this * case. */ static void check_sectors_in_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) { @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int calc_chain_length(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) for (;;) { length++; - /* avoid infinite loops, although this is guaranted not to + /* avoid infinite loops, although this is guaranteed not to happen because of the previous checks */ if (length >= nftl->nb_blocks) { printk("nftl: length too long %d !\n", length); @@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ static int calc_chain_length(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) /* format_chain: Format an invalid Virtual Unit chain. It frees all the Erase Units in a * Virtual Unit Chain, i.e. all the units are disconnected. * - * It is not stricly correct to begin from the first block of the chain because + * It is not strictly correct to begin from the first block of the chain because * if we stop the code, we may see again a valid chain if there was a first_block * flag in a block inside it. But is it really a problem ? * - * FixMe: Figure out what the last statesment means. What if power failure when we are + * FixMe: Figure out what the last statement means. What if power failure when we are * in the for (;;) loop formatting blocks ?? */ static void format_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static void format_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) * totally free (only 0xff). * * Definition: Free Erase Unit -- A properly erased/formatted Free Erase Unit should have meet the - * following critia: + * following criteria: * 1. */ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) { @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) erase_mark = le16_to_cpu ((h1.EraseMark | h1.EraseMark1)); if (erase_mark != ERASE_MARK) { /* if no erase mark, the block must be totally free. This is - possible in two cases : empty filsystem or interrupted erase (very unlikely) */ + possible in two cases : empty filesystem or interrupted erase (very unlikely) */ if (check_free_sectors (nftl, block * nftl->EraseSize, nftl->EraseSize, 1) != 0) return -1; @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) /* get_fold_mark: Read fold mark from Unit Control Information #2, we use FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS * to indicate that we are in the progression of a Virtual Unit Chain folding. If the UCI #2 * is FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS when mounting the NFTL, the (previous) folding process is interrupted - * for some reason. A clean up/check of the VUC is neceressary in this case. + * for some reason. A clean up/check of the VUC is necessary in this case. * * WARNING: return 0 if read error */ @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ int NFTL_mount(struct NFTLrecord *s) printk("Block %d: incorrect logical block: %d expected: %d\n", block, logical_block, first_logical_block); /* the chain is incorrect : we must format it, - but we need to read it completly */ + but we need to read it completely */ do_format_chain = 1; } if (is_first_block) { @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ int NFTL_mount(struct NFTLrecord *s) printk("Block %d: incorrectly marked as first block in chain\n", block); /* the chain is incorrect : we must format it, - but we need to read it completly */ + but we need to read it completely */ do_format_chain = 1; } else { printk("Block %d: folding in progress - ignoring first block flag\n", -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2